Cost-effectiveness analysis reveals microsurgical varicocele repair is superior to percutaneous embolization in the treatment of male infertility

Canadian Urological Association Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 9-10, 2014, Pages e619-e625

  Kovac, Jason Ronald ^a   Fantus, Jake ^b   Lipshultz, Larry I ^b   Fischer, Marc Anthony ^c   Klinghoffer, Zachery ^d  

^a Male Reproductive Endocrinology and Surgery   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d Rogue Valley Health System   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907029817     PISSN: 19116470     EISSN: 19201214     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1873     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol 2005; 174: 1926-31; discussion 1931.
2. Lipshultz L, Thomas A, Khera M. Surgical Management of Male Infertility. In: Wein A, ed. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: PA; Saunders; 2007.
3. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1971; 22: 469-74.
4. Diegidio P, Jhaveri JK, Ghannam S, et al. Review of current varicocelectomy techniques and their outcomes. BJU Int 2011; 108: 1157-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09959.x
5. Cozzolino DJ, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele as a progressive lesion: positive effect of varicocele repair. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 55-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.1.55
6. Pinto KJ, Kroovand RL, Jarow JP. Varicocele related testicular atrophy and its predictive effect upon fertility. J Urol 1994; 152: 788-90.
7. Witt MA, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele: A progressive or static lesion? Urology 1993; 42: 541-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(93)90268-F
8. Li F, Yamaguchi K, Okada K, et al. Significant improvement of sperm DNA quality after microsurgical repair of varicocele. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2012; 58: 274-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/19396368 .2012.692431
9. Esteves SC, Oliveira FV, Bertolla RP. Clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile men with treated and untreated clinical varicocele. J Urol 2010; 184: 1442-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.004
10. Mehta A, Goldstein M. Varicocele repair for nonobstructive azoospermia. Curr Opin Urol 2012; 22: 507-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e328358e27b
11. Kim ED, Leibman BB, Grinblat DM, et al. Varicocele repair improves semen parameters in azoospermic men with spermatogenic failure. J Urol 1999; 162: 737-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199909010-00031
12. Dewire DM, Thomas AJ Jr, Falk RM, et al. Clinical outcome and cost comparison of percutaneous embolization and surgical ligation of varicocele. J Androl 1994; 15: 38S-42S.
13. Nabi G, Asterlings S, Greene DR, et al. Percutaneous embolization of varicoceles: Outcomes and correlation of semen improvement with pregnancy. Urology 2004; 63: 359-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.026
14. Shlansky-Goldberg RD, VanArsdalen KN, Rutter CM, et al. Percutaneous varicocele embolization versus surgical ligation for the treatment of infertility: Changes in seminal parameters and pregnancy outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8: 759-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(97)70657-2
15. Cassidy D, Jarvi K, Grober E, et al. Varicocele surgery or embolization: Which is better? Can Urol Assoc J 2012; 6: 266-8.
16. Penson DF, Paltiel AD, Krumholz HM, et al. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for varicocele related infertility. J Urol 2002; 168: 2490-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64175-4
17. Schlegel PN. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A costeffectiveness analysis. Urology 1997; 49: 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00379-2
18. Kroese AC, de Lange NM, Collins J, et al. Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD000479.
19. Liu X, Zhang H, Ruan X, et al. Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: What's the intraoperative difference? World J Urol 2013; 31: 603-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0950-x. Epub 2012 Sep 22.
20. Ficarra V, Crestani A, Novara G, et al. Varicocele repair for infertility: What is the evidence? Curr Opin Urol 2012; 22: 489-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e328358e115
21. Chan P. Management options of varicoceles. Indian J Urol 2012; 27: 65-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.78431
22. Ding H, Tian J, Du W, et al. Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int 2012; 110: 1536-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11093.x
23. Kim J, Shin JH, Yoon HK, et al. Persistent or recurrent varicocoele after failed varicocoelectomy: Outcome in patients treated using percutaneous transcatheter embolization. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 359-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.10.007
24. Moon KH, Cho SJ, Kim KS, et al. Recurrent varicoceles: Causes and treatment using angiography and magnification assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy. Yonsei Med J 2012; 53: 723-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2012.53.4.723
25. Care MoHaL-T. Schedule of Benefits for Physician Services under the Health Insurance Act; 2012. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/ohip/sob/physserv/physserv-mn.html. Accessed August 4, 2014.
26. Klinghoffer Z, Tarride JE, Novara G, et al. Cost-utility analysis of radical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy in the management of small renal masses: Adjusting for the burden of ensuing chronic kidney disease. Can Urol Assoc J 2013; 7: 108-13.
27. Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, et al. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 455-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.008
28. Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioglu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: A meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl 2009; 30: 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.108.005967