A broader view of the Cathedral: The significance of the liability rule, correcting a misapprehension

Law and Contemporary Problems

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1-13

  Calabresi, Guido ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907434273     PISSN: 00239186     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Jules Coleman, Corrective Justice and Wrongful Gain, 11 J. LEGAL STUD. 421 (1982).
2. John C.P. Goldberg & Benjamin C. Zipursky, Seeing Tort Law from the Internal Point of View: Holmes and Hart on Legal Duties, 75 FORDHAM L. REV. 1563 (2006).
3. Izhak Englard, The System Builders: A Critical Appraisal of Modern American Tort Theory, 9 J. LEGAL STUD. 27 (1980).
4. Guido Calabresi, Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts, 70 YALE L.J. 499 (1961).
5. Guido Calabresi, Fault, Accidents and the Wonderful World of Blum and Kalven, 75 YALE L.J. 216 (1965).
6. Walter J. Blum & Harry Kalven, Jr., The Empty Cabinet of Dr. Calabresi: Auto Accidents and General Deterrence, 34 U. CHI. L. REV. 239 (1967).
7. Steven G. Medema, Juris Prudence: Calabresi's Uneasy Relationship with the Coase Theorem, 77 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS., no. 2, 2014 at 65, 85.
8. John C.P. Goldberg & Benjamin C. Zipursky, Torts as Wrongs, 88 TEX. L. REV. 917, 918 (2010).
9. Marc A. Franklin, Personal Injury Accidents in New Zealand and the United States: Some Striking Similarities, 27 STAN. L. REV. 653 (1975).
10. Geoffrey Palmer, The New Zealand Experience, 15 U. HAW. L. REV. 604 (1993).
11. Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 HARV. L. REV. 457, 462 (1897).
12. Karl L. Llewellyn, A Realistic Jurisprudence-The Next Step, 30 COLUM. L. REV. 431, 437 (1930).
13. Gary S. Becker, Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach, 76 J. POL. ECON. 169 (1968).
14. John J. Donohue, III & Justin Wolfers, Estimating the Impact of the Death Penalty on Murder, 11 AM. L. ECON. REV. 249 (2009).
15. CESARE BECCARIA, The Death Penalty, in ON CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS AND OTHER WRITINGS 66 (Richard Bellamy ed., Richard Davies trans., 1995) (1764).
16. CHARLES L. BLACK, JR., CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: THE INEVITABILITY OF CAPRICE AND MISTAKE (1974).
17. Guido Calabresi, Civil Recourse Theory's Reductionism, 88 IND. L.J. 449, 465-66 (2013)
18. Guido Calabresi, The Complexity of Torts-The Case of Punitive Damages, in EXPLORING TORT LAW 333 (M. Stuart Madden ed., 2005).
19. Richard A. Posner, Instrumental and Noninstrumental Theories of Tort Law, 88 IND. L.J. 469 (2013).
20. Guido Calabresi & A. Douglas Melamed, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, 85 HARV. L. REV. 1089 (1972).
21. Robert Cooter, Prices and Sanctions, 84 COLUM. L. REV. 1523 (1984).
22. Guido Calabresi, Torts-The Law of the Mixed Society, 56 TEX. L. REV. 519, 526-29 (1978).
23. Keith N. Hylton, A Missing Markets Theory of Tort Law, 90 NW. U. L. REV. 977, 980 (1996).
24. Eugene Kontorovich, The Constitution in Two Dimensions: A Transaction Cost Analysis of Constitutional Remedies, 91 VA. L. REV. 1135, 1143-44 (2005).
25. Margaret Jane Radin, Market-Inalienability, 100 HARV. L. REV. 1849, 1864 (1987).
26. R.H. COASE, Notes on the Problem of Social Cost, in THE FIRM, THE MARKET, AND THE LAW 157, 159 (1988).
27. LEON TROTSKY, SOVIET ECONOMY IN DANGER: THE EXPULSION OF ZINOVIEV 29-30 (1933).
28. GUIDO CALABRESI & PHILIP BOBBITT, TRAGIC CHOICES 154-57 (1978).
29. Guido Calabresi, Inaugural Lecture of the Academic Year of the International University College of Turin: Merit Goods, the Commons, and Their Significance for Justice, Efficiency, and Equality (May 19, 2011), available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQnLakWMycM).
30. RICHARD A. MUSGRAVE, THE THEORY OF PUBLIC FINANCE 13-15 (1959).
31. James Tobin, On Limiting the Domain of Inequality, 13 J.L. & ECON. 263, 267 (1970).
32. A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell, Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis, 111 HARV. L. REV. 869, 887-96 (1998).
33. Catherine M. Sharkey, Punitive Damages as Societal Damages, 113 YALE L.J. 347, 363-72 (2003).
34. W. Kip Viscusi, Jurors, Judges, and the Mistreatment of Risk by the Courts, 30 J. LEGAL STUD. 107, 111-15 (2001).
35. Susan Rose-Ackerman, Inalienability and the Theory of Property Rights, 85 COLUM. L. REV. 931 (1985).
36. DAN B. DOBBS, THE LAW OF TORTS $ 302 (2000).
37. Anita Bernstein, Keep It Simple: An Explanation of the Rule of No Recovery for Pure Economic Loss, 48 ARIZ. L. REV. 773 (2006).
38. GUIDO CALABRESI, IDEALS, BELIEFS, ATTITUDES, AND THE LAW: PRIVATE LAW PERSPECTIVES ON A PUBLIC LAW PROBLEM 72-76 (1985).
39. MORTON J. HORWITZ, THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN LAW, 1780-1860, at 63-108 (1977).
40. Robert L. Rabin, The Historical Development of the Fault Principle: A Reinterpretation, 15 GA. L. REV. 925 (1981).
41. Jack L. Goldsmith & Alan O. Sykes, Lex Loci Delictus and Global Economic Welfare: Spinozzi v. ITT Sheraton Corp., 120 HARV. L. REV. 1137, 1137-42 (2007)
42. Giuseppe Franco Ferrari, Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, in INTRODUCTION TO ITALIAN PUBLIC LAW 255, 271-72.
43. David de Sola, Souter's Home an Activist Target, CNN.COM (Jan. 22, 2006, 11:39 AM), http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/21/eminent.domain/.
44. Lee Anne Fennell, Just Enough, 113 COLUM. L. REV. SIDEBAR 109 (2013).
45. Brian Angelo Lee, Just Undercompensation: The Idiosynccratic Premium in Eminent Domain, 113 COLUM. L. REV. 593 (2013).
46. RICHARD A. EPSTEIN, TAKINGS: PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN 170-75 (1985).
47. Sally T. Hillsman, Fines and Day Fines, 12 CRIME & JUST. 49 (1990).
48. Charles A. Reich, The New Property, 73 YALE L.J. 733 (1964).
49. Guido Calabresi, Conclusioni, in FRA INDIVIDUO E COLLETTIVITà: LA PROPRIETà NEL SECOLO XXI 239, 239 (2013).
50. Jan G. Deutsch, Neutrality, Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court: Some Intersections Between Law and Political Science, 20 STAN. L. REV. 169, 169-74 (1968).
51. Guido Calabresi, You Can Call it Thucydides or You Can Call it Mustard Plaster, but it's All Proximate Cause Just the Same!, 91 YALE L.J. 1 (1981).