Preliminary evaluation of a comprehensive provider feedback report

Journal of Medical Practice Management

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 397-405

  Sebek, Kimberly M ^a   Virkud, Arti ^b   Singer, Jesse ^b   Pulgarin, Claudia P ^b   Schreibstein, Lauren ^b   Wang, Jason J ^b  

^a Office of the Executive Deputy Commissioner Division of Mental Hygiene   (United States)

^b NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Clinical informatics; Electronic health record; Health information technology; Healthcare; Healthcare providers; Medical informatics; Primary care physicians; Quality improvement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, MEDICAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84906995205     PISSN: 87550229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hsiao C, Beatty P, Hing E, Woodwell D, Rechtsteiner E, Sisk J. NCHS Health E-Stat. Electronic medical record/electronic health record use by office-based physicians: United States, 2008 and preliminary 2009. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009; www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/emr-ehr/emr-ehr.htm. Accessed December 17, 2012.
2. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:2805-2816.
3. Shekelle P, Morton S, Keeler E. Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006; Apr(132):1-71.
4. Bertrand M. Provider perceptions and epidemiological surveillance data. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32(3):E118-E119.
5. Kiefe C, Allison J, Williams O, Person S, Weaver M, Weissman N. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285:2871-2879.
6. Linder J, Schnipper J, Tsurikova R, et al. Electronic health record feedback to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections. Am JManag Care. 2010;16(12 Suppl HIT):e311-e319.
7. Salazar A, Tyroch A, Smead D. Electronic trauma patient outcomes assessment tool: Performance improvement in the trauma intensive care unit. J. Trauma Nurs. 2011;18:197-201.
8. Wadland W, Holtrop J, Weismantel D, Pathak P, Fadel H, Powell J. Practice-based referrals to a tobacco cessation quit line: Assessing the impact of comparative feedback vs. general reminders. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:135-142.
9. Watts L, Thiel de Bocanegra H, Darney P, et al. In a California program, quality and utilization reports on reproductive health services spurred providers to change. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:852-862.
10. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database SystRev 2012;13(6):CD000259.
11. Mostashari F, Tripathi M, Kendall M. A tale of two large community electronic health record extension projects. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:345-356.
12. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Private performance feedback reporting for physicians: Guidance for community quality collaboratives. November 2012; www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/resources/privfeedbackgdrpt/privfeedbackgdrptintro.html#sectl. Accessed March 23, 2013.
13. Audet A, Doty M, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum S. Physicians Views on Quality Care: Findings from the Commonwealth Fund National Survey of Physicians and Quality of Care. Commonwealth Fund. 2005; www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Fund-Reports/2005/May/Physicians-Views-on-Quality-of-Care-Findings-From-The-Commonwealth-Fund-National-Survey-of-Physicia.aspx. Accessed January 3, 2013.
14. Sargeant J. Toward a common understanding of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28(1):1-4.
15. London M, Sessa VI. Group feedback for continuous learning. Hum Resource Dev Rev. 2006;5:303-329.
16. Vachon B, Desorcy B, Camirand M, et al. Engaging primary care practitioners in quality improvement: making explicit the program theory of an interprofessional education intervention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):106.