Paving the Way to Successful Implementation: Identifying Key Barriers to Use of Technology-Based Therapeutic Tools for Behavioral Health Care

Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 54-70

  Ramsey, Alex ^a   Lord, Sarah ^b   Torrey, John ^b   Marsch, Lisa ^b   Lardiere, Michael ^c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c National Council for Behavioral Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; TECHNOLOGY;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84907610580     PISSN: 10943412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-014-9436-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Chiauzzi E, Green TC, Lord S, et al. My Student Body: A high-risk drinking prevention web site for college students. Journal of American College Health 2005;53:263–274.
2. Lord S, D’Amante D, Meyers S, et al. Connecting to prevention: Efficacy of an online alcohol and other drug prevention program for early adolescents. Paper presentation, Society for Adolescent Health, 2007.
3. Marsch L, Bickel W, Badger G. Applying computer technology to substance abuse prevention science: Results of a preliminary examination. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse 2006; 16(2): 69–94.
4. Ben-Zeev D. Mobile technologies in the study, assessment, and treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2012; 38(3): 384–385. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr179
5. Lord SE, Trudeau KJ, Black RA, et al. CHAT: development and validation of a computer-delivered, self-report, substance use assessment for adolescents. Substance Use & Misuse 2011;46(6):781–794.
6. Brunette MF, Ferron JC, McHugo GJ, et al. An electronic decision support system to motivate people with severe mental illnesses to quit smoking. Psychiatric Services 2011;62(4):360–366.
7. Carroll KM, Ball SA, Martino S, et al. Enduring effects of a computer-assisted training program for cognitive behavioral therapy: a 6-month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2009;100(1–2):178–181.
8. Dallery J, Raiff BR. Contingency management in the 21st century: Technological innovations to promote smoking cessation. Substance Use & Misuse 2011;46(1):10–22.
9. Marsch LA, Grabinski MJ, Bickel WK, et al. Computer-assisted HIV prevention for youth with substance use disorders. Substance Use & Misuse 2011; 46(1): 46–56.
10. Proudfoot J, Goldberg D, Mann A, et al. Computerized, interactive, multimedia cognitive-behavioural program for anxiety and depression in general practice. Psychological Medicine 2003; 33(2): 217–227.
11. van der Krieke L, Wunderink L, Emerencia AC, et al. E-mental health self-management for psychotic disorders: State of the art and future perspectives. Psychiatric Services 2014; 65(1): 33–49.
12. Gustafson DH, Boyle MG, Shaw BR, et al. An e-Health solution for people with alcohol problems. Alcohol Research & Health 2011; 33(4): 327–337.
13. Newman MG, Szkodny LE, Llera SJ, et al. A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clinical Psychology Review 2011;31(1):89–103.
14. Preziosa A, Grassi A, Gaggioli A, et al. Therapeutic Applications of the mobile phone. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 2009; 37(3): 313–324.
15. Marsch LA. Leveraging technology to enhance addiction treatment and recovery. Journal of Addictive Diseases 2012; 31(3): 313–318.
16. Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, et al. A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services 2008; 26(2–4): 109–160.
17. Noar SM, Black HG, Pierce LB. Efficacy of computer technology-based HIV prevention interventions: a meta-analysis AIDS. 2009; 23(1): 107–115.
18. Pating DR, Miller MM, Goplerud E, et al. New systems of care for substance use disorders: treatment, finance, and technology under health care reform. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2012; 35(2): 327–356.
19. Harris Interactive. Patient Choice an Increasingly Important Factor in the Age of the “Healthcare Consumer”. Available at http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/HarrisPolls/tabid/447/mid/1508/articleId/1074/ctl/ReadCustom%20Default/Default.aspx. Accessed March 10, 2013.
20. Ben-Zeev D, Davis KE, Kaiser S, et al. Mobile technologies among people with serious mental illness: opportunities for future services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2013; 40(4): 340–3.
21. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Pew Internet: Health. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2011/November/Pew-Internet-Health.aspx. Accessed June 19, 2013.
22. Ennis L, Rose D, Callard F, et al. Rapid progress or lengthy process? Electronic personal health records in mental health. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11: 117.
23. Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, et al. Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Affairs 2009; 28(2): 282–293.
24. Takian A, Sheikh A, Barber N. We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England. BMC Health Services Research 2012; 12: 484.
25. Buti AL, Eakins D, Fussell H, et al. Clinician attitudes, social norms and intentions to use a computer-assisted intervention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2013; 44(4): 433–437.
26. Mohr DC, Burns MN, Schueller SM, et al. Behavioral intervention technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. General Hospital Psychiatry 2013.
27. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 2009; 4(1): 50.
28. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
29. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly 2004; 82(4): 581–629.
30. Molfenter T, Capoccia VA, Boyle MG, et al. The readiness of addiction treatment agencies for health care reform. Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy 2012; 7:16.
31. California State Rural Health Association. Rural Providers and eHealth: The Future is Now. Sacramento, CA, 2010.
32. Lehman WE, Greener JM, Simpson DD. Assessing organizational readiness for change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2002; 22(4): 197–209.
33. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2010; 43(1): 159–172.
34. Andrews M. ‘Who is being heard? Response bias in open-ended responses in a large government employee survey.’ Public Opinion Quarterly 2004; 69: 3760–3766.
35. Olson DE. Agency theory in the not-for-profit sector: Its role at independent colleges. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2000; 29(2): 280–296.
36. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 2005; 15: 1277–1288.
37. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2006.
38. McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Organizational and physician perspectives about facilitating handheld computer use in clinical practice: results of a cross-site qualitative study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005; 12(5): 568–575.
39. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
40. Blaya JA, Fraser HS, Holt B. E-health technologies show promise in developing countries. Health Affairs 2010; 29(2): 244–251.
41. Burns LR, Pauly MV. Accountable care organizations may have difficulty avoiding the failures of integrated delivery networks of the 1990s. Health Affairs 2012; 31(11): 2407–2416.
42. Aarons GA, Glisson C, Green PD, et al. The organizational social context of mental health services and clinician attitudes toward evidence-based practice: A United States national study. Implementation Science 2012; 7: 56.
43. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 2011; 38(2): 65–76.