Comparison of statistical tests for group differences in brain functional networks

NeuroImage

Volumn 101, Issue , 2014, Pages 681-694

  Kim, Junghi ^a   Wozniak, Jeffrey R ^b   Mueller, Bryon A ^b   Shen, Xiaotong ^c   Pan, Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

ASPU test; Brain network connectivity; High dimensional data; Neuroimaging; Rs fMRI; Statistical power

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SUM OF POWERED SCORE; ADAPTIVE SUM OF POWERED SCORE WEIGHTED VERSION; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CALCULATION; CONNECTOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; DATA ANALYSIS; HISTOGRAM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR SYSTEM; MULTIVARIATE MATRIX DISTANCE REGRESSION; NETWORK BASED STATISTIC; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME; HUMAN; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; CHILD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTOME; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDERS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NERVE NET;

EID: 84907028628     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.031     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis 1990, Wiley, New York.
2. Bray J.R., Curtis J.T. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 1957, 27:325-349.
3. Bullmore E., Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:186-198.
4. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29(3):162-173.
5. Cribben I., Haraldsdottir R., Atlas L., Wager T., Lindquist M. Dynamic connectivity regression: determining state-related changes in brain connectivity. NeuroImage 2012, 61:907-920.
6. Dale A.M., Fischl B., Sereno M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 1999, 9(2):179-194.
7. Eloyan A., Muschelli J., Nebel M.B., Liu H., Han F., Zhao T., Barber A.D., Joel S., Pekar J.J., Mostofsky S.H., Caffo B. Automated diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactive disorder using magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2012, 6(61).
8. Fornito A., Zalesky A., Bullmore E.T. Network scaling effects in graph analytic studies of human resting-state FMRI data. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2010, 4:22.
9. Ge T., Feng J., Hibar D.P., Thompson P.M., Nichols T.E. Increasing power for voxel-wise genome-wide association studies: the random field theory, least square kernel machines and fast permutation procedures. NeuroImage 2012, 63(2):858-873.
10. Greve D.N., Fischl B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. NeuroImage 2009, 48(1):63-72. doi: S1053-8119(09)00675-2.
11. Habeck C., Moeller J.R. Intrinsic functional-connectivity networks for diagnosis: just beautiful pictures?. Brain Connect. 2011, 1:99-103.
12. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning 2001, Springer-Verlag, New York.
13. He Y., Evans A. Graph theoretical modeling of brain connectivity. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2010, 23(4):341-350.
14. Hilgetag C., Kotter R., Stephan K.E., Sporns O. Computational methods for the analysis of brain connectivity. Computational Neuroanatomy: Principles and Methods 2002, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. G. Ascoli (Ed.).
15. Honey C.J., Kotter R., Breakspear M., Sporns O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:10240-10245.
16. Honey C.J., Sporns O., Cammoun L., Gigandet X., Thiran J.P., Meuli R., Hagmann P. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106:2035-2040.
17. Hua W.Y., Ghosh D. Equivalence of kernel machine regression and kernel distance covariance for multidimensional trait association studies Available online at. http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.2679.
18. Huang S., Li J., Sun L., Ye J., Fleisher A., Wu T., Chen K., Reiman E. Learning brain connectivity of Alzheimer's disease by sparse inverse covariance estimation. NeuroImage 2010, 50:935-949.
19. Latora V., Marchiori M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87:198701.
20. Lindquist M. The statistical analysis of fMRI data. Stat. Sci. 2008, 23:439-464.
21. Liu D., Lin X., Ghosh D. Semiparametric regression of multidimensional genetic pathway data: least-squares kernel machines and linear mixed models. Biometrics 2007, 63:1079-1088.
22. Marron J., Todd M.J., Ahn J. Distance-weighted discrimination. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2007, 102:1267-1271.
23. McArdle B.H., Anderson M.J. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 2001, 82:290-297.
24. McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. Generalized Linear Models 1983, Chapman and Hall, London.
25. Meskaldji D.E., Ottet M.C., Cammoun L., Hagmann P., Meuli R., Eliez S., Thiran J.P., Morgenthaler S. Adaptive strategy for the statistical analysis of connectomes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(8).
