On the adjustment of inconsistent data using the Birge ratio

Metrologia

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 516-521

  Bodnar, Olha ^a   Elster, Clemens ^a  

^a PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Birge ratio; general location scale model; modified Birge adjustment

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; INFERENCE ENGINES;

95% CREDIBLE INTERVALS; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; BIRGE RATIO; COMBINED MEASUREMENTS; LOCATION-SCALE DISTRIBUTIONS; MODIFIED BIRGE ADJUSTMENT; POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTIONS; SCALE MODELING;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84907586103     PISSN: 00261394     EISSN: 16817575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/51/5/516     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Mohr P J and Taylor B N 2005 CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 1-107
2. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures 1999 (CIPM revision 2003) Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates issued by National Metrology Institutes
3. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology 2008 Evaluation of Measurement Data - Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (Sèvres: BIPM) JCGM 100:2008
4. Zhang N F 2006 The uncertainty associated with the weighted mean of measurement data Metrologia 49 195-204
5. Birge R T 1932 The calculation of errors by the method of least squares Phys. Rev. 40 207-27
6. CCQM 2012 CCQM Guidance Note: Estimation of a Consensus KCRV and Associated Degrees of Equivalence (CCQM).
7. Weise K and Wöger W 2000 Removing model and data non-conformity in measurement evaluation Meas. Sci. Technol. 11 1649-58
8. Gläser M, Borys M, Ratschko D and Schwartz R 2010 Redefinition of the kilogram and the impact on its future dissemination Metrologia 47 419-28
9. Toman B, Fischer J and Elster C 2012 Alternative analyses of measurements of the Planck constant Metrologia 49 567-71
10. Berger J O and Bernardo J M 1992 On the development of the reference prior method Bayesian Stat. 4 35-60
11. Kacker R N, Forbes A, Kessel R and Sommer K-D 2008 Classical and Bayesian interpretation of the Birge test of consistency and its generalized version for correlated results from interlaboratory evaluations Metrologia 45 257-64
12. Kacker R N 2004 Combining information from interlaboratory evaluations using a random effects model Metrologia 41 132-6
13. Toman B and Possolo A 2009 Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons Accred. Qual. Assur. 14 553-63
14. Kruschke J K 2013 Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 142 573-603
15. Huber P J and Ronchetti E M 2009 Robust Statistics (New York: Wiley)
16. Ghosh J K, Delampady M and Samanta T 2006 An Introduction to Bayesian Analysis (New York: Springer)
17. Rousseeuw P J and Leroy A M 1996 Robust Regression and Outlier Detection (New York: Wiley)
18. Gupta A K, Varga T and Bodnar T 2013 Elliptically Contoured Models in Statistics and Portfolio Theory (New York: Springer)
19. Fernández C and Steel M F J 1999 Reference priors for the general location-scale model Stat. Probab. Lett. 43 377-84
20. Datta G S and Mukerjee R 2004 Probability Matching Priors: Higher Order Asymptotics (New York: Springer)
21. Berger J O 1985 Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis (New York: Springer).