A feedback model and successful e-learning

Learning and Teaching With Technology: Principles and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 232-242

  Lou, Yiping ^a   Dedic, Helena ^b   Rosenfield, Steven ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Vanier College   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906798305     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203416891     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Abrami, P C, Chambers, B, Poulsen, C, De Simone, C, d'Apollonia, S and Howden, J (1995) Classroom Connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning, Harcourt-Brace, Toronto
2. Alalouf, E, Klasa, J, Dedic, H and Rosenfield, S (2002) Conceptual understanding versus algorithmic computation in calculus: Strawman or real conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association de la Recherche Collegial, Quebec, Canada
3. Azevedo, R and Bernard, R M (1995) A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13 (2), pp 111-27
4. Bangert-Drowns, R L, KulikJ A and Morgan, M T (1991) The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events, Review of Educational Research, 61, pp 213-38
5. Blackboard, Inc (2000) Blackboard, version 5, Computer software, Blackboard, Washington, DC
6. Butler, D L and Winne, P H (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65, pp 245-81
7. Dedic, H and Rosenfield, S (2002) The impact of interactive Web-based materials on student conceptual understanding in differential calculus. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA
8. Dedic, H, Rosenfield, S, Cooper, M and Fuchs, M (2001) Do I really hafta? WebCAL: a look at the use of livemath software in Web-based materials that provide interactive engagement in a collaborative learning environment for differential calculus, Educational Research and Evaluation, 7 (2-3), pp 285-312
9. Doig, S M (2000) Developing an Understanding of the Role of Feedback in Education. Accessed 28 February 2002, from http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/conferences/A_conf/titles.html
10. Kulik, J A and Kulik, C L C (1988) Timing of feedback and verbal learning, Review of Educational Research, 58, pp 79-97
11. Latham, A S (1997) Learning through feedback, Educational Leadership, 54, pp 86-87
12. Lou, Y, Abrami, P C and d'Apollonia, S (2001) Small group and individual learning with technology: a meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 71, pp 449-521
13. Lou, Y, Abrami, P C, Spence, J C, Poulsen, C, Chambers, B and d'Apollonia, S (1996) Within-class grouping: a meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 66, pp 423-58
14. Papert, S (1980) Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas, Basic Books, New York
15. Pintrich, P R, Marx, R W and Boyle, R A (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change, Review of Educational Research, 63, pp 167-99
16. Rieber, L P, Tzeng, S, Tribble, K and Chu, G (1996) Feedback and elaboration within a computer-based simulation: a dual coding perspective, Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations, 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, IN
17. Rumelhart, D and Norman, D (1978) Accretion, tuning and restructuring: three modes of learning, in Semantic Factors in Cognition, eds J W Cotton and R Klatzky, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
18. Winne, P H (1989) Theories of instruction and of intelligence for designing artificially intelligent tutoring systems, Educational Psychologist, 24, pp 229-59