Invisible, but how? The depth of unconscious processing as inferred from different suppression techniques

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue SEP, 2014, Pages

  Dubois, Julien ^a   Faivre, Nathan ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907170457     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01117     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kim, C.-Y. & Blake, R. Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible "invisible". Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 381-8 (2005).
2. Breitmeyer, B. G., Ro, T. & Ogmen, H. A comparison of masking by visual and transcranial magnetic stimulation: implications for the study of conscious and unconscious visual processing. Conscious. Cogn. 13, 829-43 (2004).
3. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K. & Caramazza, A. Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 15214-8 (2008).
4. Kanai, R., Walsh, V. & Tseng, C. Subjective discriminability of invisibility: a framework for distinguishing perceptual and attentional failures of awareness. Conscious. Cogn. 19, 1045-57 (2010).
5. Faivre, N., Berthet, V. & Kouider, S. Nonconscious influences from emotional faces: a comparison of visual crowding, masking, and continuous flash suppression. Front. Psychol. 3, 129 (2012).
6. Landry, M., Appourchaux, K. & Raz, A. Elucidating unconscious processing with instrumental hypnosis. Front. Psychol. 5, 1-18 (2014).
7. Tsuchiya, N. & Koch, C. Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1096-101 (2005).
8. Tsuchiya, N., Koch, C., Gilroy, L. a LA & Blake, R. Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. J. Vis. 6, 1068-1078 (2006).
9. Jiang, Y., Costello, P. & He, S. Processing of invisible stimuli: advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression. Psychol. Sci. 18, 349-55 (2007).
10. Yang, E., Brascamp, J., Kang, M.-S. & Blake, R. On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness. Front. Psychol. 5, 724 (2014).
11. Gayet, S., Van der Stigchel, S. & Paffen, C. L. E. Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield. Front. Psychol. 5, 460 (2014).
12. Stein, T. & Sterzer, P. Unconscious processing under interocular suppression: getting the right measure. Front. Psychol. 5, 387 (2014).
13. Sterzer, P., Stein, T., Ludwig, K., Rothkirch, M. & Hesselmann, G. Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review. Front. Psychol. 5, 453 (2014).
14. Faivre, N., Berthet, V. & Kouider, S. Sustained invisibility through crowding and continuous flash suppression: a comparative review. Front. Psychol. 5, 475 (2014).
15. Herzog, M., Hermens, F. & Ogmen, H. Invisibility & Interpretation. Front. Psychol. 5, 975 (2014).
16. Sandberg, K., Del Pin, S. H., Bibby, B. M. & Overgaard, M. Evidence of weak conscious experiences in the exclusion task. Front. Psychol. 5, 1080 (2014).
17. Kaunitz, L. N., Fracasso, A., Skujevskis, Ma¨ & Melcher, D. W depth of inter-ocular suppression with transient and sustained targets. Front. Psychol. 5, 1-10 (2014).
18. Peremen, Z. & Lamy, D. Comparing unconscious processing during continuous flash suppression and meta-contrast masking just under the limen of consciousness. Front. Psychol. 5, 969 (2014).
19. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z. & Caramazza, A. The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychol. Sci. 21, 772-8 (2010).
20. Izatt, G., Dubois, J., Faivre, N. & Koch, C. A direct comparison of unconscious face processing under masking and interocular suppression. Front. Psychol. 5, 1-11 (2014).
21. Fogelson, S. V, Kohler, P. J., Miller, K. J., Granger, R. & Tse, P. U. Unconscious neural processing differs with method used to render stimuli invisible. Front. Psychol. 5, 601 (2014).