Operative standardization in randomized controlled surgical trials. Meeting of the INSECT trial;Operative standardisierung bei randomisiert kontrollier-ten studien in der chirurgie: Studientreffen der INSECT-studie

Chirurg

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 267-272

  Knaebel, H P ^a   Kirschner, M ^b   Reidel, M ^a   Buchler M ^a   Seiler, C ^a,c  

^a Studienzentrum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie Heidelberg ^*  (Germany)

^b B Braun Melsungen AG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Evaluation; Investigator meeting; Standardisation; Surgery

Indexed keywords

POLYDIOXANONE; POLYGLACTIN;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERSONNEL; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; SUTURE; SUTURING METHOD; SWINE; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ANIMALS; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; HERNIA, ABDOMINAL; HUMANS; MODELS, ANIMAL; POLYDIOXANONE; POLYGLACTIN 910; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; STAFF DEVELOPMENT; SURGERY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; SWINE;

EID: 33645087129     PISSN: 00094722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-005-1149-0     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M et al. (2005) Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 330:88-92
2. Dixon E, Hameed M, Sutherland F, Cook DJ, Doig C (2005) Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal. Ann Surg 241:450-459
3. Fingerhut A, Borie F, Dziri C (2005) How to teach evidence-based surgery. World J Surg 29:592-595
4. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T (2000) The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 231:436-442
5. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T (2001) Current practice of abdominal fascial closure: a survey of Ontario general surgeons. Can J Surg 44:366-370
6. Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Bauer H, Buchler MW, Rothmund M, Seiler CM (2005) The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society-rationale and current status. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:171-177
7. Knaebel HP, Koch M, Sauerland S, Diener MK, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2005) Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures - design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-trial [ISRC-TN24023541]. BMC Surg 5:3-13
8. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70-71
9. Naylor CD (1995) Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet 345:840-842
10. Niggebrugge AH, Trimbos JB, Hermans J, Steup WH, Van De Velde CJ (1999) Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised study. Lancet 353:1563-1567
11. Rucinski J, Margolis M, Panagopoulos G, Wise L (2001) Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique. Am Surg 67:421-426
12. van't Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350-1356
13. Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S (1998) Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg 176:666-670