Frameless nonstereotactic image-guided surgery of supratentorial lesions: Introduction to a safe and inexpensive technique

Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part A: Central European Neurosurgery

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 365-370

  Callovini, Giorgio ^a   Sherkat, Shahram ^b   Callovini, Gemma ^a   Gazzeri, Roberto ^c  

^a SPIRITO SANTO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b SAN FILIPPO NERI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c SAN GIOVANNI ADDOLORATA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

cortical sulci; image guided surgery; MRIcro; neuronavigation; stereotaxy

Indexed keywords

ANTICONVULSIVE AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ANTICONVULSANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; BRAIN BLOOD VESSEL; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN EXTRACTION TOOL; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN SURGERY; CANCER SURGERY; CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CRANIOTOMY; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRAMELESS NONSTEREOTACTIC IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY; FRAMELESS STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NEURONAVIGATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL GYRUS; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SEIZURE; SKIN INCISION; SUPRATENTORIAL LESION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CRANIOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906790470     PISSN: 21936315     EISSN: 21936323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358607     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anil S. M., Kato Y., Hayakawa M., Yoshida K., Nagahisha S., Kanno T. Virtual 3-dimensional preoperative planning with the dextroscope for excision of a 4th ventricular ependymoma. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: 2007; 50 2 65 70 (Pubitemid 47305282)
2. Iseki H., Masutani Y., Iwahara M., et al. Volumegraph (overlaid three-dimensional image-guided navigation). Clinical application of augmented reality in neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg: 1997; 68 1-4 Pt 1 18 24 (Pubitemid 28312089)
3. Masutani Y., Dohi T., Yamane F., Iseki H., Takakura K. Augmented reality visualization system for intravascular neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg: 1998; 3 5 239 247 (Pubitemid 29180708)
4. Marescaux J., Rubino F., Arenas M., Mutter D., Soler L. Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. JAMA: 2004; 292 18 2214 2215 (Pubitemid 39473158)
5. Baltuch G. H., Grady M. S. Virtual reality technology in neurosurgery. US Neurological Disease: 2006; 52 54
6. Callovini G. M., Sherkat S., Rinaldi A., Santucci N., Gazzeri G. Stereotactic-guided microsurgical removal of lesions without cortical appearance planned by three-dimensional CT reconstruction: limits and advantages of the frame-based technique. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: 1998; 41 4 187 193 (Pubitemid 29039777)
7. Dwarakanath S., Suri A., Sharma B. S., Mahapatra A. K. Neuronavigation in a developing country: a pilot study of efficacy and limitations in intracranial surgery. Neurol India: 2007; 55 2 111 116 (Pubitemid 46918477)
8. Schiffbauer H. Neuronavigation in brain tumor surgery. Clinical beta-phase of the Oulu Neuronavigator System Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Medica. Available at: http://herkules.oulu.fi/issn03553221/
9. Stadie A. T., Reisch R., Kockro R. A., et al. Minimally invasive cerebral cavernoma surgery using keyhole approaches-solutions for technique-related limitations. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: 2009; 52 1 9 16
10. Esposito V., Paolini S., Morace R., et al. Intraoperative localization of subcortical brain lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien): 2008; 150 6 537 542; discussion 543
11. Roberts D. W., Hartov A., Kennedy F. E., Miga M. I., Paulsen K. D. Intraoperative brain shift and deformation: a quantitative analysis of cortical displacement in 28 cases. Neurosurgery: 1998; 43 4 749 758; discussion 758-760 (Pubitemid 28436309)
12. Zele T., Matos B., Knific J., Bajrović F. F., Prestor B. Use of 3D visualisation of medical images for planning and intraoperative localisation of superficial brain tumours: our experience. Br J Neurosurg: 2010; 24 5 555 560
13. Rorden C., Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol: 2000; 12 4 191 200 (Pubitemid 32843166)
14. Lovo E. E., Quintana J. C., Puebla M. C., et al. A novel, inexpensive method of image coregistration for applications in image-guided surgery using augmented reality. Neurosurgery: 2007; 60 4 02 366 371; discussion 371-372
