Spatial and temporal fluctuations in individual accessibility: a comparative analysis among subgroups of the population

Geografisk Tidsskrift - Danish Journal of Geography

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 119-131

  Neutens, Tijs ^a   Daniels, Sarah ^a   Minnen, Joeri ^a   Glorieux, Ignace ^a   De Maeyer, Philippe ^a   Van de Weghe, Nico ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

accessibility; social exclusion; space time prism; time geography

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; SOCIAL EXCLUSION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL PLANNING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

BELGIUM; EAST FLANDERS; GHENT;

EID: 84907591844     PISSN: 00167223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2013.863547     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Beckmann, M. J., Golob, T. F., & Zahavi, Y. (1983a). Travel probability fields and urban spatial structure: 2. Empirical tests. Environment and Planning A, 15, 727–738.10.1068/a150727
2. Beckmann, M. J., Golob, T. F., & Zahavi, Y. (1983b). Travel probability fields and urban spatial structure: 1. Theory. Environment and Planning A, 15, 593–606.10.1068/a150593
3. Brannen, J. (2005). Time and the negotiation of work-family boundaries – Autonomy or illusion? Time & Society, 14, 113–131.
4. Breedveld, K. (1998). The double myth of flexibilization – Trends in scattered work hours, and differences in time-sovereignty. Time & Society, 7, 129–143.
5. Buliung, R. N., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2006). A GIS toolkit for exploring geographies of household activity/travel behavior. Journal of Transport Geography, 14, 35–51.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.008
6. Burns, L. D. (1979). Transportation, temporal, and spatial components of accessibility. LexingtonMA: Lexington Books.
7. Casas, I. (2007). Social exclusion and the disabled: An accessibility approach. Professional Geographer, 59, 463–477.10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00635.x
8. Casas, I., Horner, M. W., & Weber, J. (2009). A comparison of three methods for identifying transport-based exclusion: A case study of children’s access to urban opportunities in Erie and Niagara Counties, New York. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3, 227–245.10.1080/15568310802158761
9. Castaigne, M., Cornelis, E., Frederix, R., Tampere, C., Toint P., Viti, F., & Walle, F 2009. Behaviour and mobility within the week “BMW” (Final Report). Brussels: Belgian Science Policy. (p. 120).
10. Church, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2003). Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Geographical Analysis, 35, 83–96.10.1353/geo.2002.0029
11. Cullen, I., & Godson, V. (1975). Urban networks: The structure of activity patterns. Progress in Planning, 4, 1–96.10.1016/0305-9006(75)90006-9
12. Delafontaine, M., Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., & Van de Weghe, N. (2011). The impact of opening hours on the equity of individual space–time accessibility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35, 276–288.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.02.005
13. Delafontaine, M., Neutens, T., & Van de Weghe, N. (2011). Modelling potential movement in constrained travel environments using rough space–time prisms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25, 1389–1411.10.1080/13658816.2010.518571
14. Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011). Exploring the relative influences of transport disadvantage and social exclusion on well-being. Transport Policy, 18, 555–562.10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.011
15. Fokkema, T., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2008). Trends in living arrangements in Europe: Convergence or divergence? Demographic Research, 19, 1351–1418.10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.36
16. Glorieux, I., Minnen, J., & Vandeweyer, J. (2005). Technisch verslag bij de tijdsbudgetenquête: Veldwerk en responsanalyse [Technical report of the time use survey: Fieldwork and response analysis] (p. 262). Brussels: Onderzoeksgroep TOR,: Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Vakgroep Sociologie.
17. Glorieux, I., Mestdag, I., & Minnen, J. (2008). The coming of the 24-h economy? Changing work schedules in Belgium between 1966 and 1999. Time & Society, 17, 63–83.
18. Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 7–21.
19. Hanson, S. (2010). Gender and mobility: New approaches for informing sustainability. Gender Place and Culture, 17, 5–23.
20. Hsu, C. I., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2004). Travel and activity choices based on an individual accessibility model. Papers in Regional Science, 83, 387–406.
21. Hubers, C., Schwanen, T., & Dijst, M. (2011). Coordinating everyday life in the Netherlands: A holistic quantitative approach to the analysis of ICT-related and other work-life balance strategies. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 93, 57–80.10.1111/geob.2011.93.issue-1
22. Iacono, M., Krizek, K. J., & El-Geneidy, A. (2009). Measuring non-motorized accessibility: Issues, alternatives, and execution. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 133–140.
23. Iacovou, M., & Skew, A. J. (2011). Household composition across the new Europe: Where do the new Member States fit in? Demographic Research, 25, 465–490.10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.14
24. Jarvis, H. (1999). The tangled webs we weave: Household strategies to co-ordinate home and work. Work, Employment and Society, 13, 225–247.
25. Jarvis, H. (2005). Moving to London time – Household co-ordination and the infrastructure of everyday life. Time & Society, 14, 133–154.
26. Jennrich, R. I., & Turner, F. B. (1969). Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 22, 227–237.10.1016/0022-5193(69)90002-2
27. Kim, H. M., & Kwan, M. P. (2003). Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5, 71–91.10.1007/s101090300104
