Assessment of the complementarity of temperature and flow-rate for response normalisation of aerosol-based detectors

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1356, Issue , 2014, Pages 180-187

  Khandagale, Manish M ^a   Hilder, Emily F ^a   Shellie, Robert A ^a   Haddad, Paul R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

C CAD response normalisation; Flow rate gradient; Post column solvent addition; Temperature gradient separation

Indexed keywords

AEROSOLS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DETECTORS; MIXTURES; SOLVENTS; THERMAL GRADIENTS; WATER INJECTION;

CONCENTRATION LEVELS; FLOW-RATE GRADIENT; GRADIENT SEPARATIONS; IMPURITY PROFILING; ISOCRATIC MOBILE PHASE; NORMALISATION; POST-COLUMN; SOLVENT DEPENDENCIES;

ATMOSPHERIC MOVEMENTS;

ACETONITRILE; FUROSEMIDE; INDAPAMIDE; PREDNISOLONE; SULFADIMIDINE; SULFAMERAZINE; SULFAMETHAXAZOLE; SULFAMETHIZOLE; SULFAMETOXYDIAZINE; SULFONAMIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; AEROSOL; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CORONA CHARGED AEROSOL DETECTION; CORONA CHARGED AEROSOL DETECTOR; EVAPORATIVE LIGHT SCATTERING DETECTOR; FLOW RATE; FLOW RATE PROGRAMMING; INVERSE GRADIENT SOLVENT COMPENSATION APPROACH; ISOCRATIC MOBILE PHASE CONDITION; ISOCRATIC TEMPERATURE GRADIENT SEPARATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; TEMPERATURE;

C-CAD RESPONSE NORMALISATION; FLOW RATE GRADIENT; POST-COLUMN SOLVENT ADDITION; TEMPERATURE GRADIENT SEPARATION;

ACETONITRILES; AEROSOLS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; HYDRODYNAMICS; METHANOL; PREDNISOLONE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLVENTS; SULFANILAMIDES; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84907271563     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.055     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mathews B.T., Higginson P.D., Lyons R., Mitchell J.C., Sach N.W., Snowden M.J., Taylor M.R., Wright A.G. Improving quantitative measurements for the evaporative light scattering detector. Chromatographia 2004, 60:625-633.
2. Hutchinson J.P., Li J., Farrell W., Groeber E., Szucs R., Dicinoski G., Haddad P.R. Universal response model for a corona charged aerosol detector. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:7418-7427.
3. S. Ball, I. Agilent Technologies, Universal quantification using the Agilent 385-ELSD Evaporative Light Scattering Detector, http://www.chem.agilent.com/Library/technicaloverviews/Public/5990-9159EN.pdf (accessed on 9 January 2014).
4. Gorecki T., Lynen F., Szucs R., Sandra P. Universal response in liquid chromatography using charged aerosol detection. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78:3186-3192.
5. Villiers A.d., Gorecki T., Lynen F., Szucs R., Sandra P. Improving the universal response of evaporative light scattering detection by mobile phase compensation. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1161:183-191.
6. Heinisch S., Rocca J.L. Sense and nonsense of high-tempearature liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:642-658.
7. Teutenberg T. Potential of high temperature liquid chromatography for the improvement of separation efficiency - A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 643:1-12.
8. McNeff C., Yan B., Stoll D., Henry R. Practice and theory of high temperature liquid chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30:1672-1685.
9. Vanhoenacker G., Sandra P. Elevated temperature and temperature programming in conventional liquid chromatography - fundamentals and applications. J. Sep. Sci. 2006, 29:1822-1835.
10. Yang Y. Subcritical water chromatography: A green approach to high-temperature liquid chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30:1131-1140.
11. Wiese S., Teutenberg T., Schmidt T.C. General strategy for performing temperature programming in high performance liquid chromatography: prediction of linear temperature gradients. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83:2227-2233.
12. Wiese S., Teutenberg T., Schmidt T.C. A general strategy for performing temperature-programming in high performance liquid chromatography--further improvements in the accuracy of retention time predictions of segmented temperature gradients. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1222:71-80.
13. Causon T.J., Cortes H.J., Shellie R.A., Hilder E.F. Temperature Pulsing for Controlling Chromatographic Resolution in Capillary Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84:3362-3368.
14. Yang Y., Kapalavavi B. Subcritical water chromatography-an economical and green separation technique. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry 2011, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK. R.A. Meyers (Ed.).
15. Houdiere F., Fowler P.W.J., Djordjevic N.M. Combination of Column Temperature Gradient and Mobile Phase Flow Gradient in Microcolumn and Capillary Column High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69:2589-2593.
16. Moore L.K., Synovec R.E. Axial thermal gradient microbore liquid chromatography by flow programming. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65:2663-2670.
17. Snyder L.R. Comparisons of Normal Elution, Coupled-Columns, and Solvent, Flow or Temperature Programming in Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1970, 8:692-706.
18. Deeb S., Schepers U., Wätzig H. Fast HPLC method for the determination of glimepiride, glibenclamide, and related substances using monolithic column and flow program. J. Sep. Sci. 2006, 29:1571-1577.
19. Nesterenko P.N., Rybalko M.A. Separation of homologues of organic compounds using the gradient of the eluent flow rate on a monolithic porous column. J. Anal. Chem. 2005, 60:349-354.
20. Righezza M., Guiochon G. Effects of the Nature of the Solvent and Solutes on the Response of a Light Scattering Detector. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1988, 11:1967-2004.
21. Novakova L., Lopez S., Solichova D., Satinsky D., Kulichova B., Solich P. Comparison of UV and charged aerosol detection approach in pharmaceutical analysis of statins. Talanta 2009, 78:834-839.
22. Hutchinson J.P., Li J., Farrell W., Groeber E., Szucs R., Dicinoski G., Haddad P.R. Comparison of the response of four aerosol detectors used with ultra high pressure liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:1646-1655.
23. Dixon R.W., Peterson D.S. Development and testing of a detection method for liquid chromatography based on aerosol charging. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74:2930-2937.
24. Guiochon G., Moysan A., Holley C. Influence of Various Parameters on the Response Factors of the Evaporative Scattering Detector For a Number of Non-Volatile Compounds. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1988, 11:2547-2570.
25. Shaodong J., Lee W.J., Ee J.W., Park J.H., Kwon S.W., Lee J. Comparison of ultraviolet detection, evaporative light scattering detection and charged aerosol detection methods for liquid-chromatographic determination of anti-diabetic drugs. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51:973-978.
26. Stolyhwo A., Colin H., Guiochon G. Use of Light Scattering as a detector principle in liquid chromatography. J.Chromatogr. 1983, 265:1-18.
27. Mourey T., Oppenheimer L. Principles of operation of an evaporative light scattering detector for liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1984, 56:2427-2434.
28. Khandagale M.M., Hutchinson J.P., Dicinoski G.W., Haddad P.R. Effects of eluent temperature and elution bandwidth on detection response for aerosol-based detectors. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1308:96-103.
29. Nukiyama S., Tanasawa Y. Experiments on the atomization of liquids in an air stream. Report 3: On the Droplet-size Distribution in an Atomized Jet 1939, Trans. Soc. Mech. Eng., Japan.
30. Yang Y., Belghazi M., Lagadec A., Miller D.J., Hawthorne S.B. Elution of organic solutes from different polarity sorbents using subcritical water. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 810:149-159.
31. Vazquez G., Alvarez E., Navaza J.M. Surface Tension of Alcohol Water+Water from 20 to 50 .degree.C. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1995, 40:611-614.