Climate Change in the Newsroom: Journalists’ Evolving Standards of Objectivity When Covering Global Warming

Science Communication

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 428-453

  Hiles, Sara Shipley ^a   Hinnant, Amanda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

climate change; environmental journalism; objectivity; sociology of news; transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907146131     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547014534077     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Antilla L.Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change.Global Environmental Change. 2005;15:338-352
2. Atton C.An alternative Internet: Radical media, politics and creativity. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press; 2004:
3. Avery E. J.,Lariscy R. W.,Sohn Y.Public information officers’ and journalists’ perceived barriers to providing quality health information.Health Communication. 2009;24:327-336
4. Berglez P.Inside, outside, and beyond media logic: Journalistic creativity in climate reporting.Media, Culture & Society. 2011;33:449-465
5. Besley J. C.,McComas K. A.Reporting on fairness in civic life.Journalism Practice. 2007;1:339-355
6. BlockB. (2010). Covering climate change. World Watch, 23(2). Retrieved from http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6373
7. Boyce T.Journalism and expertise.Journalism Studies. 2006;7:889-906
8. BoykoffM. (2005). The disconnect of news reporting from scientific evidence. Nieman Reports, Winter2005, 86-87. Retrieved from http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/article/100593/The-Disconnect-of-News-Reporting-From-Scientific-Evidence.aspx
9. Boykoff M.Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006.Area. 2007a;39:470-481
10. Boykoff M.From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2007b;32:477-489
11. BoykoffM. (2010, February). U.S. climate coverage in the ‘00s. Extra! Retrieved from http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/u-s-climate-coverage-in-the-00s/
12. Boykoff M.,Boykoff J.Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press.Global Environmental Change. 2004;14:125-136
13. Brossard D.,Shanahan J.,McComas K.Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change.Mass Communication and Society. 2004;7:359-377
14. Chew F.,Mandelbaum-Schmid J.,Gao S. K.Can health journalists bridge the state-of-the-science gap in mammography guidelines?.Science Communication. 2006;27:331-351
15. Collins H. M.Certainty and the public understanding of science: Science on television.Social Studies of Science. 1987;17:689-713
16. Collins H. M.,Evans R.Rethinking expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2008:
17. Detjen J.,Fico F.,Li X.,Kim Y.Changing work environment of environmental reporters.Newspaper Research Journal. 2000;21:2-12
18. Dewerth-Pallmeyer D.The audience in the news. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996:
19. Dunwoody S.Weight-of-evidence reporting: What is it? Why use it?.Nieman Reports. 2005;54 (4): 89-91
20. Ettema J. S.Crafting cultural resonance.Journalism. 2005;6:131-152
21. Ettema J. S.,Glasser T. L.Custodians of conscience: Investigative journalism and public virtue. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1998:
22. Gelbspan R.Disinformation, financial pressures, and misplaced balance.Nieman Reports, Winter. 2005;2005:77-79
23. Gilligan E. A re-examination of reporters’ norms and the routines used to maintain them.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre; 2006Dresden, Germany; 2006.
24. Gitlin T.The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. (2003). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left (1st ed., with a new preface). Berkeley: University of California Press.Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003:
25. Glaser B. G.,Strauss A.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967:
26. Greenberg J.,Knight G.,Westersund E.Spinning climate change: Corporate and NGO public relations strategies in Canada and the United States.International Communication Gazette. 2011;73:65-82
27. Greenberg N.,Thomas S.,Murphy D.,Dandeker C.Occupational stress and job satisfaction in media personnel assigned to the Iraq War (2003).Journalism Practice. 2007;1:356-371
28. Herman E.,Chomsky N.Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York, NY: Pantheon; 1988:
29. Hinnant A.,Len-Ríos M. E.Tacit understandings of health literacy: Interview and survey research with health journalists.Science Communication. 2009;31:84-115
30. Kovach B.,Rosenstiel T.The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. New York, NY: Random House; 2007:
31. Lam A.Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework.Organization Studies. 2000;21:487-513
32. Lindlof T. R.,Taylor B. C.Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011:
