Hybrid technique of cortical bone trajectory and pedicle screwing for minimally invasive spine reconstruction surgery: A technical note

Journal of Medical Investigation

Volumn 61, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 388-392

  Takata, Yoichiro ^a   Matsuura, Tetsuya ^a   Higashino, Kosaku ^a   Sakai, Toshinori ^a   Mishiro, Takuya ^a   Suzue, Naoto ^a   Kosaka, Hirofumi ^a   Hamada, Daisuke ^a   Goto, Tomohiro ^a   Nishisho, Toshihiko ^a   Goda, Yuichiro ^a   Sato, Ryosuke ^a   Tsutsui, Takahiko ^a   Tonogai, Ichiro ^a   Tezuka, Fumitake ^a   Mineta, Kazuaki ^a   Kimura, Tetsuya ^a   Nitta, Akihiro ^a   Higuchi, Tadahiro ^a   Hama, Shingo ^a   Sairyo, Koichi ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cortical bone trajectory; Fusion surgery; Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis; Pedicle screw

Indexed keywords

ABSENCE OF COMPLICATIONS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORTICAL BONE TRAJECTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION SCORE; LUMBAR SPINE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; SKIN INCISION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE RECONSTRUCTION; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; PLASTIC SURGERY; PROCEDURES; SPINE FUSION;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PEDICLE SCREWS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;

EID: 84907562798     PISSN: 13431420     EISSN: 13496867     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2152/jmi.61.388     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MA, Womack WJ, Puttlitz CM: Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 9(5): 366-73, 2009
2. Weinstein JN, Rydevik BL, Rauschning W: Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res (284): 34-46, 1992
3. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K: In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(4): E240-5, 2014
4. Japanese Orthopaedic Association: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Assessment Criteria Guidelines Manual. Tokyo: JOA; 1996: 46-49.
5. Pan L, Zhang P, Yin Q. Comparison of tissue damages caused by endoscopic lumbar discectomy and traditional lumbar discectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2014 Feb 28. pii: S1743-9191(14)00054-5.
6. Sasaoka R1, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Terai H, Takaoka K: Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy. Eur Spine J 15(5): 577-82, 2006
7. Huang TJ, Hsu RW, Li YY, Cheng CC: Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Res 23(2): 406-11, 2005
8. Lehmann W, Ushmaev A, Ruecker A, Nuechtern J, Grossterlinden L, Begemann PG, Baeumer T, Rueger JM, Briem D: Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model. Eur Spine J 17(6): 857-63, 2008
9. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K: Morphometric Measurement of Cortical Bone Trajectory for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Computed Tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech 26: E248-E253, 2013