26. Mostofsky S.H., Powell S.K., Simmonds D.J., Goldberg M.C., Caffo B., Pekar J.J. Decreased connectivity and cerebellar activity in autism during motor task performance. Brain 2009, 132:2413-2425.
27. Nichols T.E., Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests For functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2001, 15:1-25.
28. Onnela J.P., Saramaki J., Kertesz J., Kaski K. Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2005, 71:065103.
29. Pan W. Asymptotic tests of association with multiple SNPs in linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Epidemiol. 2009, 33:497-507.
30. Pan W. Relationship between genomic distance-based regression and kernel machine regression for multi-marker association testing. Genet. Epidemiol. 2011, 35:211-216.
31. Pan W., Kim J., Zhang Y., Shen X., Wei P. A powerful and adaptive association test for rare variants. Genetics 2014, 10.1534/genetics.114.165035.
32. Reiss P.T., Stevens M.H.H., Shehzad Z., Petkova E., Milham M.P. On distance-based permutation tests for between-group comparisons. Biometrics 2010, 66:636-643.
33. Rubinov M., Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 2010, 52:1059-1069.
34. Saad Z.S., Reynolds R.C., Jo H.J., Gotts S.J., Chen G., Martin A., Cox R.W. Correcting brain-wide correlation differences in resting-state fMRI. Brain Connect. 2013, 3(4).
35. Schafer J., Strimmer K. A shrinkage approach to large-scale covariance matrix estimation and implications for functional genomics. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2005, 32:4(1).
36. Shehzad Z., Kelly C2., Reiss P.T., Cameron Craddock R., Emerson J.W., McMahon K., Copland D.A., Xavier Castellanos F., Milham M.P. A multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies. NeuroImage 2014, 93(Part 1):74-94. (Epub 2014 Feb 28). 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.024.
37. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H., et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 2004, 23(Suppl. 1):S208-S219. (doi: S1053-8119(04)00393-3, pii).
38. Smith S.M., Miller K.L., Salimi-Khorshidi G., Webster M., Beckmann C.F., Nichols T.E., Ramsey J.D., Woolrich M.W. Network modelling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage 2011, 54(2):875-891.
39. Smith S.M., Beckmann C.F., Andersson J., Auerbach E.J., Bijsterbosch J., Douaud G., Duff E., Feinberg D.A., Griffanti L., Harms M.P., Kelly M., Laumann T., Miller K.L., Moeller S., Petersen S., Power J., Salimi-Khorshidi G., Snyder A.Z., Vu A.T., Woolrich M.W., Xu J., Yacoub E., Uurbil K., Van Essen D.C., Glasser M.F., WU-Minn HCP Consortium Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage 2012, 80:144-168.
40. Szekely G.J., Rizzo M.L. Testing for equal distributions in high dimension. InterStat 2004, 5.
41. Varoquaux G., Craddock R.C. Learning and comparing functional connectomes across subjects. NeuroImage 2013, 80:405-415.
42. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 1998, 393:440-442.
43. Wei S., Lee C., Wichers L., Marron J.S. Direction-projection-permutation for high dimensional hypothesis tests Available online at. http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0796.
44. Wessel J., Schork N.J. Generalized genomic distance-based regression methodology for multilocus association analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 79:792-806.
45. Woolrich M.W., Jbabdi S., Patenaude B., Chappell M., Makni S., Behrens T., et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. NeuroImage 2009, 45(Suppl. 1):S173-S186. (doi: S1053-8119(08)01204-4, pii).
46. Wozniak J.R., Mueller B.A., Bell C.J., Muetzel R.L., Hoecker H.L., Boys C.J., et al. Global functional connectivity abnormalities in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2013, 37(5):748-756.
47. Zalesky A., Fornito A., Bullmore E.T. Network based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. NeuroImage 2010, 53(4):1197-1207.
48. Zapala M.A., Schork N.J. Multivariate regression analysis of distance matrices for testing associations between gene expression patterns and related variables. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:19430-19435.
49. Zapala M.A., Schork N.J. Statistical properties of multivariate distance matrix regression for high-dimensional data analysis. Front. Genet. 2012, 3:190.
50. Zhang Y., Xu Z., Shen X., Pan W., for the ADNI Testing for association with multiple traits in generalized estimation equations, with application to neuroimaging data. NeuroImage 2014, 96:309-325.
51. Zhou C., Zemanova L., Zamora G., Hilgetag C.C., Kurths J. Hierarchical organization unveiled by functional connectivity in complex brain networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97:238103.