Vibration of the organ of Corti within the cochlear apex in mice

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 112, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1192-1204

  Gao, Simon S ^a,b   Wang, Rosalie ^a   Raphael, Patrick D ^a   Moayedi, Yalda ^c   Groves, Andrew K ^c   Zuo, Jian ^d   Applegate, Brian E ^e   Oghalai, John S ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Rice University   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d ST JUDE CHILDREN S RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e Texas A M University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Cochlea; Cochlear amplifier; Electromotility; Hair cell; Hearing; Hearing loss

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL ANCHORED PROTEIN; MOLECULAR MOTOR; PRES PROTEIN, MOUSE; SCLEROPROTEIN; TECTA PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BASILAR MEMBRANE; BIOMECHANICS; CORTI ORGAN; FEMALE; GENETICS; HEARING; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MALE; MOUSE; OUTER HAIR CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; VIBRATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; BASILAR MEMBRANE; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; FEMALE; GPI-LINKED PROTEINS; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY, OUTER; HEARING; MALE; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MOLECULAR MOTOR PROTEINS; ORGAN OF CORTI; VIBRATION;

EID: 84906903146     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00306.2014     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Allen JB, Fahey PF. A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 94: 809-816, 1993.
2. Allen JB, Neely ST. Micromechanical models of the cochlea. Phys Today 45: 40-47, 1992.
3. Applegate BE, Shelton RL, Gao SS, Oghalai JS. Imaging high-frequency periodic motion in the mouse ear with coherently interleaved optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 36: 4716-4718, 2011.
4. Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 227: 194-196, 1985.
5. Cai H, Richter CP, Chadwick RS. Motion analysis in the hemicochlea. Biophys J 85: 1929-1937, 2003.
6. Chen F, Zha D, Fridberger A, Zheng J, Choudhury N, Jacques SL, Wang RK, Shi X, Nuttall AL. A differentially amplified motion in the ear for near-threshold sound detection. Nat Neurosci 14: 770-774, 2011.
7. Chen Z, Milner TE, Dave D, Nelson JS. Optical Doppler tomographic imaging of fluid flow velocity in highly scattering media. Opt Lett 22: 64-66, 1997.
8. Cho SI, Gao SS, Xia A, Wang R, Salles FT, Raphael PD, Abaya H, Wachtel J, Baek J, Jacobs D, Rasband MN, Oghalai JS. Mechanisms of hearing loss after blast injury to the ear. PLos One 8: e67618, 2013.
9. Choi CH, Oghalai JS. Perilymph osmolality modulates cochlear function. Laryngoscope 118: 1621-1629, 2008.
10. Choma MA, Ellerbee AK, Yang C, Creazzo TL, Izatt JA. Spectral-domain phase microscopy. Opt Lett 30: 1162-1164, 2005.
11. Cooper NP, Rhode WS. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea. J Neurophysiol 78: 261-270, 1997.
12. Cooper NP, Rhode WS. Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea-pig cochlea. Hear Res 82: 225-243, 1995.
13. Dallos P, Wu X, Cheatham MA, Gao J, Zheng J, Anderson CT, Jia S, Wang X, Cheng WH, Sengupta S, He DZ, Zuo J. Prestin-based outer hair cell motility is necessary for mammalian cochlear amplification. Neuron 58: 333-339, 2008.
14. Dong W, Olson ES. Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation. Biophys J 105: 1067-1078, 2013.
15. Evans EF, Klinke R. The effects of intracochlear and systemic furosemide on the properties of single cochlear nerve fibres in the cat. J Physiol 331: 409-427, 1982.
16. Frank G, Hemmert W, Gummer AW. Limiting dynamics of high-frequency electromechanical transduction of outer hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 4420-4425, 1999.
17. Fridberger A, Widengren J, Boutet de Monvel J. Measuring hearing organ vibration patterns with confocal microscopy and optical flow. Biophys J 86: 535-543, 2004.
18. Gao SS, Raphael PD, Wang R, Park J, Xia A, Applegate BE, Oghalai JS. In vivo vibrometry inside the apex of the mouse cochlea using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 4: 230-240, 2013.
19. Gavara N, Manoussaki D, Chadwick RS. Auditory mechanics of the tecto-rial membrane and the cochlear spiral. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19: 382-387, 2011.
