Efficiency of ferromagnetic nanoparticles suspended in ethylene glycol for applications in energy devices: Effects of particle size, temperature, and concentration

International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer

Volumn 58, Issue , 2014, Pages 138-146

  Hemmat Esfe, Mohammad ^a   Saedodin, Seyfolah ^a   Mahian, Omid ^c   Wongwises, Somchai ^b  

^a SEMNAN UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Flow regime; Particle size; Thermal conductivity; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

PARTICLE SIZE; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; VISCOSITY;

ENERGY DEVICES; FERROMAGNETIC NANOPARTICLES; FLOW REGIMES;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84907602876     PISSN: 07351933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.08.035     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Mahian O., Kianifar A., Kalogirou S.A., Pop I., Wongwises S. A review of the applications of nanofluids in solar energy. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2013, 57:582-594.
2. Taylor R., Coulombe S., Otanicar T., Phelan P., Gunawan A., Lv W., Rosengarten G., Prasher R., Tyagi H. Small particles, big impacts: a review of the diverse applications of nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113:011301.
3. Saidur R., Leong K.Y., Mohammad H.A. A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15:1646-1668.
4. Witharana S., Palabiyik I., Musina Z., Ding Y. Stability of glycol nanofluids - the theory and experiment. Powder Technol. 2013, 239:72-77.
5. Ghadimi A., Saidur R., Metselaar H.S.C. A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2011, 54:4051-4068.
6. Witharana S., Chen H., Ding Y. Stability of nanofluids in quiescent and shear flow fields. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6:231-236.
7. Chen H., Witharana S., Jin Y., Kim C., Ding Y. Predicting thermal conductivity of liquid suspensions of nanoparticles (nanofluids) based on rheology. Particuology 2009, 7:151-157.
8. Colangelo G., Favale E., de Risi A., Laforgia D. Results of experimental investigations on the heat conductivity of nanofluids based on diathermic oil for high temperature applications. Appl. Energy 2012, 97:828-883.
9. 3 nanofluids prepared through ultrasonic vibration. Appl. Energy 2011, 88:4527-4533.
10. 2-water nanofluids. Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 2009, 33:706-714.
11. Yiamsawasd T., Dalkilic A.S., Wongwises S. Measurement of the thermal conductivity of titania and alumina nanofluids. Thermochim. Acta 2012, 545:48-56.
12. 3 nanofluids thermal properties and rheology - effects of transient and steady-state heat exposure. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2014, 76:155-167.
13. Paul G., Chopkar M., Manna I., Das P.K. Techniques for measuring the thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2010, 14:1913-1924.
14. Aladag B., Halelfadl S., Doner N., Maré T., Duret S., Estellé P. Experimental investigations of the viscosity of nanofluids at low temperatures. Appl. Energy 2012, 97:876-880.
15. 3 nanoparticles suspended in a mixture of ethylene glycol and water for high temperature applications. Appl. Energy 2013, 111:40-45.
16. Halelfadl S., Estellé P., Aladag B., Doner N., Maré T. Viscosity of carbon nanotubes water-based nanofluids: influence of concentration and temperature. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2013, 71:111-117.
17. Maré T., Halelfadl S., Sow O., Estellé P., Duret S., Bazantay F. Comparison of the thermal performances of two nanofluids at low temperature in a plate heat exchanger. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 2011, 35:1535-1543.
18. Estellé P., Halelfadl S., Doner N., Maré T. Shear history effect on the viscosity of carbon nanotubes water-based nanofluid. Curr. Nanosci. 2013, 9:225-230.
19. Mahbubul I.M., Saidur R., Amalina M.A. Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2012, 55:874-885.
20. Mahian O., Kianifar A., Wongwises S. Dispersing of ZnO nanoparticles in a mixture of ethylene glycol-water, exploration of temperature-dependent density, and sensitivity analysis. Cluster Sci. 2013, 24:1103-1114.
21. Yiamsawasd T., Dalkilic S.A., Wongwises S. Measurement of specific heat of nanofluids. Curr. Nanosci. 2012, 8:939-944.
22. Nkurikiyimfura I., Wanga Y., Pan Z. Heat transfer enhancement by magnetic nanofluids-a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2013, 21:548-561.
23. Hong T.K., Yang H.S., Choi C.J. Study of the enhanced thermal conductivity of Fe nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97:64311-64314.
24. Li Q., Xuan Y., Wang J. Experimental investigations on transport properties of magnetic fluids. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 2005, 30:109-116.
25. Hong T.K., Yang H.S. Nanoparticle-dispersion-dependent thermal conductivity in nanofluids. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2005, 47:321-324.
26. Hong K.S., Hong T.K., Yang H.S. Thermal conductivity of Fe nanofluids depending on the cluster size of nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88:031901.
27. Yoo D.H., Hong K.S., Yang H.S. Study of thermal conductivity of nanofluids for the application of heat transfer fluids. Thermochim. Acta 2007, 455:66-69.
28. Sinha K., Kavlicoglu B., Liu Y., Gordaninejad F., Graeve O.A. A comparative study of thermal behavior of iron and copper nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106:064307.
29. Halelfadl S., Maré T., Estellé P. Efficiency of carbon nanotubes water based nanofluids as coolants. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 2014, 3:104-110.
30. Hamilton R.L., Crosser O.K. Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two component systems. IEC Fundam. 1962, 1:82-191.
31. Yu W., Choi S.U.S. The role of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a renovated Hamilton-Crosser model. J. Nanopart. Res. 2004, 6:355-361.
32. Einstein A. Eine neue bestimmung der molekuldimensionen. Ann. Phys. Leipzig 1906, 19:289-306.
33. Wang X., Xu X., Choi S.U.S. Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle fluid mixture. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 1999, 13:474-480.
34. Timofeeva E.V., Routbort J.L., Singh D. Particle shape effect on thermophysical properties of alumina nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106:014304.