33. Lippmann W.Public opinion. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1922:
34. Liu X.,Vedlitz A.,Alston L.Regional portrayals of global warming and climate change.Environmental Science & Policy. 2008;11:379-393
35. Luscombe A.Radio journalists and how they describe their written copy.Journal of Media Practice. 2009;10:5-15
36. Maibach E.,Leiserowitz A.,Cobb S.,Shank M.,Cobb K. M.,Gulledge J.The legacy of Climategate: Undermining or revitalizing climate science and policy?.Climate Change. 2012;3:289-295
37. McComas K.,Shanahan J.Telling stories about global climate change.Communication Research. 1999;26:30-57
38. McCracken G.The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988:
39. MeyerP. (2004, September20). As media audience fragments, trust—not objectivity—is what matters. USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2004-09-19-opcom_x.htm
40. Mindich D.Just the facts: How “objectivity” came to define American journalism. New York: New York University Press; 1998:
41. MooreM. (2009, September14). Transparency in journalism—a new meme?[Martin Moore blog]. Retrieved from http://martinjemoore.com/transparency-in-journalism-a-new-meme/
42. Nisbet M. C.Nature’s prophet: Bill McKibben as journalist, public intellectual and activist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Shorenstein Center on Press, Politics and Public Policy; 2013:
43. Oreskes N.Beyond the ivory tower: The scientific consensus on climate change.Science. 2004 1686;306:
44. Palen J. A.Objectivity as independence: Creating the Society of Environmental Journalists, 1989-1997.Science Communication. 1999;21:156-171
45. More say there is solid evidence of global warming. Washington, DC: Author; 2012:
46. Platon S.,Deuze M.Indymedia journalism: A radical way of making, selecting and sharing news?.Journalism. 2003;4:336-355
47. Polanyi M.Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London, England: Routledge; 1958:
48. Rakow L. F.Commentary: Interviews and focus groups as critical and cultural methods.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2011;88:416-428
49. Reed R.(Un-)Professional discourse? Journalists’ and scientists’ stories about science in the media.Journalism. 2001;2:279-298
50. Revkin A. (2009, October 20). Thought experiments on birth and death [Web log post.]. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/thought-experiments-on-sex-and-death/
51. Sachsman D. B.,Simon J.,Valenti J.Regional issues, national norms: A four-region analysis of U.S. environmental reporters.Science Communication. 2006;28:93-121
52. Schiller D.Objectivity and the news: The public and the rise of commercial journalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1978:
53. Schön D. A.The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1983:
54. Schudson M.Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1978:
55. Skovsgaard M.,Albæk E.,Bro P.,de Vreese C.A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm.Journalism. 2013;14:22-42
56. Soffer O.The competing ideals of objectivity and dialogue in American journalism.Journalism. 2009;10:473-491
57. Stocking S. H.Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Friedman S. M.Dunwoody S.Rogers C. L., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999:23-42.
58. Sumpter R.Daily newspaper editor’s audience construction routines: A case study.Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2000;17:334-346
59. Trumbo C.Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in U.S. news coverage of an environmental issue.Public Understanding of Science. 1996;5:269-283
60. Tuchman G.Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity.American Journal of Sociology. 1972;77:660-679
61. Tuchman G.Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York, NY: Free Press; 1978:
62. Usher N.Recovery from disaster.Journalism Practice. 2009;3:216-232
63. Vos T.,Craft S.,Ashley S. New media, old criticism: Bloggers’ press criticism and the journalistic field. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication; 2010Denver, CO; 2010.
64. Ward B.Communicating on climate change: An essential resource for journalists, scientists and educators. Narragansett: Metcalf Institute for Marine & Environmental Reporting, University of Rhode Island; 2008:
65. WeinbergerD. (2009, July 19).Transparency is the new objectivity [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/07/19/transparency-is-the-new-objectivity/
66. White D. M.The gatekeeper: A case study in the selection of news.Journalism quarterly. 1950;27 (4): 383-390
67. Wiesslitz C.,Ashuri T.“Moral journalists”: The emergence of new intermediaries of news in an age of digital media.Journalism. 2011;12:1035-1051
68. Yin R.Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:
69. Zehr S.Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9:85-103