RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: Use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques

Asian Journal of Andrology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 715-719

  Wang, Jin Guo ^a   Huang, Jiaoti ^b   Chin, Arnold I ^b  

^a THE FIRST HOSPITAL OF JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

magnetic resonance imaging; nerve sparing; prostate cancer; robot.assisted radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINENCE; CONVALESCENCE; DEMOGRAPHY; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GLEASON SCORE; HEMATURIA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; NERVE SPARING; NERVE SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR RECURRENCE; ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; CANCER GRADING; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; INNERVATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; ORGAN SPARING TREATMENTS; PERIPHERAL NERVES; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84907013435     PISSN: 1008682X     EISSN: 17457262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.129942     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Jayram G, Decastro GJ, Large MC, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease: a review of short-term outcomes from a high-volume center. J Endourol 2011; 25: 455-7.
2. Stroup SP, Kane CJ. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: technical considerations and review of the literature. ISRN Urol 2011; 2011: 201408.
3. Tewari AK, Ali A, Metgud S, Theckumparampil N, Srivastava A, et al. Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing. World J Urol 2013; 31: 471-80.
4. Ginzburg S, Nevers T, Staff I, Tortora J, Champagne A, et al. Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. JSLS 2012; 16: 443-50.
5. Roethke MC, Lichy MP, Kniess M, Werner MK, Claussen CD, et al. Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2013; 31: 1111-6.
6. Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2009; 74: 619-23.
7. Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Allen C. How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol 2006; 50: 1163-74.
8. Mazaheri Y, Hricak H, Fine SW, Akin O, Shukla-Dave A, et al. Prostate tumor volume measurement with combined T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted MR: correlation with pathologic tumor volume. Radiology 2009; 252: 449-57.
9. Lim HK, Kim JK, Kim KA, Cho KS. Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection-A multireader study. Radiology 2009; 250: 145-51.
10. McClure TD, Margolis DJ, Reiter RE, Sayre JW, Thomas MA, et al. Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Radiology 2012; 262: 874-83.
11. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998; 280: 969-74.
12. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz CM, Balch DG, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6 th ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
13. King CR. The timing of salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84: 104-11.
14. Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JA, Han M, et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 2004; 172: 2227-31.
15. deSouza NM, Riches SF, Vanas NJ, Morgan VA, Ashley SA, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 2008; 63: 774-82.
16. Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Fine J. 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 2005; 293: 2095-101.
17. Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Aronson WJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 203-13.
18. Connolly SS, Cathcart PJ, Gilmore P, Kerger M, Crowe H, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy as the initial step in multimodal therapy for men with high-risk localised prostate cancer: initial experience of 160 men. BJU Int 2012; 109: 752-9.
19. Punnen S, Meng MV, Cooperberg MR, Greene KL, Cowan JE, et al. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer? BJU Int 2013; 112: E314-20.
20. Yee DS, Narula N, Amin MB, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: current evaluation of surgical margins in clinically low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1461-5.
21. Ward JF, Slezak JM, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Zincke H. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome. BJU Int 2005; 95: 751-6.
22. Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A, Kimm S, Menon M, et al. The Role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 918-27.
23. Chandra RV, Heinze S, Dowling R, Shadbolt C, Costello A, et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging staging of prostate cancer. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 860-5.
24. Ahmed HU, Kirkham A, Arya M, Illing R, Freeman A, et al. Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009; 6: 197-206.
25. May F, Treumann T, Dettmar P, Hartung R, Breul J. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2001; 87: 66-9.
26. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 2004; 94: 1071-6.
27. Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, Robinson BD, Shevchuk MM, et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 2011; 108: 984-92.