28. Kruythoff, H. (1993). Urban and suburban types of two-earner households in the Randstad. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 8, 211–236.
29. Kwan, M. P. (2000). Gender differences in space-time constraints. Area, 32, 145–156.10.1111/area.2000.32.issue-2
30. Kwan, M. P., & Hong, X. D. (1998). Network-based constraint-oriented choice set formation using GIS. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5, 139–162.
31. Kwan, M. P., & Lee, J. Y. (2011). Visualisation of socio-spatial isolation based on human activity patterns and social networks in space-time. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 102, 468–485.
32. Kwan, M. P., & Weber, J. (2008). Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land use–travel interaction. Applied Geography, 28, 110–123.10.1016/j.apgeog.2007.07.002
33. Langford, M., & Higgs, G. (2010). Accessibility and public service provision: Evaluating the impacts of the post office network change programme in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 585–601.10.1111/tran.2010.35.issue-4
34. Lucas, K. (2006). Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40, 801–809.10.1016/j.tra.2005.12.005
35. Maher, J. (2009). Accumulating care mothers beyond the conflicting temporalities of caring and work. Time & Society, 18, 231–245.
36. McCray, T., & Brais, N. (2007). Exploring the role of transportation in fostering social exclusion: The use of GIS to support qualitative data. Networks & Spatial Economics, 7, 397–412.
37. McDowell, L., Ward, K., Fagan, C., Perrons, D., & Ray, K. (2006). Connecting time and space: The significance of transformations in women’s work in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 141–158.10.1111/ijur.2006.30.issue-1
38. Miller, H. J. (1991). Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5, 287–301.10.1080/02693799108927856
39. Miller, H. J. (1999). Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis, 31, 187–212.
40. Miller, H. J. (2007). Place-based versus people-based geographic information science. Geography Compass, 1, 503–535.10.1111/geco.2007.1.issue-3
41. Musterd, S., & van Zelm, I. (2001). Polycentricity, households and the identity of places. Urban Studies, 38, 679–696.10.1080/00420980120035286
42. Neutens, T., Delafontaine, M., Scott, D., & De Maeyer, P. (2011a). An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space-time accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 1131–1154.
43. Neutens, T., Delafontaine, M., Scott, D., & De Maeyer, P. (2011b). A GIS-based method to identify spatiotemporal gaps in public service delivery. Applied Geography, 32, 253–264.
44. Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., & Witlox, F. (2011c). The prism of everyday life: Towards a new research agenda for time geography. Transport Reviews, 31, 25–47.10.1080/01441647.2010.484153
45. Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., Witlox, F., & de Maeyer, P. (2010). Evaluating the temporal organization of public service provision using space-time accessibility analysis. Urban Geography, 31, 1039–1064.10.2747/0272-3638.31.8.1039
46. Newsome, T. H., Walcott, W. A., & Smith, P. D. (1998). Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions. Transportation, 25, 357–377.10.1023/A:1005082827030
47. Páez, A., Gertes Mercado, R., Farber, S., Morency, C., & Roorda, M. J. (2010). Relative accessibility deprivation indicators for urban settings: Definitions and application to food deserts in Montreal. Urban Studies, 47, 1415–1438.10.1177/0042098009353626
48. Preston, J., & Rajé, F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 151–160.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
49. Schönfelder, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2003). Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion? Transport Policy, 10, 273–286.10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.07.002
50. Schwanen, T. (2007). Gender differences in chauffeuring children among dual-earner families. Professional Geographer, 59, 447–462.10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00634.x
51. Schwanen, T., & de Jong, T. (2008). Exploring the juggling of responsibilities with space-time accessibility analysis. Urban Geography, 29, 556–580.10.2747/0272-3638.29.6.556
52. Schwanen, T., Kwan, M. P., & Ren, F. (2008). How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space–time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum, 39, 2109–2121.10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.002
53. Scott, D. M., & Horner, M. W. (2008). Examining the role of urban form in shaping people’s accessibility to opportunities: An exploratory spatial data analysis. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1, 89–119.
54. Skinner, C. (2005). Coordination points: A hidden factor in reconciling work and family life. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 99–119.
55. Southerton, D. (2006). Analysing the temporal organization of daily life: Social constraints, practices and their allocation. Sociology, 40, 435–454.10.1177/0038038506063668
56. Stanley, J., & Lucas, K. (2009). Special Issue of the journal of Transport Policy focusing on International perspectives on transport and social exclusion. Transport Policy, 16, 89–89.10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.03.001
57. Verhetsel, A., Thomas, I., Van Hecke, E., & Beelen, M. (2007). Pendel in België [Commuting in Belgium: Part I]. Deel I: Woon-Werkverplaatsingen. Federal Public Service Economy.
58. Zandvliet, R., & Dijst, M. (2005). Research Note – The Ebb and flow of temporary populations: The dimensions of spatial-temporal distributions of daytime visitors in the Netherlands. Urban Geography, 26, 353–364.10.2747/0272-3638.26.4.353
59. Zandvliet, R., & Dijst, M. (2006). Short-term dynamics in the use of places: A space–time typology of visitor populations in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 43, 1159–1176.10.1080/00420980500406702