Developing an analytical framework for reconstructing the scalar reorganization of water governance as institutional change: The case of Southern Spain

Ecological Economics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2014, Pages 378-391

  Thiel, Andreas ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Andalusia; Eco institutional setting; Governance; Institutional change; Scale; Water

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECENTRALIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL REFORM; NATURAL RESOURCE; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANDALUCIA; GUADALQUIVIR BASIN; SPAIN;

EID: 84907484391     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Agudo Zamora M.J. La reforma del Estatuto de Autonomia para Andalucia: Contexto e inicio. Actualidad 03/05 2005, Centro de Estudios Andaluces, Sevilla.
2. Benz A. Politik in Mehrebenensystemen 2009, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
3. Börzel T.A., Risse T. Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe. Politics of Europeanization 2003, 57-80.
4. Boyd J., Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63(2-3):616-626.
5. Brenner N. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood 2004, Oxford University Press, New York.
6. Bressers H., Kuks S. Integrated Governance and Water Basin Management: Conditions for Regime Change and Sustainability 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
7. Bromley D.W. The Commons, Common Property and Environmental Policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1992, 2(1):1-17.
8. Bromley D.W. Volitional pragmatism. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68:1-13.
9. Bukowski J. Spanish water policy and the national hydrological plan: an advocacy coalition approach to policy change. South Eur. Soc. Polit. 2007, 12(1):39-57.
10. CEC (Commission of the European Community) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2000, Official Journal L 327, 22/12/2000, p. 0001- 0073 (CEC, Brussels).
11. Chhotray V., Stoker G. Governance Theory and Practice: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach 2010, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire.
12. Confederacion Hidrografica del Guadalquivir Redaccion de la propuesta del plan hidrologico del Guadalquivir. Anexo II, Usos y demandas 1994.
13. Confederacion Hidrografica del Guadalquivir Esquema provisional de temas importantes del segundo ciclo de planificacion hidrologica: Esquema provisional de temas importantes 2015-2021: Demarcación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir 2013.
14. Consejería de Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Andalucía Medio Ambiente en Andalucía Informe 2008 2008, Consejería de Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla.
15. Corominas Masip, J., undated. Hacia unas nuevas administraciones del Agua en Espana: unpublished Power Point Presentation.
16. Dahlmann C.J. The problem of externality. J. Law Econ. 1979, 22:141-162.
17. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41(3):393-408.
18. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7(3):260-272.
19. del Moral L. Integración de políticas sectoriales: agua y territorio: Fundación Nueva Cultura del Agua. Vicerrectorado de Doctorado, Universidad de Sevilla, Pabellón de México (Avda. de la Palmera). Panel científico-técnico de seguimiento de la política de aguas, 24 January 2007, Sevilla 2007.
20. Falkner G., Hartlapp M., Treib O. Worlds of compliance: why leading approaches to European union implementation are only 'sometimes-true theories'. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 2007, 46(3):395-416.
21. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(3):643-653.
22. Font N., Subirats J. Water management in Spain: the role of policy entrepreneurs in shaping change. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15(2). (Art. 25).
23. Garrido A., Calatrava J. Trends in water pricing and markets. Water Policy in Spain 2010, 131-144. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden. A. Garrido (Ed.).
24. Garrido A., Varela Ortega C. Economía del agua en la agricultura e integración de políticas sectoriales: Panel científico-técnico de seguimiento de la política de aguas 2007, 1-33. Convenio Universidad de Sevilla-Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Sevilla.
25. Hagedorn K. Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2008, 35(4):357-384.
26. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis 2010, 110-139. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D. Raffaelli, C. Frid (Eds.).
27. Harsanyi J.C. Advances in understanding rational behavior. Rational Choice 1986, New York University Press, Washington Square, N.Y. J. Elster (Ed.).
28. Hedström P., Ylikoski P. Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2010, 36(1):49-67. 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632.
29. Howitt R. Scal. A Companion to Political Geography 2003, 132-157. Publishing Ltd, Malden, MA, USA. J. Agnew, K. itcell, G. Toal (Eds.).
30. Huffmann J.L. Comprehensive river basin management: the limits of collaborative, stakeholder-based, water governance. Nat. Resour. J. 2009, 49:118-149.
31. Huitema D., Bressers H. Scaling water governance: the case of the implementation of the European water framework directive in the Netherlands. Paper Presented at the Synthesis Conference of the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Program, Bali, Indonesia 2006.
32. Johnston R.J., Russell M. An operational structure for clarity in ecosystem service values. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70(12):2243-2249.
33. Jones N.A., Ross H., Lynam T., Perez P., Leitch A. Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol. Soc. 2011, 16(1). (Art. 46).
34. Jordan A., Lenschow A. Greening the European union: what can be learned from the leaders of EU environmental policy. Eur. Environ. 2000, 10:109-120.
35. Junta de Andalucia Estatuto de Autonomía para Andalucía.: Texto aprobado por el congreso de los diputados 2007, Junta de Andalucia, Sevilla.
36. Junta de Andalucia - Consejería de Medio Ambiente Acuerdo Andaluz por el agua 2009, Junta de Andalucia, Sevilla.
37. Kerr J. Watershed management: lessons from common property theory. Int. J. Commons 2007, 1(1):89-109.
38. Knight J. Institutions and Social Conflict 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Knight J. Models, Interpretations, and Theorie: Constructing Explanations of Institutional Emergence and Change. Explaining social institutions 1995, 95-119. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. J. Knight, I. Sened (Eds.).
