Predicting physical activity energy expenditure in manual wheelchair users

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1849-1858

  Nightingale, Tom Edward ^a   Walhim, Jean Philippe ^a   Thompson, Dylan ^a   Bilzon, James L J ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Disability; Exercise; Physical Activity; Spinal Cord Injury

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; ARM; DEVICES; DISABLED PERSON; ENERGY METABOLISM; EXERCISE TEST; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARABRACHIAL NUCLEUS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; SPINAL CORD INJURY; VALIDATION STUDY; WHEELCHAIR; WRIST;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; ARM; DISABLED PERSONS; ENERGY METABOLISM; EXERCISE TEST; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARABRACHIAL NUCLEUS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; WHEELCHAIRS; WRIST;

EID: 84906767444     PISSN: 01959131     EISSN: 15300315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000291     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bassett DR, Rowlands A, Trost SG. Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl): S32-8.
2. Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Disorders of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in veterans with paraplegia or quadriplegia: a model of premature aging. Metab Clin Exp. 1994;43(6):749-56.
3. Bhattacharya A, McCutcheon EP, Shvartz E, Greenleaf JE. Body acceleration distribution and O2 uptake in humans during running and jumping. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980; 49(5):881-7.
4. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ. Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(4):561-70.
5. Brage S, Brage N, Wedderkopp N, Froberg K. Reliability and validity of the computer science and applications accelerometer in a mechanical setting. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2003;7(2):101-19.
6. Buchholz AC, Pencharz PB. Energy expenditure in chronic spinal cord injury. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004;7(6):635-9.
7. Chen KY, Bassett DR. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(11 Suppl):S490-500.
8. Chen KY, Janz KF, Zhu W, Brychta RJ. Redefining the roles of sensors in objective physical activity monitoring. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl):S13-23.
9. Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L, Evidence Analysis Working Group. Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(6):881-903.
10. Esliger DW, Rowlands AV, Hurst TL, Catt M, Murray P, Eston RG. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(6):1085-93.
11. Esliger DW, Tremblay MS. Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(12):2173-81.
12. Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. Cardiovascular complications after acute spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(5):E13.
13. Garshick E, Kelley A, Cohen SA, et al. A prospective assessment of mortality in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(7): 408-16.
14. Ginis KAM, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Latimer AE, et al. Leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of people with spinal cord injury part II: activity types, intensities, and durations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):729-33.
15. Hiremath SV, Ding D. Evaluation of activity monitors to estimate energy expenditure in manual wheelchair users. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2009 Sep 2-6: Minneapolis (MN); 2009. pp. 835-8.
16. Hiremath SV, Ding D. Evaluation of activity monitors in manual wheelchair users with paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(1):110-7.
17. Hiremath SV, Ding D. Regression equations for RT3 activity monitors to estimate energy expenditure in manual wheelchair users. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. 2011: Boston (MA).
18. Horner FE, Rayson MP, Bilzon JLJ, IDEFICS Consortium. Reliability and validity of the 3DNX accelerometer during mechanical and human treadmill exercise testing. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35: S88-97.
19. John D, Freedson P. ActiGraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44(1 Suppl):S86-9.
20. John D, Miller R, Kozey-Keadle S, Caldwell G, Freedson P. Biomechanical examination of the Fplateau phenomenon in ActiGraph vertical activity counts. Physiol Meas. 2012;33(2):219-30.
21. Kesaniemi YA, Danforth E, Jensen MD, Kopelman PG, Lefebvre P, Reeder BA. Dose-response issues concerning physical activity and health: an evidence-based symposium. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6 Suppl):S351-8.
22. Lamarra N, Whipp BJ, Ward SA, Wasserman K. Effect of interbreath fluctuations on characterizing exercise gas-exchange kinetics. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987;62(5):2003-12.
23. Lavis TD, Scelza WM, Bockenek WL. Cardiovascular health and fitness in persons with spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007;18(2):317-31.
24. Metcalf BS, Curnow JSH, Evans C, Voss LD, Wilkin TJ. Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The Early Bird Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(9):1533-7.
25. Plasqui G, Joosen A, Kester AD, Goris AHC, Westerterp K. Measuring free-living energy expenditure and physical activity with triaxial accelerometry. Obes Res. 2005;13(8):1363-9.
26. Powell SM, Jones DI, Rowlands AV. Technical variability of the RT3 accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(10):1773-8.
27. Ried-Larsen M, Brond JC, Brage S, et al. Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the ActiGraph activity monitor. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9:113.
28. Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by selfreport: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2 Suppl):S1-14.
29. Santos-Lozano A, Marin PJ, Torres-Luque G, Ruiz JR, Lucia A, Garatachea N. Technical variability of the GT3X accelerometer. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34(6):787-90.
30. Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(3):197-206.
31. Silva P, Mota J, Esliger D, Welk G. Technical reliability assessment of the ActiGraph GT1M accelerometer. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2010;14(2):79-91.
32. Staudenmayer J, Zhu W, Catellier DJ. Statistical considerations in the analysis of accelerometry-based activity monitor data. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2012;44(1 Suppl):S61-7.
33. Strath SJ, Brage S, Ekelund U. Integration of physiological and accelerometer data to improve physical activity assessment. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S563-71.
34. Sun M, Hill JO. A method for measuring mechanical work and work efficiency during human activities. J Biomech. 1993;26(3): 229-41.
35. Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Sports Med. 2001;31(2):91-100.
36. Volp ACP, Esteves de Oliveira FC, Duarte Moreira Alves R, Esteves EA, Bressan J. Energy expenditure: components and evaluation methods. Nutr Hosp. 2011;26(3):430-40.
37. Wang Y, Vrongistinos KD, Xu DL. The relationship between consistency of propulsive cycles and maximum angular velocity during wheelchair racing. J Appl Biomech. 2008;24(3):280-7.
38. Warms CA, Belza BL. Actigraphy as a measure of physical activity for wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Nurs Res. 2004; 53(2):136-43.
39. Washburn RA, Copay AG. Assessing physical activity during wheelchair pushing: validity of a portable accelerometer. Adapt Phys Act Q. 1999;16(3):290-9.
40. Weir JBD. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 1949;109(1-2):1-9.