Correlation between intereye difference in visual field mean deviation values and relative afferent pupillary response as measured by an automated pupillometer in subjects with glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 419-423

  Sarezky, Daniel ^a   Krupin, Theodore ^a   Cohen, Aaron ^b   Stewart, Charles Wm ^b   Volpe, Nicholas J ^a   Tanna, Angelo P ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Konan Medical USA ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

pupil; pupillography; RAPD

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFERENT PUPILLARY RESPONSE; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PUPILLOMETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTEREYE DIFFERENCE; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPILLOGRAPHY; PUPILLOMETER; STANDARD AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; DARK ADAPTATION; DEVICES; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PUPIL; VERY ELDERLY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DARK ADAPTATION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUPIL; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84907423755     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31827b1522     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Wu JX, et al. Frequency of asymmetric visual field defects in normal-Tension and hightension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:988-991
2. Lankaranian D, Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, et al. The usefulness of a new method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;103:200-207
3. Kalaboukhova L, Fridhammar V, Lindblom B. Relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma: A pupillometric study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:519-525
4. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. Mosby Inc.: St. Louis, MO; 1999
5. Thompson HS. Otto lowenstein, pioneer pupillographer. J Neuroophthalmol. 2005;25:44-49
6. Lowenstein O, Loewenfeld IE. Electronic pupillography; a new instrument and some clinical applications. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958;59:352-363
7. Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120: 622-633
8. Volpe NJ, Plotkin ES, Maguire MG, et al. Portable pupillography of the swinging flashlight test to detect afferent pupillary defects. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1913-1921
9. Volpe NJ, Dadvand L, Kim SK, et al. Computerized binocular pupillography of the swinging flashlight test detects afferent pupillary defects. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34:606-613
10. Lagrèze WD, Kardon RH. Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and estimated retinal ganglion cell loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236:401-404
11. Wilhelm H, Peters T, Lüdtke H, et al. The prevalence of relative afferent pupillary defects in normal subjects. J Neuroophthalmol. 2007;27:263-267