SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2257-2271

  Stefanidis, Dimitrios ^a   Fanelli, Robert D ^b   Price, Ray ^c   Richardson, William ^d  

^a LEVINE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b GUTHRIE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Intermountain Healthcare   (United States)

^d OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TECHNOLOGY; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; ENDOSCOPY; GENERAL SURGERY; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; ENDOSCOPY; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SAFETY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84906934909     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3587-6     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Club TSS (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073-1078
2. SAGES ASGE (2006) Working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery white paper October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199-203
3. Rattner DW, Hawes R, Schwaitzberg S, Kochman M, Swanstrom L (2011) The Second SAGES/ASGE White Paper on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: 5 years of progress. Surg Endosc 25:2441-2448
4. Surgeons ACo (1994) Statements on emerging surgical technologies and the evaluation of credentials. Bull Am Coll Surg 79:40-41
5. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, Clayman RV, Ahlering TE, Albala DM, Lee DI, Sundaram CP, Matin SF, Castle EP, Winfield HN, Gettman MT, Lee BR, Thomas R, Patel VR, Leveillee RJ, Wong C, Badlani GH, Rha KH, Eggener SE, Wiklund P, Mottrie A, Atug F, Kural AR, Joseph JV (2009) Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol 182:1126-1132
6. Surgery ASfMaB (2009) Position statement on emerging endosurgical interventions for treatment of obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:297-298
7. Biffl WL, Spain DA, Reitsma AM, Minter RM, Upperman J, Wilson M, Adams R, Goldman EB, Angelos P, Krummel T, Greenfield LJ (2008) Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: a position statement of the Society of University Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 206:1204-1209
8. Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Marple BF, VanHeerden J, Kuppersmith RB (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid 20:1327-1332
9. American Urogynecologic Society's Guidelines Development Committee (2012) Guidelines for providing privileges and credentials to physicians for transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:194-197
10. RACS (2007) General guidelines for assessing, approving & introducing new surgical procedures into a hospital or health service. ASERNIP-S. http://www.surgeons.org/media/297973/REA-ASE-3103-P-General-Guidelines-for- Assessing-Approving-Introducing-New-Surgical-Procedures-into-a-Hospital-or- Health-Service.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
11. Stefanidis D, Montero P, Urbach D, Qureshi A, Petersen R, Bachman S, Madan A, Perry K, Pryonr A (2014) SAGES research agenda in gastroinstestinal and endoscopic surgery: updated results of a Delphi study. Surg Endosc (Epub ahead of print)
12. SAGES (2010) Framework for post-residency surgical education & training. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Los Angeles. Updated 2010. http://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/framework- for-post-residency-surgical-education- training/. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
13. SAGES (2010) Guidelines for institutions granting privileges utilizing laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic techniques. Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Los Angeles. http://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/ guidelines-for-institutions-granting- privileges-utilizing-laparoscopic-andor- thoracoscopictechniques/. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
14. Riskin DJ, Longaker MT, Gertner M, Krummel TM (2006) Innovation in surgery: a historical perspective. Ann Surg 244:686-693 (Pubitemid 44629941)
15. Peltola M, Malmivaara A, Paavola M (2012) Introducing a knee endoprosthesis model increases risk of early revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1711-1717
16. Sachdeva AK, Russell TR (2007) Safe introduction of new procedures and emerging technologies in surgery: education, credentialing, and privileging. Surg Clin North Am 87:853-866 (Pubitemid 47410224)
17. Wulsin L, Dougherty A (2008) A briefing on health technology assessment. California State Library, Sacramento. http://library.ca.gov/crb/08/08-019.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
18. SAGES (2009) The definitions document: a reference for use of SAGES guidelines. Society of American Gastroinstestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Los Angeles. http://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/definitions-document- reference-for-use-of-sages-guidelines/. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
19. McGregor M, Brophy JM (2005) End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21:263-267 (Pubitemid 40656557)
20. Spigelman AD (2006) Governance and innovation: experience with a policy on the introduction of new interventional procedures. ANZ J Surg 76:9-13
21. SAGES (2013) TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: LINX® reflux management system. Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Los Angeles. http://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/tavac-safety-and- effectiveness-analysis-linx-reflux-management-system/. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
22. Poulin P, Austen L, Scott CM, Waddell CD, Dixon E, Poulin M, Lafreniere R (2013) Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption. J Health Organ Manag 27:246-265
23. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105-1112
24. The IDEAL Collaboration. http://www.ideal-collaboration.net. Accessed 14 June 2014
25. See WA, Cooper CS, Fisher RJ (1993) Predictors of laparoscopic complications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery. JAMA 270:2689-2692 (Pubitemid 23350965)
26. Lyman S, Sedrakyan A, Do H, Razzano R, Mushlin AI (2011) Infrequent physician use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators risks patient safety. Heart 97:1655-1660
27. Renaud M, Reibel N, Zarnegar R, Germain A, Quilliot D, Ayav A, Bresler L, Brunaud L (2013) Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 23:1753-1760
28. Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Mohr FW (2013) Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation 128:483-491
29. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300-1310
30. Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Singh P, Darzi A, Parakseva P (2013) Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 27:1478-1484
31. Sachdeva AK (2005) Acquiring skills in new procedures and technology: the challenge and the opportunity. Arch Surg 140:387-389
32. AdvaMed (2009) Code of ethics on interactions with health care professionals. Advanced Medical Technology Association, Washington, DC. http://advamed.org/res.download/112. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
33. Chang DC, Easterlin MC, Montesa C, Kaushal K, Wilson SE (2012) Adoption of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in California: lessons for future dissemination of surgical technology. Ann Vasc Surg 26:468-475
34. Sidhu RS, Vikis E, Cheifetz R, Phang T (2006) Self-assessment during a 2-day laparoscopic colectomy course: can surgeons judge how well they are learning new skills? Am J Surg 191:677-681
35. Jelovsek JE, Walters MD, Korn A, Klingele C, Zite N, Ridgeway B, Barber MD (2010) Establishing cutoff scores on assessments of surgical skills to determine surgical competence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:81
36. Sedlack RE (2011) Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc 74:355-366
37. Grigg OA, Farewell VT, Spiegelhalter DJ (2003) Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts. Stat Methods Med Res 12:147-170 (Pubitemid 36347833)
38. Chang WR, McLean IP (2006) CUSUM: a tool for early feedback about performance? BMC Med Res Methodol 6:8
39. Greenberg D, Peterburg Y, Vekstein D, Pliskin JS (2005) Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21:219-227 (Pubitemid 40656551)
40. Annetine C, Gelijns HVD (eds) (1994) Committee on technological innovation in medicine IoM. Adopting new medical technology. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
41. Grunwald T, Krummel T, Sherman R (2004) Advanced technologies in plastic surgery: how new innovations can improve our training and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1556-1567 (Pubitemid 40361970)
42. Patel A, Patel M, Lytle N, Toro JP, Medbery RL, Bluestein S, Perez SD, Sweeney JF, Davis SS, Lin E (2013) Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice? Surg Endosc 28(3):847-853
43. Stefanidis D (2010) Optimal acquisition and assessment of proficiency on simulators in surgery. Surg Clin North Am 90:475-489
44. Ellison EC, Carey LC (2008) Lessons learned from the evolution of the laparoscopic revolution. Surg Clin North Am 88:927-941
45. Bergqvist D (2009) Introduction of new technology: the surgical point of view. Scand J Surg 98:3-7
46. Zietman A, Ibbott G (2012) A clinical approach to technology assessment: how do we and how should we choose the right treatment? Semin Radiat Oncol 22:11-17
47. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924-926 (Pubitemid 351632017)