Characterizing accuracy and precision of glucose sensors and meters

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 980-985

  Rodbard, David ^a  

^a Biomedical Informatics Consultants LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

accuracy; bias; Bland Altman plot; Clarke error grid; continuous glucose monitoring; diabetes mellitus type 1; diabetes mellitus type 2; glucose monitoring; mean absolute relative deviation (MARD); Parkes error grid; precision; precision absolute relative deviation (PARD); self monitoring of blood glucose; statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE SENSOR; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARD; ANALYSIS; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC;

EID: 84907209801     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296814541810     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Garg S, Zisser H, Schwartz S, et al. Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-Time continuous glucose sensor. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:44-50.
2. Wilson DM, Beck RW, Tamborlane WV, et al. The accuracy of the FreeStyle Navigator continuous glucose monitoring system in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(1):59-64.
3. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. The accuracy of the Guardian RT continuous glucose monitor in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10(4):266-272.
4. Mastrototaro J, Shin J, Marcus A, Sulur G. The accuracy and efficacy of real-Time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10(5):385-390.
5. Zisser HC, Bailey TS, Schwartz S, Ratner RE, Wise J. Accuracy of the SEVEN® continuous glucose monitoring system: comparison with frequently sampled venous glucose measurements. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(5):1146-1154.
6. Garg SK, Smith J, Beatson C, Lopez-Baca B, Voelmle M, Gottlieb PA. Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(2):65-72.
7. Keenan DB, Cartaya R, Mastrototaro JJ. Accuracy of a new real-Time continuous glucose monitoring algorithm. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(1):111-118.
8. Luijf YM, Avogaro A, Benesch C, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring accuracy results vary between assessment at home and assessment at the clinical research center. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(5):1103-1106.
9. Damiano ER, El-Khatib FH, Zheng H, Nathan DM, Russell SJ. A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(2):251-259.
10. Damiano ER, McKeon K, El-Khatib FH, Hui Zheng H, Nathan DM, Russell SJ. A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors: The Navigator, G4 Platinum, and Enlite [published online ahead of print April 21, 2014]. J Diabetes Sci Technol. doi:10.1177/1932296814532203.
11. Mahmoudi Z, Dencker Johansen M, Christiansen JS, Hejlesen OK. A multistep algorithm for processing and calibration of microdialysis continuous glucose monitoring data. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(10):825-835.
12. Rodbard D. Statistical quality control and routine data processing for radioimmunoassays and immunoradiometric assays. Clin Chem. 1974;20(10):1255-1270.
13. Rodbard D. Quality control for RIA: recommendations for a minimal program. In: Symposium on Radioimmunoassay and Related Procedures in Medicine 1977. Vol. 2. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1978:21-38.
14. Munson PJ, Rodbard D. An elementary components of variance analysis for multi-center quality control. In: In: Symposium on Radioimmunoassay and Related Procedures in Medicine 1977. Vol. 2. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1978:105-125.
15. Dudley RA, Edwards P, Ekins RP, et al. Guidelines for immunoassay data processing. Clin Chem. 1985;31(8):1264-1271.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med. 1990;20(5): 337-340.
17. Geary RC. The ratio of the mean deviation to the standard deviation as a test of normality. Biometrika. 1935;27(3/4):310-332.
18. Doncaster CP, Davey AJH. Analysis of Variance and Covariance: How to Choose and Construct Models for the Life Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
19. Reinsch CH. Smoothing by spline functions. Numerische Mathematik. 1967;10:177-183.
20. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Locally-weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83(403):596-610.
21. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley.
22. Rodbard D, Lewald JE. Computer analysis of radio-ligand assay and radioimmunoassay data. Acta Endocr. 1970;64(suppl 147):79-103.
23. Deming WE. Statistical Adjustment of Data. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1943.
24. Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983;21:709-720.
25. Weinstein RL, Schwartz SL, Brazg RL, Bugler JR, Peyser TA, McGarraugh GV. Accuracy of the 5-day FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: comparison with frequent laboratory reference measurements. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1125-1130.
26. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for selfmonitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10(5): 622-628.
27. Pfötzner A, Klonoff DC, Pardo S, Parkes JL. Technical aspects of the Parkes error grid. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(5): 1275-1281.
28. Obermaier K, Schmelzeisen-Redeker G, Schoemaker M, Klötzer HM, Kirchsteiger H, Eikmeier H, del Re L. Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(4):824-832.
29. Clarke WL, Anderson S, Farhy L, et al. Evaluating the clinical accuracy of two continuous glucose sensors using continuous glucose-error grid analysis. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10): 2412-2417.