Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: Even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2387-2397

  Wilhelm, D ^a,b   Reiser, S ^b   Kohn, N ^b   Witte, M ^c   Leiner, U ^c   Muhlbach L ^c   Ruschin, D ^c   Reiner, W ^c   Feussner, H ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c FRAUNHOFER HEINRICH HERTZ INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Imaging; Laparoscopic monitors; Training courses

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENDOSCOPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGING SYSTEM; LAPAROSCOPIC MONITOR; LAPAROSCOPIST; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MOTION; NEEDLE HOLDER; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPECTACLES; SURGEON; SUTURE; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VELOCITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; WORKLOAD; ANASTOMOSIS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SUTURING METHOD;

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84906940158     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3487-9     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hubber JW, Taffinder N, Russell RC, Darzi A (2003) The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery. Ergonomics 46(10):999-1016 (Pubitemid 36916675)
2. Kunert W, Storz P, Muller S, Axt S, Kirschniak A (2013) [3D in laparoscopy: state of the art]. Chirurg 84(3):202-207
3. Buess GF, van Bergen P, Kunert W, Schurr MO (1996) Comparative study of various 2-D and 3-D vision systems in minimally invasive surgery. Chirurg 67(10):1041-1046 (Pubitemid 126488962)
4. Dion YM, Gaillard F (1997) Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy. Influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera systems. Surg Endosc 11(10):995-1000
5. Pietrabissa A, Scarcello E, Carobbi A, Mosca F (1994) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2(6):315-317
6. Feng C, Rozenblit JW, Hamilton AJ (2010) A computerized assessment to compare the impact of standard, stereoscopic, and high-definition laparoscopic monitor displays on surgical technique. Surg Endosc 24(11):2743-2748
7. Jourdan IC, Dutson E, Garcia A, Vleugels T, Leroy J, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2004) Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy. Br J Surg 91(7):879-885 (Pubitemid 38901355)
8. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A (1999) The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13(11):1087-1092
9. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess GF (1999) Three-dimensional (3-D) video systems: bi-channel or single-channel optics? Endoscopy 31(9):732-737
10. Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24(5):1132-1143
11. Hofmeister J, Frank TG, Cuschieri A, Wade NJ (2001) Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems. Semin Laparosc Surg 8(1):12-24 (Pubitemid 33760566)
12. McLachlan G (2011) From 2D to 3D: the future of surgery? Lancet 378(9800):1368
13. Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, London
14. Mather G, Smith DR (2004) Combining depth cues: effects upon accuracy and speed of performance in a depth-ordering task. Vision Res 44(6):557-562 (Pubitemid 38030306)
15. Schulz CM, Skrzypczak M, Schneider E, Hapfelmeier A, Martin J, Kochs EF, Schneider G (2011) Assessment of subjective workload in an anaesthesia simulator environment: reliability and validity. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28(7):502-505
16. Hagiike M, Phillips EH, Berci G (2007) Performance differences in laparoscopic surgical skills between true high-definition and three-chip CCD video systems. Surg Endosc 21(10):1849-1854 (Pubitemid 47404135)
17. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess GF (2000) The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc 14(1):71-74 (Pubitemid 30036707)
18. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Lederman AB, McClusky DA 3rd, Smith CD (2005) Video-assisted surgery represents more than a loss of three-dimensional vision. Am J Surg 189(1):76-80 (Pubitemid 40215511)
19. Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA (2012) Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc 26(10):2961-2968
20. Kunert W, Storz P, Kirschniak A (2013) For 3D laparoscopy: a step toward advanced surgical navigation: how to get maximum benefit from 3D vision. Surg Endosc 27(2):696-699
21. Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26(5):1454-1460
22. Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK, Chang LS (2000) Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64(3):154-158 (Pubitemid 30326603)
23. Falk V, Mintz D, Grunenfelder J, Fann JI, Burdon TA (2001) Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc 15(11):1282-1288 (Pubitemid 33035404)
24. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146-150 (Pubitemid 38233958)
25. Servos P (2000) Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems. Exp Brain Res 130(1):35-47
26. Otto KJ, Hapner ER, Baker M, Johns MM 3rd (2006) Blinded evaluation of the effects of high definition and magnification on perceived image quality in laryngeal imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115(2):110-113
27. Thomsen MN, Lang RD (2004) An experimental comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic systems in a model. Arthroscopy 20(4):419-423 (Pubitemid 38544429)
28. Rabin J (1995) Two eyes are better than one: binocular enhancement in the contrast domain. Ophthal Physiol Opt 15(1):45-48
29. Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K, Banks MS (2008) Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vision 8(3):1-30
30. Hanna GB, Cresswell AB, Cuschieri A (2002) Shadow depth cues and endoscopic task performance. Arch Surg 137(10):1166-1169 (Pubitemid 35155256)
31. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351(9098):248-251 (Pubitemid 28043949)
32. Mueller-Richter UD, Limberger A, Weber P, Spitzer W, Schilling M (2003) Comparison between three-dimensional presentation of endoscopic procedures with polarization glasses and an autostereoscopic display. Surg Endosc 17(3):502-504 (Pubitemid 36302338)
33. Silvestri M, Simi M, Cavallotti C, Vatteroni M, Ferrari V, Freschi C, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Dario P (2011) Autostereoscopic three-dimensional viewer evaluation through comparison with conventional interfaces in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 18(3):223-230
34. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (2013) Special Session on Medical 3D Visualization on June 27, 2013 and related discussion during the session. In: The 27th International Congress and Exhibition of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Heidelberg, Germany
35. Rogers B (2009) Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception: a retrospective. Perception 38(6):907-911