Evaluating individual intervention components: making decisions based on the results of a factorial screening experiment

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 238-251

  Collins, Linda M ^a   Trail, Jessica B ^a   Kugler, Kari C ^a   Baker, Timothy B ^b   Piper, Megan E ^b   Mermelstein, Robin J ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral interventions; Comparative effectiveness; Factorial experiments; Multiphase optimization strategy

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE GUM; NICOTINE PATCH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FACTORIAL DESIGN; HUMAN; PATIENT COUNSELING; SCREENING; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 84907699885     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-013-0239-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Collins LM, Baker TB, Mermelstein RJ, et al. The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2011; 41(2): 208-226.
2. Clapham C, Nicholson J. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
3. Collins LM, Chakraborty B, Murphy SA, Strecher V. Comparison of a phased experimental approach and a single randomized clinical trial for developing multicomponent behavioral interventions. Clin Trials. 2009; 6(1): 5-15.
4. Baker TB, Mermelstein R, Collins LM, et al. New methods for tobacco dependence treatment research. Ann Behav Med. 2011; 41(2): 192-207.
5. Strecher VJ, McClure JB, Alexander GL, et al. Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34(5): 373-381.
6. Caldwell LL, Smith EA, Collins LM, et al. Translational research in South Africa: evaluating implementation quality using a factorial design. Child Youth Care For. 2012; 41(2): 119-136.
7. Smith EA, Palen L, Caldwell LL, et al. Substance use and sexual risk prevention in Cape Town, South Africa: an evaluation of the HealthWise program. Prev Sci. 2008; 9: 311-321.
8. Collins LM, Dziak JJ, Li R. Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: a resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. Psychol Methods. 2009; 14(3): 202-224.
9. Wu CFJ, Hamada M. Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization. New York: Wiley; 2011.
10. Chakraborty B, Collins LM, Strecher VJ, Murphy SA. Developing multicomponent interventions using fractional factorial designs. Stat Med. 2009; 28(21): 2687-2708.
11. Kirk RE. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013.
12. Kugler KC, Trail JB, Dziak JJ, Collins LM. Effect Coding Versus Dummy Coding in Analysis of Data from Factorial Experiments. [Technical Report No. 12–120]. University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State: The Methodology Center, Penn State; 2012.
13. Fisher JO. The Design of Experiments. New York: Hafner; 1971.
14. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Bierman KL. A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prev Sci. 2004; 5(3): 185-196.
15. Kirk RE. Effect magnitude: a different focus. J Stat Plan Infer. 2007; 137: 1634-1646.