Multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE

Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1703-1717

  Liao, Huchang ^a,c   Xu, Zeshui ^b  

^a Shanghai   (China)

^b Sichuan University   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation; intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE; intuitionistic fuzzy set; Multiple criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY PREFERENCE RELATIONS; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PROMETHEE;

EID: 84906820929     PISSN: 10641246     EISSN: 18758967     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/IFS-141137     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. H.M. Adel and T. Madjid, An extensionof the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment, Omega 39 (2011), 373-386.
2. A. Albadvi, Formulating national information technology strategies: A preference ranking model using PROMETHEE method, European Journal of Operational Research 153 (2004), 290-296.
3. A. Albadvi, S.K. Chaharsooghi and A. Esfahanipour, Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE, European Journal of Operational Research 177 (2007), 673-683.
4. S. Angilella, S. Corrente, S. Greco and R. Słowiński, Multiple criteria hierarchy process for the choquet integral, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7811 (2013), 475-489.
5. K.T. Atanassov, lntuitionistic fuzzy sets, in: V. Sgurev, ed., VII ITKR's Session, 1983.
6. K.T. Atanassov On intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory, Springer-Verlag, 2012.
7. M. Behzadian, R.B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi and M. Aghdasi, PROMETHEE: Acomprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, European Journal of Operational Research 200 (2010), 198-215.
8. M. Bernasconi, C. Choirat and R. Seri, The analytic hierarchy process and the theory of measurement, Management Science 56 (2010), 699-711.
9. R.U. Bilsel, G. Büyüközkan and D. Ruan, A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital Web sites, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 21 (2006), 1181-1197.
10. J.P. Brans, L'ingénièrie de la decision; Elaboration d'instruments d'aideà la décision.Laméthode PROMETHEE, in: R. Nadeau, M. Landry, ed., L'aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d'Avenir, Québec, Canada. Presses de l'Université Laval (1982), 183-213.
11. J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal, PROMETHEE V-MCDM problems with segmentation constraints, INFOR 30 (1992), 85-96.
12. J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal, The PROMETHEEVIprocedure: How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems, Journal of Decision Systems 4 (1995), 213-223.
13. J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal, PROMETHEE Methods, in: J. Figueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys 78 (2005), 163-195.
14. A.S. Fernández-Castro and M. Jiménez, PROMETHEE: An extension through fuzzy mathematical programming, Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (2005), 119-122.
15. J.R. Figueira, S. Greco and B. Roy, ELECTRE methods with interaction between criteria: An extension of the concordance index, European Journal of Operational Research 199 (2009), 478-495.
16. J. Geldermann, T. Spengler and O. Rentz, Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: Iron and steel making industry, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115 (2000), 45-65.
17. E. Georgopoulou, Y. Sarafidis, S. Mirasgedis, S. Zaimi and D. Lalas, A multiple criteria decision-aid approach in defining national priorities for greenhouse gases emissions reduction in the energy sector, European Journal of Operational Research 146 (2003), 199-215.
18. M. Goumas and V. Lygerou, An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects, European Journal of Operational Research 123 (2000), 606-613.
19. N. Halouani, H. Chabchoub and J.M. Martel, PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection, European Journal of Operational Research 195 (2009), 841-849.
20. J.F. Le Téno and B. Mareschal, An interval version of PROMETHEE forthe comparisonofbuilding products'design with ill-defined data on environmental quality, European Journal of Operational Research 109 (1998), 522-529.
21. W.X. Li and B.Y. Li, An extension of the Promethee II method based on generalized fuzzy numbers, Expert Systems with Applications 37 (2010), 5314-5319.
22. H.C. Liao and Z.S. Xu, A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 12 (2013a), 373-392.
23. H.C. Liao and Z.S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy priorities of intutionistic preference relations based on multiplicative consistency, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2302495 (2014a) in press.
24. H.C. Liao and Z.S. Xu, Some algorithms for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems (2014b), in press.
25. C. Macharis, J. Springael, K. De Brucker and A. Verbeke, PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP, European Journal of Operational Research 153 (2004), 307-317.
26. S. Opricovic and G.H. Tzeng, Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research 178 (2007), 514-529.
27. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 (2000), 505-518.
28. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, Amount of information and its reliability in the ranking of Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy alternatives, in: E. Rakus-Andersson, R.R. Yager, N. Ichalka-ranje, L. Jain, ed. Recent advances in decision making (Studies in Computational Intelligence), Berlin, Germany: Springer (2009), 7-19.
29. G.H. Tzeng, C.H. Chiang and C.W. Li, Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Systems with Applications 32 (2007), 1028-1044.
30. Z.J. Wang, Derivation of intuitionistic fuzzy weights based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 (2013), 6377-6388.
31. M.C. Wu and T.Y. Chen, The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011), 12318-12327.
32. Z.S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15 (2007a), 1179-1187.
33. Z.S. Xu, Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making, Information Sciences 177 (2007b), 2363-2379.
34. Z.S. Xu and Q.L. Da, An overview of operators for aggregating information, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 18 (2003), 953-969.
35. Z.S. Xu and H.C. Liao, Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2272585 (2013) in press.
36. Z.S. Xu and R.R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems 35 (2006), 417-433.
37. S. Yahya and B. Kingsman, Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: A case study using the analytic hierarchy process method, Journal of Operational Research Society 50 (1999), 916-930.
38. K.J. Zhang, C. Kluck and G. Achari, A comparative approach for ranking contaminated sites based on the risk assessment paradigmusingfuzzyPROMETHEE, EnvironmentalManage-ment 44 (2009), 952-967.