40. Lankford B.H.N. The cathedral and the bazaar: monocentric and polycentric river basin management. Water Altern. 2010, 3(1):82-101.
41. Lefebvre M., Espinosa M., Gomez y Paloma S. The Influence of the Common Agricultural Policy on Agricultural Landscapes: JRC Scientific and Policy Reports 2012, European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Seville.
42. Libecap G.D. Contracting for Property Rights 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [England], New York.
43. Lin J.Y. An economic theory of institutional change: induced and imposed change. Cato J. 1989, 9(1):1-33.
44. Lopez-Gunn E. Agua para todos: the new regionalist hydraulic paradigm in Spain. Water Altern. 2009, 2(3):370-394.
45. Marini M.M., Singer B. Causality in the social sciences. Sociol. Methodol. 1988, 18:347. 10.2307/271053.
46. Marston S.A. The social construction of scale. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2000, 24(2):219-242.
47. Martinez-Herrera E., Miley T.J. The constitution and the politics of national identity in Spain. Nations Nationalism 2010, 16(1):6-30.
48. Meyer C., Thiel A. Institutional change in water management collaboration: implementing the European water framework directive in the Eastern German Odra basin. Water Policy 2012, 14(4):625-646.
49. MIMAM (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente) Plan Hidrológico Nacional 2001, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
50. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino - Confederación Hidrográfica del Gudalquivir Esquema de Temas Importantes - Demarcación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir 2010, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Sevilla.
51. Molle F. Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: insights from the water sector. Water Altern. 2008, 1(1):131-156.
52. Mollinga P.P., Meinzen-Dick R.S., Merrey D.J. Politics, plurality and problem sheds: a strategic approach for reform of agricultural water resources management. Dev. Policy Rev. 2007, 25(6):699-719.
53. Moss T. The governance of land use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU water framework directive. Land Use Policy 2004, 21(1):85-94.
54. Moss T. Spatial fit, from panacea to practice: implementing the EU water framework directive. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17(3 (2)).
55. Mostert E., Craps M., Pahl-Wostl C. Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management?. Water Int. 2008, 33(3):293-304.
56. Mueller D.C. Public Choice III 2003, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
57. Nahlik A.M., Kentula M.E., Fennessy M.S., Landers D.H. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 77:27-35.
58. North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
59. Elinor Ostrom, Roy Gardner, and James Walker, Rules, Games, and Common Pool Resources 1994, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
60. Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
61. Pahl-Wostl C., Mostert E., Tabara D. The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13(1). (Art. 24).
62. Pahl-Wostl C., Jeffrey P., Isendahl N., Brugnach M. Maturing the new water management paradigm: progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resour. Manag. 2011, 25:837-856. 10.1007/s11269-010-9729-2.
63. Poteete A.R., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice 2010, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
64. Putnam R.D. Diplomacy and domestic politics - the logic of 2-level games. Int. Organ. 1988, 42(3):427-460.
65. Sauri D., del Moral L. Recent developments in Spanish water policy. Alternatives and conflicts at the end of the hydraulic age. Geoforum 2001, 32(3):351-362.
66. Schlager E. A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. Theories of the Policy Process 1999, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. P.A. Sabatier (Ed.).
67. Schlager E., Blomquist W.A. Embracing Watershed Politics 2008, University Press of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
68. Schlüter A. Institutional change and ecological economics: the role of mental models and sufficient reason. Institutions and Sustainability. Political Economy of Agriculture and the Environment - Essays in Honour of Konrad Hagedorn 2009, Springer, Dordrecht. V. Beckmann, M. Padmanabhan (Eds.).
69. Schmid A.A. Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and Behavioral Economics 2004, Blackwell, Malden, MA.
70. Strauss A.L., Corbin J.M. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 1998, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. 2nd ed.
71. Swyngedouw E. Neither global or local: 'glocalisation' and the politics of scale. Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local 1997, 137-166. The Guilford Press, New York. K. Cox (Ed.).
72. Swyngedouw E. Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1999, 89(3):443-465.
73. Theesfeld I. A Common Pool Resource in Transition: Determinants of Institutional Change for Bulgaria's Postsocialist Irrigation Sector 2005, Shaker, Aachen.
74. Thiel A., Egerton C. Re-scaling of resource governance as institutional change: the case of water governance in Portugal. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2011, 54(3):383-402.
75. Thiel A., Schleyer C., Plieninger T. Wolves are mobile while fruit trees are not! How characteristics of resources and supranational regulatory frameworks shape the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Germany. Environ. Policy Gov. 2012, 22(3):189-204.
76. Tsebelis G. Decision-making in political-systems - veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. Br. J. Polit. 1995, 25(Part 3):289-325.
77. Vatn A. Multifunctional agriculture: some consequences for international trade regimes. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2002, 29(3):309-327.
78. Vatn A. Institutions and the Environment 2005, Elgar, Cheltenham.
79. Vatn A. Resource Regimes and cooperation. Land Use Policy 2007, 24(4, Special Issue):624-632.
80. Wilson J.A. Scientific Uncertainty, Complex Systems, and the Design of Common-Pool Institutions 2001, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
81. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1994, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi. 2nd ed.
82. Young O.R. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
83. Young O.R., Underdal A. Institutional dimensions of global change IHDP scoping report. International Human Dimensions Programme of Global Environmental Change, Bonn, Germany 1997.