Regional cooperation for European seas: Governance models in support of the implementation of the MSFD

Marine Policy

Volumn 50, Issue , 2014, Pages 364-372

  van Tatenhove, Jan ^a   Raakjaer, Jesper ^b   van Leeuwen, Judith ^a   van Hoof, Luc ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Governance models; Governance performance; Marine regions; MSFD; Regional cooperation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; MARINE POLICY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER;

EUROPE;

EID: 84907595585     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.020     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy. Marine Strategy Directive [SEC 2005 1290]. Brussels, COM; 2005. 505 final.
2. Commission of the European Communities. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy. Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
3. Commission of the European Communities. Green paper reform of the common fisheries policy. COM; 2009. 163 final.
4. Commission of the European Communities. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning and integrated coastal management. Brussels.COM; 2013. 133 final.
5. Gezelius S.S., Hegland T.J., Palevsky H., Raakjaer J. The politics of implementation in resource conservation: comparing the EU, Denmark and Norway. Making fisheries management work. Implementation of policies for sustainable fishing 2008, 208-229. Springer, Dordrecht.
6. Long R. The Marine Strategy Framework Directive: a new European approach to the regulation of the marine environment, marine natural resources and marine ecological services. J Energy Nat Resour Law 2011, 29:1-44.
7. Ounanian K., Delaney A., Raakjaer J., Ramirez-Monsalve P. On unequal footing: stakeholders[U+05F3] perspectives on the Marine Strategy Framework Directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management. Mar Policy 2012, 36(3):658-666.
8. Van Leeuwen J., Van Hoof L., Van Tatenhove J. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Policy 2012, 36(3):636-643.
9. Van Hoof L., Hendriksen A., Bloomfield H. Drivers and scenarios for regional cooperation in implementing the MSFD, Marine Policy set of ODEMM. Mar Policy 2014, 50:339-346.
10. Hendriksen A., Jouanneau C., Raakjaer J. Fishing for options: stakeholder views on MSFD implementation in European Seas, Marine Policy set of ODEMM. Mar Policy 2014, 50:353-363.
11. Salomon M., Dross M. Challenges in cross-sectoral marine protection in Europe. Mar Policy 2013, 42:142-149.
12. OSPAR Commission. Regional implementation Framework for the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive; 2012.
13. HELCOM. A coordination platform for the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive in the Baltic Sea region; 2011.
14. Van Leeuwen J., Raakjaer J., Van Hoof L., Van Tatenhove J., Long R., Ounanian K. Implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: a policy perspective on regulatory, institutional and stakeholder impediments to effective implementation, Marine Policy set of ODEMM. Mar Policy 2014, 50:325-330.
15. Van Tatenhove J. How to turn the tide: developing legitimate marine governance arrangements at the level of regional seas. Ocean Coast Manage 2013, 71:296-304.
16. Andrews C.J. Rationality in policy decision making. Handbook of public policy analysis. Theory, politics, and methods 2007, 163. CRC Press, London/New York.
17. Berry J.M., Portney K.E., Thomson K. The rebirth of urban democracy. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands 1993, DC: Brookings Institution, Washington, ([J Public Adm Res Theory 2006;16:417-46.]). J. Edelenbos, E.H. Kleijn (Eds.).
18. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plann Assoc 1969, 35:216-224.
19. Edelenbos J. Process in shape [Ph.D. thesis] 2000, Lemma, Utrecht, ([in Dutch]).
20. Edelenbos J., Kleijn E.H. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. J Public Adm Res Theory 2006, 16:417-446.
21. Edelenbos J., Klok P.J., Van Tatenhove J. The institutional embedding of interactive policy making. Insights for a comparative research based on eight interactive projects in the Netherlands. Am Rev Public Adm 2009, 39:125-148.
22. Hegland T.J., Ounanian K., Raakjaer J. Why and how to regionalise the Common Fisheries Policy. Mar Stud 2012, 11:7.
23. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conser 2008, 141:1417-1431.
24. Young J.C., Jordan A., Searle K.R., Butler A., Chapman D.S., Simmons P., Watt A.D. Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation?. Biol Conser 2013, 158:359-370.