15. Kikinis R., Gleason P. L., Moriarty T. M., et al. Computer-assisted interactive three-dimensional planning for neurosurgical procedures. Neurosurgery: 1996; 38 4 640 649; discussion 649-651
16. Roessler K., Ungersboeck K., Aichholzer M., et al. Image-guided neurosurgery comparing a pointer device system with a navigating microscope: a retrospective analysis of 208 cases. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: 1998; 41 2 53 57 (Pubitemid 28293442)
17. Sipos E. P., Tebo S. A., Zinreich S. J., Long D. M., Brem H. In vivo accuracy testing and clinical experience with the ISG Viewing Wand. Neurosurgery: 1996; 39 1 194 202, discussion 202-204
18. Dorward N. L., Alberti O., Velani B., et al. Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation. J Neurosurg: 1998; 88 4 656 662 (Pubitemid 28145208)
19. Spetzger U., Hubbe U., Struffert T., et al. Error analysis in cranial neuronavigation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: 2002; 45 1 6 10 (Pubitemid 34303448)
20. Willems P. W., Taphoorn M. J., Burger H., Berkelbach van der Sprenkel J. W., Tulleken C. A. Effectiveness of neuronavigation in resecting solitary intracerebral contrast-enhancing tumors: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg: 2006; 104 3 360 368 (Pubitemid 43326841)
21. Stadie A. T., Kockro R. A., Reisch R., et al. Virtual reality system for planning minimally invasive neurosurgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg: 2008; 108 2 382 394 (Pubitemid 351213308)
22. Aydin K., Cokluk C., Kuruoglu E., et al. Using the magnetic resonance three-dimensional volume rendering for tissues technique in the planning of craniotomy flaps with linear scalp incision. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: 2006; 49 4 189 193 (Pubitemid 44606696)
23. Esposito V., Paolini S., Morace R. Resection of a left insular cavernoma aided by a simple navigational tool. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus: 2006; 21 1 e16
24. Sánchez González F., Domitrovic L., Funes T., et al. Planeamiento neuroquirùrgico informàtico: resultados con su utilizacion. Rev Argent Neuroc: 2009; 23 9 14
25. Wick W., Stupp R., Beule A. C., et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. A novel tool to analyze MRI recurrence patterns in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol: 2008; 10 6 1019 1024
26. Kikuta K., Takagi Y., Fushimi Y., et al. Target bypass: a method for preoperative targeting of a recipient artery in superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery anastomoses. Neurosurgery: 2008; 62 6 03 1434 1441
27. Ward N. S., Brown M. M., Thompson A. J., Frackowiak R. S. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain: 2003; 126 Pt 11 2476 2496 (Pubitemid 37314437)
28. Park J. S., Chung M. S., Chi J. G., Park H. S., Shin D. S. Segmentation of cerebral gyri in the sectioned images by referring to volume model. J Korean Med Sci: 2010; 25 12 1710 1715
29. Maciunas R. J., Galloway R. L. Jr, Latimer J. W. The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. Neurosurgery: 1994; 35 4 682 694; discussion 694-695
30. Galloway R. L. Jr, Maciunas R. J., Latimer J. W. The accuracies of four stereotactic frame systems: an independent assessment. Biomed Instrum Technol: 1991; 25 6 457 460
31. Brommeland T., Hennig R. Mechanical accuracy of a new stereotactic guide. Acta Neurochir (Wien): 2000; 142 4 449 454 (Pubitemid 30209615)
32. Nakajima S., Atsumi H., Kikinis R., et al. Use of cortical surface vessel registration for image-guided neurosurgery. Neurosurgery: 1997; 40 6 1201 1208; discussion 1208-1210
33. Woerdeman P. A., Willems P. W., Noordmans H. J., Tulleken C. A., van der Sprenkel J. W. Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: a comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods. J Neurosurg: 2007; 106 6 1012 1016 (Pubitemid 46871115)
34. Lindner D., Trantakis C., Renner C., et al. Application of intraoperative 3D ultrasound during navigated tumor resection. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: 2006; 49 4 197 202 (Pubitemid 44606698)
35. Unsgaard G., Ommedal S., Muller T., Gronningsaeter A., Nagelhus Hernes T. A. Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: initial experience during brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery: 2002; 50 4 804 812; discussion 812 (Pubitemid 36322806)
36. Sosna J., Barth M. M., Kruskal J. B., Kane R. A. Intraoperative sonography for neurosurgery. J Ultrasound Med: 2005; 24 12 1671 1682 (Pubitemid 41780711)
37. Sæther C. A., Torsteinsen M., Torp S. H., Sundstrom S., Unsgård G., Solheim O. Did survival improve after the implementation of intraoperative neuronavigation and 3D ultrasound in glioblastoma surgery? A retrospective analysis of 192 primary operations. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg: 2012; 73 2 73 78