On enhancing blended-learning scenarios through fuzzy logic-based modeling of users' LMS quality of interaction: The rare & contemporary dance paradigms

VISAPP 2014 - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications

Volumn 2, Issue , 2014, Pages 765-772

  Dias, Sofia B ^a   Hadjileontiadis, Leontios J ^b   Diniz, José A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Blended Learning; Fuzzy Logic based Modelling; I Treasures; Learning Scenarios; LMS Moodle; Pedagogical Planning; Quality of Interaction; Rare Contemporary Dance

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; COMPUTER VISION; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

BASED MODELLING; BLENDED LEARNING; LEARNING SCENARIOS; LMS MOODLE; QUALITY OF INTERACTION;

FUZZY LOGIC;

EID: 84906904988     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5220/0004861507650772     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bottino R., Earp J., Olimpo G., Ott M., Pozzi F., Tavella M. (2008). Supporting the design of pilot learning activities with the Pedagogical Plan Manager. In M. Kendall & B. Samways (Eds.) Learning to live in the Knowledge Society, (37-44), Springer.
2. Chatteur, F., Carvalho, L., Dong, A., 2008. Design for Pedagogy Patterns for E-learning. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 341-343). DC: IEEE Computer Society.
3. Collins, M., Berge, Z., 1996. Facilitating interaction in computer mediated online courses. In Proceedings of FSU/AECT Distance Education Conference. http://penta.2.ufrgs.br/ edu/teleduc/wbi/flcc.htm.
4. Dias, S. B., Diniz, J. A., 2013. FuzzyQoI Model: A fuzzy logic-based modelling of users' quality of interaction with a learning management system under blended learning, Computers & Education, 69, 38-59.
5. Dias, S. B., Diniz, J. A., Hadjileontiadis, L. J., 2014. Towards an Intelligent Learning Management System Under Blended Learning: Trends, Profiles and Modelling Perspectives. Springer-Verlag. Berlin/Heidelberg.
6. Garrison, D. R., Kanuka, H., 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Educ., 7, 95-105.
7. Grant, M. R., Thornton, H. R., 2007. Best Practices in undergraduate adult-centered online learning: mechanisms for course design and delivery. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3 (4), 346-356.
8. Herrington, J., Reeves, T., Oliver, C., 2007. Immersive Learning Technologies: Realism and Online Authentic Learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19 (1), 65-84.
9. Hijón, R. N., Velázquez, A. I., 2010. From the discovery of students access patterns in e-learning including Web 2.0 resources to the prediction and enhancement of students outcome, e-learning experiences and future. In S. Soomro (Ed.). E-learning Experiences and Future, InTech (ch. 14, pp. 276-294).
10. Levy, Y. A., Weld, S. D., 2000. Intelligent internet systems. Artificial Intelligence, 118, 1-14.
11. McIsaac, M. S., Blolcher, J. M., Mahes, V., Vrasidas, C., 1999. Student and teacher perceptions of interaction in online computer-mediated communication. Educational Media International, 36 (2), 121-131.
12. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., 1996. Learning How To Learn. Cambridge University Press. New York.
13. Olimpo, G., Bottino, R. M., Earp, J., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., Tavella, M., 2010. Pedagogical plans as communication oriented objects. Computers & Education, 55 (2), 476-488.
14. Ping, T. A., Cheng., A. Y., Manoharan, K., 2010. Students' interaction in the online learning management systems: A comparative study of undergraduate and postgraduate courses. In Proceedings of the AAOU-2010 Annual Conf. (pp. 1-14).
15. Ramos, C., Yudko, E., 2008. "Hits" (not "Discussion Posts") predict student success in online courses: A double cross-validation study. Computers & Education, 50, 1174-1182.
16. Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., 2009. Learning 2.0: The impact of web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. http://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/Learning-2.0.html.
17. Tsoukalas, H.L., Uhrig R.E., 1996. Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering. Wiley & Sons. New York.
18. Wagner, E. D., 1994. In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2), 6-26.
19. Wall, J., 2012. Strategically integrating blended learning to deliver lifelong learning. InTech, ch. 7, 133-148.