Minimally invasive cerebral cavernoma surgery using keyhole approaches - Solutions for technique-related limitations

Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 9-16

  Stadie, A T ^a   Reisch, R ^b   Kockro, R A ^a   Fischer, G ^a   Schwandt, E ^a   Boor, S ^a   Stoeter, P ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cavernoma; Neuronavigation; Surgery planning; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN SURGERY; CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEUROENDOSCOPY; NEURONAVIGATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TREATMENT PLANNING; VIRTUAL REALITY; ADULT; BRAIN HEMANGIOMA; BRAIN TUMOR; CASE REPORT; ENDOSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROSURGERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; ENDOSCOPY; HEMANGIOMA, CAVERNOUS, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONAVIGATION; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65449123907     PISSN: 09467211     EISSN: 14392291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103305     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Reisch R, Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (4 Suppl): 242 - 255; discussion 242-255
2. Perneczky A , Mueller-Forell W , Lindert E van et al. Keyhole concept in neurosurgery with endoscope-assisted microsurgery and case-studies. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme Verlag; 1999
3. Perneczky A , Reisch R. Keyhole Approaches in Neurosurgery Volume. 1: Concept and Surgical Technique. Wien, New York: Springer Verlag; 2008
4. Kockro RA , Serra L , Tsai YT et al. Planning of skull base surgery in the virtual workbench: clinical experiences. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 62: 187-188
5. Kockro RA, Serra L, Tseng-Tsai Y et al. Planning and simulation of neurosurgery in a virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 118 - 135; discussion 135-137
6. Serra L , Hern N , Guan CG et al. An interface for precise and comfortable 3D work with volumetric medical datasets. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 62: 328-334
7. Kockro R, Stadie A, Schwandt E et al. A collaborative virtual reality environment for neurosurgical planning and training. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (ONS Suppl): ONS379 - ONS391
8. Stadie A, Kockro R, Reisch R et al. Virtual reality system for planning minimally invasive neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 382-394
9. Grunert P, Charalampaki K, Kassem M et al. Frame-based and frameless stereotaxy in the localization of cavernous angiomas. Neurosurg Rev 2003; 26: 53-61
10. Boecher-Schwarz HG, Grunert P, Guenthner M et al. Stereotactically guided cavernous malformation surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1996; 39: 50-55
11. Bertalanff y H , Benes L , Miyazawa T et al. Cerebral cavernomas in the adult. Review of the literature and analysis of 72 surgically treated patients. Neurosurg Rev 2002; 25: 1 - 53; discussion 54-55
12. Tirakotai W, Sure U, Benes L et al. Image-guided transsylvian, transinsular approach for insular cavernous angiomas. Neurosurgery 2003; 53: 1299 - 1304; discussion 1304-1305
13. Winkler D, Lindner D, Strauss G et al. Surgery of cavernous malformations with and without navigational support - a comparative study. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2006; 49: 15-19
14. Winkler D, Lindner D, Trantakis C et al. Cavernous malformations - navigational supported surgery . Minim Invas Neurosurg 2004 ; 47 : 24-28
15. Cinalli G, Cappabianca P, Falco R de et al. Current state and future development of intracranial neuroendoscopic surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005; 2: 351-373
16. Gaab MR, Schroeder HW. Neuroendoscopic approach to intraventricular lesions. J Neurosurg 1998; 88: 496-505
17. Gaab MR, Schroeder HW. Neuroendoscopic approach to intraventricular lesions. Neurosurg Focus 1999; 6: e5
18. Bertalanff y H, Kuhn G, Scheremet R et al. Indications for surgery and prognosis in patients with cerebral cavernous angiomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1992; 32: 659-666
19. Del Curling O Jr, Kelly DL Jr, Elster AD et al. An analysis of the natural history of cavernous angiomas. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 702-708
20. Robinson JR, Awad IA, Little JR. Natural history of the cavernous angioma. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 709-714
21. Kobayashi S. Neurosurgery of Complex Vascular Lesions and Tumors Thieme Medical Publishers. Stuttgart, New York; 2005
22. Peters TM. Image-guidance for surgical procedures. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: R505-R540
23. Wurm G, Wies W, Schnizer M et al. Advanced surgical approach for selective amygdalohippocampectomy through neuronavigation. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 1377 - 1382 ; discussion 1382-1383
24. Zotta D, Rienzo A Di, Scogna A et al. Supratentorial cavernomas in eloquent brain areas: application of neuronavigation and functional MRI in operative planning. J Neurosurg Sci 2005; 49: 13-19
25. Paleologos TS, Wadley JP, Kitchen ND et al. Clinical utility and costeff ectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 40 - 47; discussion 47-48
26. Resch KD. Postmortem inspection for neurosurgery: a training model for endoscopic dissection technique. Neurosurg Rev 2002; 25 : 79-88
27. Teo C, Nakaji P. Neuro-oncologic applications of endoscopy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2004; 15 : 89-103
28. Beems T, Grotenhuis JA. Long-term complications and defi nition of failure of neuroendoscopic procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 2004; 20: 868-877
29. Teo C, Rahman S, Boop FA et al. Complications of endoscopic neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 1996; 12 : 248 - 253; discussion 253