A comparative study between local bone graft with a cage and with no cage in single posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): A multicenter study

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 134, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1051-1057

  Liu, Zhili ^a   Liu, Jiaming ^a   Tan, Yongming ^a   He, Laichang ^a   Long, Xinhua ^a   Yang, Dong ^a   Huang, Shanhu ^a   Shu, Yong ^a  

^a NANCHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cage; Local bone graft; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Spinal fuse

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HEIGHT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEEK CAGE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE INSTABILITY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; AGED; EQUIPMENT; ILIAC BONE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; SPINE FUSION; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILIUM; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 84907662869     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: 14343916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-2016-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cloward RB (1953) The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg 10:154-168
2. Collis JS (1985) Total disc replacement: a modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion: report of 750 cases. Clin Orthop 193:64-67
3. Lin PM (1985) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique: complications and pitfalls. Clin Orthop 193:90-102
4. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE (2004) Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-arttechnical advances: invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:24-30
5. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT et al (2005) Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2:679-685
6. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT et al (2005) Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: part 10: fusion following decompression in patients with stenosis without spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2:686-691
7. Muramatsu K, Hachiya Y, Izawa H et al (2012) Remodeling of heat-treated cortical bone allografts for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: serial 10-year follow-up. Cell Tissue Bank 13:529-536
8. Linovitz RJ, Peppers TA (2002) Use of an advanced formulation of beta-tricalcium phosphate as a bone extender in interbody lumbar fusion. Orthopedics 25(5 Suppl):s585-s589
9. Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Kanayama M et al (2002) Clinical results of single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F carbon cage filled with a mixture of local morselized bone and bioactive ceramic granules. Spine 27:258-262
10. Kim H, Lee CK, Yeom JS et al (2012) The efficacy of porous hydroxyapatite bone chip as an extender of local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21(7):1324-1330
11. Diedrich O, Kraft CN, Perlick L et al (2001) The posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages (PLIF) and transpedicular stabilization. Zentralbl Neurochir 62:106-113
12. Patil SS, Rawall S, Nagad P et al (2011) Outcome of single level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion using corticocancellous laminectomy bone chips. Indian J Orthop 45(6):500-503
13. Ito Z, Matsuyama Y, Sakai Y et al (2010) Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 35(21):E1101-E1105
14. Ito Z, Imagama S, Kanemura T et al (2013) Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a multicenter study. Eur Spine J 22:1158-1163
15. Hu MW, Liu ZL, Zhou Y et al (2012) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using spinous process and laminae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:373-377
16. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Paine KW, Cauchoix J et al (1974) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 99:30-50
17. Santos ER, Goss DG, Morcom RK et al (2003) Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages. Spine 28:997-1001
18. Cloward RB (1963) Lesions of the intervertebral disks and their treatment by interbody fusion methods: the painful disk. Clin Orthop 27:51-77
19. Cloward RB (1981) Spondylolisthesis: treatment by laminectomy and posterior interbody fusion. Clin Orthop 154:74-82
20. Cloward RB (1985) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion updated. Clin Orthop 193:16-19
21. Okuyama K, Kido T, Unoki E et al (2007) PLIF with a titanium cage and excised facet joint bone for degenerative spondylolisthesis-- in augmentation with a pedicle screw. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:53-59
22. Chen L, Tang T, Yang H (2003) Complications associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using Bagby and Kuslich method for treatment of spondylolisthesis. Chin Med J (Engl) 116:99-103
23. Miura Y, Imagama S, Yoda M et al (2003) Is local bone viable as a source of bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion? Spine 28:2386-2389
24. Abdul QR, Qayum MS, Saradhi MV et al (2011) Clinico-radiological profile of indirect neural decompression using cage or autograft as interbody construct in posterior lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis: which is better? J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2:12-16