20. Geisler CD. From Sound to Synapse: Physiology of the Mammalian Ear. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. xiv, 381.
21. Geisler CD, Sang C. A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces. Hear Res 86: 132-146, 1995.
22. Ghaffari R, Aranyosi AJ, Richardson GP, Freeman DM. Tectorial membrane travelling waves underlie abnormal hearing in Tectb mutant mice. Nat Commun 1: 96, 2010.
23. Glasberg BR, Moore BC. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 47: 103-138, 1990.
24. Guinan JJ Jr. How are inner hair cells stimulated? Evidence for multiple mechanical drives. Hear Res 292: 35-50, 2012.
25. Gummer AW, Hemmert W, Zenner HP. Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: its crucial role in frequency tuning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 8727-8732, 1996.
26. Hu X, Evans BN, Dallos P. Direct visualization of organ of corti kinematics in a hemicochlea. J Neurophysiol 82: 2798-2807, 1999.
27. Hubbard A. A traveling-wave amplifier model of the cochlea. Science 259: 68-71, 1993.
28. Karavitaki KD, Mountain DC. Evidence for outer hair cell driven oscillatory fluid flow in the tunnel of corti. Biophys J 92: 3284-3293, 2007a.
29. Karavitaki KD, Mountain DC. Imaging electrically evoked micromechanical motion within the organ of corti of the excised gerbil cochlea. Biophys J 92: 3294-3316, 2007b.
30. Kates JM. Principles of digital dynamic-range compression. Trends Amplif 9: 45-76, 2005.
31. Khanna SM, Hao LF. Reticular lamina vibrations in the apical turn of a living guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 132: 15-33, 1999.
32. Kiang NY, Liberman MC, Sewell WF, Guinan JJ. Single unit clues to cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 22: 171-182, 1986.
33. Legan P, Lukashkina V, Goodyear R, Kossi M, Russell I, Richardson G. A targeted deletion in alpha-tectorin reveals that the tectorial membrane is required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedback. Neuron 28: 273-285, 2000.
34. Liberman M, Gao J, He D, Wu X, Jia S, Zuo J. Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier. Nature 419: 300-304, 2002.
35. Liu CC, Gao SS, Yuan T, Steele C, Puria S, Oghalai JS. Biophysical mechanisms underlying outer hair cell loss associated with a shortened tectorial membrane. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12: 577-594, 2011.
36. Manley GA. Evolutionary paths to mammalian cochleae. J Assoc Res Oto-laryngol 13: 733-743, 2012.
37. Markin VS, Hudspeth AJ. Modeling the active process of the cochlea: phase relations, amplification, and spontaneous oscillation. Biophys J 69: 138-147, 1995.
38. McCormack A, Fortnum H. Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them? Int J Audiol 52: 360-368, 2013.
39. Moayedi Y, Basch ML, Pacheco NL, Gao SS, Wang R, Harrison W, Xiao N, Oghalai JS, Overbeek PA, Mardon G, Groves AK. The candidate splicing factor sfswap regulates growth and patterning of inner ear sensory organs. PLoS Genet 10: e1004055, 2014.
40. Moore BC. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. London: Elsevier Academic, 2004.
41. Mountain DC, Hubbard AE. A piezoelectric model of outer hair cell function. J Acoust Soc Am 95: 350-354, 1994.
42. Mountain DC, Hubbard AE, McMullen TA. Electromechanical processes in the cochlea. In: Mechanics of Hearing, edited by de Boer E and Viergever MA. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University Press, 1983, p. 119-126.
43. Narayan SS, Temchin AN, Recio A, Ruggero MA. Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae. Science 282: 1882-1884, 1998.
44. Neely ST, Kim DO. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 79: 1472-1480, 1986.
45. Nin F, Reichenbach T, Fisher JA, Hudspeth AJ. Contribution of active hair-bundle motility to nonlinear amplification in the mammalian cochlea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 21076-21080, 2012.
46. Nowotny M, Gummer AW. Nanomechanics of the subtectorial space caused by electromechanics of cochlear outer hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 2120-2125, 2006.
47. Nuttall AL, Dolan DF. Steady-state sinusoidal velocity responses of the basilar membrane in guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am 99: 1556-1565, 1996.
