Clinical and Radiographic Comparison between Platform-Shifted and Nonplatform-Shifted Implant: A One-Year Prospective Study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 129-137

  Glibert, Maarten ^a   Vervaeke, Stijn ^a   De Bruyn, Hugo ^a,b   Östman, Pär Olov ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone volume; Dental implants; Immediate loading; Implant design; Osseotite 2; Platform shifting

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PARTIAL DENTURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMEDIATE DENTAL IMPLANT LOADING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84906720245     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12269     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:63-74.
2. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Ten years later. Results from a prospective single-centre clinical study on 121 oxidized (TiUnite) Branemark implants in 46 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:852-860.
3. Vervaeke S, Collaert B, De Bruyn H. The effect of implant surface modifications on survival and bone loss of immediately loaded implants in the edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28:1352-1357.
4. De Bruyn HRS, Östman PO, Cosyn J. Immediate loading in partially and completely edentulous jaws: a review of the literature with clinical guidelines. Periodontol 2000 2013; 64:1-36.
5. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4, 641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6:142-146.
6. Schincaglia GP, Marzola R, Scapoli C, etal. Immediate loading of dental implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible: a randomized controlled split-mouth study-machined versus titanium oxide implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:35-46.
7. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Maghaireh H, etal. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (3):CD003878.
8. Strub JR, Jurdzik BA, Tuna T. Prognosis of immediately loaded implants and their restorations: a systematic literature review. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39:704-717.
9. Barewal RM, Stanford C, Weesner TC. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of three loading protocols on dental implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27:945-956.
10. Collaert B, Wijnen L, De Bruyn H. A 2-year prospective study on immediate loading with fluoride-modified implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:1111-1116.
11. Vervaeke S, Collaert B, De Bruyn H. Immediate loading of implants in the maxilla: survival and bone loss after at least 2 years in function. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28:216-221.
12. Sennerby L, Rasmusson L. Osseointegration surgery: host determinants and outcome criteria. In: Zarb QA, Lekholm U, Albrektsson T, Tenenbaum H, eds. Aging, osteoporosis, and dental implants. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 2002:55-66.
13. Marquezan M, Osorio A, Sant'Anna E, etal. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:767-774.
14. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:743-754.
15. Lang NP, Jepsen S. Implant surfaces and design (Working Group 4). Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20(Suppl 4):228-231.
16. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20(Suppl 4):172-184.
17. Koo KT, Lee EJ, Kim JY, etal. The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis. J Periodontol 2012; 83:1104-1109.
18. Stein AE, McGlmphy EA, Johnston WM, etal. Effects of implant design and surface roughness on crestal bone and soft tissue levels in the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:910-919.
19. Baixe S, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, etal. Microgap between zirconia abutments and titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:455-460.
20. Al-Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effect of the platform-switching technique on preservation of peri-implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27:138-145.
21. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, etal. Impact of platform switching on peri-implant bone remodeling around short implants in the posterior region, 1-year results from a split-mouth clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 1:70-80.
22. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26:9-17.
23. Vandeweghe S, De Bruyn H. A within-implant comparison to evaluate the concept of platform switching: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2012; 5:253-262.
24. Canullo L, Pellegrini G, Allievi C, etal. Soft tissues around long-term platform switching implant restorations: a histological human evaluation. Preliminary results. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38:86-94.
25. Dellavia C, Canullo L, Allievi C, etal. Soft tissue surrounding switched platform implants: an immunohistochemical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24:63-70.
26. Vigolo P, Givani A. Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:103-109.
27. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, etal. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:220-230.
28. Herrmann I, Kultje C, Holm S, etal. A study on variances in multivariate analyses of oral implant outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9:6-14.
29. Tolstunov L. Implant zones of the jaws: implant location and related success rate. J Oral Implantol 2007; 33:211-220.
30. World Medical Association. Revising the declaration of helsinki. Bull Med Ethics 2000; 2:9-11.
31. Lekholm U, Zarb G. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integration protheses. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1985:199-209.
32. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, etal. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19:77-83, discussion 84.
33. Vervaeke S, Dierens M, Besseler J, etal. The influence of initial soft tissue thickness on peri-implant bone remodeling. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 23:758-766.
34. Grandi T, Garuti G, Guazzi P, etal. Survival and success rates of immediately and early loaded implants: 12-month results from a multicentric randomized clinical study. J Oral Implantol 2012; 38:239-249.
35. Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, etal. A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 25:560-566.
36. Raes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Clinical, aesthetic, and patient-related outcome of immediately loaded single implants in the anterior maxilla: a prospective study in extraction sockets, healed ridges, and grafted sites. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15:819-835.
37. Dierens M, Collaert B, Deschepper E, etal. Patient-centered outcome of immediately loaded implants in the rehabilitation of fully edentulous jaws. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:1070-1077.
38. Albrektsson T, Buser D, Chen ST, etal. Statements from the Estepona consensus meeting on peri-implantitis, February 2-4, 2012. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:781-782.
39. Lang NP, Berglundh T. Periimplant diseases: where are we now? - Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38(Suppl 11):178-181.
40. Zetterqvist L, Feldman S, Rotter B, etal. A prospective, multicenter, randomized-controlled 5-year study of hybrid and fully etched implants for the incidence of peri-implantitis. J Periodontol 2010; 81:493-501.
41. Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2010; 81:1350-1366.
42. Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, etal. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5:119-128.
43. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25:113-119.
44. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000; 71:546-549.
45. Chu SJ, Tarnow DP. Managing esthetic challenges with anterior implants. Part 1: midfacial recession defects from etiology to resolution. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013; 34:26-31. Spec No 7.
46. Chang M, Wennstrom JL. Soft tissue topography and dimensions lateral to single implant-supported restorations. a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24:556-562.