Population analysis of the perfect breast: A morphometric analysis

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 134, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 436-447

  Mallucci, Patrick ^a   Branford, Olivier A ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BREAST; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84907312885     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000485     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Mallucci P, Branford OA. Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: Analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:8-16.
2. Hsia HC, Thomson JG. Differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:312-320; discussion 321.
3. Weum S, de Weerd L, Kristiansen B. Form stability of the Style 410 anatomically shaped cohesive silicone gel-filled breast implant in subglandular breast augmentation evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:409-413.
4. Hedén P, Bronz G, Elberg JJ, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:430-436; discussion 437-438.
5. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Bengtson BP. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: Core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32: 709-717.
6. Jewell ML, Jewell JL. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:51-65.
7. Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: The high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:2005-2016.
8. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:81S-98S; discussion 99S-102S.
9. Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:188S-196S; discussion 197S-198S.
10. Adams WP Jr, Mallucci P. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:597e-611e.
11. Penn J. Breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg. 1955;7:357-371.
12. Hauben DJ, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D. Breast-areola-nipple proportion. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:510-513.
13. Brody GS. The perfect breast: Is it attainable? Does it exist? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1500-1503.
14. Tebbetts JB, Teitelbaum S. High-and extra-high-projection breast implants: Potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2150-2159.