48. Olson ES, Duifhuis H, Steele CR. Von Bekesy and cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 293: 31-43, 2012.
49. Peng AW, Ricci AJ. Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification? Hear Res 273: 109-122, 2011.
50. Ren T, Nuttall AL. Basilar membrane vibration in the basal turn of the sensitive gerbil cochlea. Hear Res 151: 48-60, 2001.
51. Ren TY, He WX. Measurement of basilar membrane, reticular lamina, and tectorial membrane vibrations in the intact mouse cochlea. In: What Fire Is in Mine Ears: Progress in Auditory Biomechanics. Melville, NY: AIP, 2011, p. 1403.
52. Rhode WS. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 2: 1218, 1971.
53. Robles L, Ruggero MA. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81: 1305-1352, 2001.
54. Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J Neurosci 11: 1057-1067, 1991.
55. Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Recio A, Narayan SS, Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 101: 2151-2163, 1997.
56. Russell IJ, Legan PK, Lukashkina VA, Lukashkin AN, Goodyear RJ, Richardson GP. Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane. Nat Neurosci 10: 215-223, 2007.
57. Song L, Santos-Sacchi J. Disparities in voltage-sensor charge and electromo-tility imply slow chloride-driven state transitions in the solute carrier SLC26a5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 3883-3888, 2013.
58. Soons J, Puria S, Steele CR. Finite element model of feed-forward/feed-backward amplification in the mouse cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 134: 4063, 2013.
59. Spicer SS, Schulte BA. Differences along the place-frequency map in the structure of supporting cells in the gerbil cochlea. Hear Res 79: 161-177, 1994.
60. Taberner AM, Liberman MC. Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse. J Neurophysiol 93: 557-569, 2005.
61. von Bekesy G. Experiments in Hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.
62. Weddell TD, Mellado-Lagarde M, Lukashkina VA, Lukashkin AN, Zuo J, Russell IJ. Prestin links extrinsic tuning to neural excitation in the mammalian cochlea. Curr Biol 21: R682-R683, 2011.
63. Weitzel EK, Tasker R, Brownell WE. Outer hair cell piezoelectricity: frequency response enhancement and resonance behavior. J Acoust Soc Am 114: 1462-1466, 2003.
64. Xia A, Gao SS, Yuan T, Osborn A, Bress A, Pfister M, Maricich SM, Pereira FA, Oghalai JS. Deficient forward transduction and enhanced reverse transduction in the alpha tectorin C1509G human hearing loss mutation. Dis Model Mech 3: 209-223, 2010.
65. Xia A, Song Y, Wang R, Gao SS, Clifton W, Raphael P, Chao SI, Pereira FA, Groves AK, Oghalai JS. Prestin regulation and function in residual outer hair cells after noise-induced hearing loss. PLos One 8: e82602, 2013.
66. Xia A, Visosky AM, Cho JH, Tsai MJ, Pereira FA, Oghalai JS. Altered traveling wave propagation and reduced endocochlear potential associated with cochlear dysplasia in the BETA2/NeuroD1 null mouse. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8: 447-463, 2007.
67. Xia A, Wooltorton JR, Palmer DJ, Ng P, Pereira FA, Eatock RA, Oghalai JS. Functional prestin transduction of immature outer hair cells from normal and prestin-null mice. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 9: 307-320, 2008.
68. Zha D, Chen F, Ramamoorthy S, Fridberger A, Choudhury N, Jacques SL, Wang RK, Nuttall AL. In vivo outer hair cell length changes expose the active process in the cochlea. PLos One 7: e32757, 2012.
69. Zheng J, Shen W, He DZ, Long KB, Madison LD, Dallos P. Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 405: 149-155, 2000.
70. Zinn C, Maier H, Zenner H, Gummer AW. Evidence for active, nonlinear, negative feedback in the vibration response of the apical region of the in-vivo guinea-pig cochlea. Hear Res 142: 159-183, 2000.
71. Zweig G. Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti. J Acoust Soc Am 89: 1229-1254, 1991.
72. Zwislocki JJ, Kletsky EJ. Tectorial membrane: a possible effect on frequency analysis in the cochlea. Science 204: 639-641, 1979.