Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 21, 2010, Pages

  Ito, Zenya ^a   Matsuyama, Yukihiro ^a   Sakai, Yoshihito ^a   Imagama, Shiro ^a   Wakao, Norimitsu ^a   Ando, Kei ^a   Hirano, Kenichi ^a   Tauchi, Ryoji ^a   Muramoto, Akio ^a   Matsui, Hiroki ^a   Matsumoto, Tomohiro ^a   Kanemura, Tokumi ^b   Yoshida, Go ^b   Ishikawa, Yoshimoto ^b   Ishiguro, Naoki ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agriculture Co operative Associations Konan Kosei Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

autologous iliac bone graft; fusion rate; posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; LUMBAR DISK HERNIA; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957988230     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181de4f2e     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. An HS, Lynch K, Toth J. Prospective comparison of autograft vs. allograft for adult posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: differences among freeze-dried, frozen, and mixed grafts. J Spinal Disord 1995;8:131-135
2. Le Huec JC, Lesprit E, Delavigne C, et al. Tri-calcium phosphate ceramics and allografts as bone substitutes for spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis: comparative clinical results at four years. Acta Orthop Belg 1997;63: 202-211
3. Frenkel SR, Moskovich R, Spivak J, et al. Demineralized bone matrix. Enhancement of spinal fusion. Spine 1993;18:1634-1639
4. Holliger EH, Trawick RH, Boden SD, et al. Morphology of the lumbar intertransverse process fusion mass in the rabbit model: a comparison between two bone graft materials-rhBMP-2 and autograft. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:125-128
5. Tay BK, Le AX, Heilman M, et al. Use of a collagen-hydroxyapatite matrix in spinal fusion. A rabbit model. Spine 1998;23:2276-2281
6. Younger EM, Chapman MW. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 1989;3:192-195
7. Keller EE, Triplett WW. Iliac bone grafting: review of 160 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:11-14.
8. Summers BN, Eisenstein SM. Donor site pain from the ilium: a complication of lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71:677-680
9. Violas P, Chapuis M, Bracq H. Local autograft bone in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:189-192
10. Miura Y, Imagama S, Yoda M, et al. Is local bone viable as a source of bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion? Spine 2003;28:2386-2389
11. Hashimoto T, Oha F, Shigenobu K, et al. Mid-term clinical results of Graf stabilization for lumbar degenerative pathologies: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine J 2001;1:283-289
12. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine 2000; 25:1437-1446
13. Agazzi S, Reverdin A, May D. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases. J Neurosurg 1999;91:186-192
14. Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel- Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 2002;27:2674-2683
15. Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Kanayama M, et al. Clinical results of singlelevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F carbon cage filled with a mixture of local morselized bone and bioactive ceramic granules. Spine 2002;27:258-262
16. Kim KS, Yang TK, Lee JC. Radiological changes in the bone fusion site after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using carbon cages impacted with laminar bone chips: follow-up study over more than 4 years. Spine 2005;30:655-660
17. Diedrich O, Perlick L, Schmitt O, et al. Radiographic characteristics on conventional radiographs after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparative study between radiotranslucent and radiopaque cages. J Spinal Disord 2001;14:522-532
18. Robertson PA, Wray AC. Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery: a prospective analysis of morbidity. Spine 2001; 26:1473-1476
19. Sengupta DK, Truumees E, Patel CK, et al. Outcome of local bone versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in the instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. Spine 2006;31:985-991