Governance and innovation: Experience with a policy on the introduction of new interventional procedures

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 76, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 9-13

  Spigelman, Allan D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b Clinical Governance Unit   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adverse events; Clinical audit; Clinical governance; Innovation; New interventional procedures; Patient safety

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; CONSULTATION; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; EVALUATION; EXPERIENCE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MONITORING; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AUSTRALIA; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; POLICY MAKING; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL;

EID: 33645007289     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03648.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Campbell B Maddern G Safety and efficacy of interventional procedures BMJ 2003 326 347 8
2. Terpstra OT Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the other side of the coin BMJ 1996 312 1375 6
3. Jones RM Fletcher DR MacLellan DG et al Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience Aust. N. Z. J. Surg 1991 61 261 6
4. Hawasli A Lloyd LR Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The learning curve: report of 50 patients Am. Surg 1991 57 542 4
5. Sheldon TA Faulkner A Vetting new technologies BMJ 1996 313 508
6. Campbell WB Barnett DB The governance of innovation Br. J. Surg 2004 91 1536 7
7. NICE news in the Annals: NICE interventional procedures programme Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl 2004 86 296
8. Kessler L Ramsey SD Tunis S Sullivan SD Clinical use of medical devices in the 'Bermuda Triangle' Health Aff 2004 23 200 7
9. Strasberg SM Ludbrook PA Who oversees clinical practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J. Am. Coll. Surg 2003 196 938 48