Formal education of patients about to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2014, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan ^a   Vaughan, Jessica ^a   Davidson, Brian R ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHORT FORM 36; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; EDUCATION; INFORMED CONSENT; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MULTIMEDIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TEACHING;

CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MULTIMEDIA; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84907611849     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009933.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Blay N, Donoghue J. The effect of pre-admission education on domiciliary recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005;22(4):14-9.
2. Bollschweiler E, Apitsch J, Obliers R, Koerfer A, Monig SP, Metzger R, et al.Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery 2008;248(2):205-11.
3. Clark S, Mangram A, Ernest D, Lebron R, Peralta L. The informed consent: a study of the efficacy of informed consents and the associated role of language barriers. Journal of Surgical Education 2011;68(2):143-7.
4. Fink AS, Prochazka AV, Henderson WG, Bartenfeld D, Nyirenda C, Webb A, et al.Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Annals of Surgery 2010;252(1):27-36.
5. Fink AS, Prochazka AV, Henderson WG, Bartenfeld D, Nyirenda C, Webb A, et al.Predictors of comprehension during surgical informed consent. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2010;210(6):919-26.
6. Wilhelm D, Gillen S, Wirnhier H, Kranzfelder M, Schneider A, Schmidt A, et al.Extended preoperative patient education using a multimedia DVD-impact on patients receiving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2009;394(2):227-33.
7. Broadbent E, Kahokehr A, Booth RJ, Thomas J, Windsor JA, Buchanan CM, et al.A brief relaxation intervention reduces stress and improves surgical wound healing response: a randomised trial. Brain, Behavior and Immunity 2012;26(2):212-7.
8. Stergiopoulou A, Birbas K, Katostara I, Mantas J. The effect of interactive multimedia on preoperative knowledge and postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods of Information in Medicine 2007;46(4):406-9.
9. Stergiopoulou A, Birbas K, Katostaras T, Diomidous M, Mantas J. The effect of a multimedia health educational program on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2006;124:920-5.
10. Attili AF, De Santis A, Capri R, Repice AM, Maselli S. The natural history of gallstones: the GREPCO experience. The GREPCO Group. Hepatology 1995;21(3):655-60.
11. Ballal M, David G, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Deakin M, Slavin JP. Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surgical Endoscopy 2009;23(10):2338-44.
12. Bates T, Harrison M, Lowe D, Lawson C, Padley N. Longitudinal study of gall stone prevalence at necropsy. Gut 1992;33(1):103-7.
13. Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:763-9.
14. Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive -trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287-98.
15. Cassady JF Jr, Wysocki TT, Miller KM, Cancel DD, Izenberg N. Use of a preanesthetic video for facilitation of parental education and anxiolysis before pediatric ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1999;88(2):246-50.
16. Copenhagen Trial Unit. TSA -Trial Sequential Analysis, 2011. ctu.dk/tsa/ (accessed 6 January 2014).
17. DeMets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Statistics in Medicine 1987;6(3):341-50.
18. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177-88.
19. Dolan JP, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG. The national mortality burden and significant factors associated with open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 1997-2006. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2009;13(12):2292-301.
20. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997;315(7109):629-34.
21. Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg SL, Alexakis N, Als-Nielsen B, Colli A, et al.Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). 2013, Issue 8. Art. No.: LIVER.
22. GREPCO. Prevalence of gallstone disease in an Italian adult female population. Rome group for the epidemiology and prevention of cholelithiasis (GREPCO). American Journal of Epidemiology 1984;119(5):796-805.
23. GREPCO. The epidemiology of gallstone disease in Rome, Italy. Part i. Prevalence data in men. The Rome group for epidemiology and prevention of cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Hepatology 1988;8(4):904-6.
24. Gurusamy KS, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR. Day-case versus overnight stay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006798.pub3]
25. Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery 2008;95(2):161-8.
26. Gurusamy KS, Gluud C, Nikolova D, Davidson BR. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. British Journal of Surgery 2009;96(4):342-9.
27. Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K. Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. British Journal of Surgery 2004;91(6):734-8.
28. HESonline. Hospital Episode Statistics. Main procedures and interventions: 3 character, 2011. www.hscic.gov.uk/hes (accessed 6 January 2014).
29. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539-58.
30. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
31. International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice CFR & ICH Guidelines. Vol. 1, PA 19063-2043, USA: Barnett International/PAREXEL, 1997.
32. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982-9.
33. Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2]
34. Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20(4):641-54.
35. McDonald S, Hetrick S, Green S. Pre-operative education for hip or knee replacement. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003526.pub2]
36. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al.Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609-13.
37. Newell DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. International Journal of Epidemiology 1992;21(5):837-41.
38. National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1992. consensus.nih.gov/1992/1992GallstonesLaparoscopy090html.htm (accessed 6 January 2014).
39. O'Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KB, et al.Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2]
40. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
41. Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591-603.
42. Savovic J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Juni P, Pildal J, et al.Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429-38.
43. Savovic J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al.Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment 2012;16(35):1-82.
44. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408-12.
45. Sinha S, Hofman D, Stoker DL, Friend PJ, Poloniecki JD, Thompson MM, et al.Epidemiological study of provision of cholecystectomy in England from 2000 to 2009: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics. Surgical Endoscopy 2013;27(1):162-75.
46. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al.SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158:200-7.
47. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, et al.SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2013;346:e7586.
48. Strasberg SM, Clavien PA. Overview of therapeutic modalities for the treatment of gallstone diseases. American Journal of Surgery 1993;165(4):420-6.
49. Thorlund K, Devereaux PJ, Wetterslev J, Guyatt G, Ioannidis JP, Thabane L, et al.Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):276-86.
50. Thorlund K, Anema A, Mills E. Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals. Clinical Epidemiology 2010;2:57-66.
51. Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual for Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), 2011. ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf (accessed 6 January 2014).
52. Todd KH, Funk JP. The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores. Academic Emergency Medicine 1996;3(2):142-6. [PUBMED: 8808375]
53. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(1):64-75.
54. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in a random-effects meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009;9:86.
55. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman GD, et al.Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336:601-5.