Effects of and preference for conditions of token earn versus token loss

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 537-548

  Donaldson, Jeanne M ^a   Deleon, Iser G ^b   Fisher, Alyssa B ^c   Kahng, Sungwoo ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

loss aversion; positive reinforcement; response cost; tokens

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REINFORCEMENT;

CHILD; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TOKEN ECONOMY;

EID: 84906670208     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: 19383703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.135     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Balsam, P. D., &, Bondy, A. S., (1983). The negative side effects of reward. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 283-296. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-283
2. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., &, Wolf, M. M., (1969). Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119-124. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119
3. Broughton, S. F., &, Lahey, B. B., (1978). Direct and collateral effects of positive reinforcement, response cost, and mixed contingencies for academic performance. Journal of School Psychology, 16, 126-136. doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(78)90051-1
4. Conyers, C., Miltenberger, R., Maki, A., Barenz, R., Jurgens, M., Sailer, A.,..., Kopp, B., (2004). A comparison of response cost and differential reinforcement of other behavior to reduce disruptive behavior in a preschool classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 411-415. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-411
5. Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., &, Maglieri, K. A., (2005). On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 51-65. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.6-04
6. Iwata, B. A., &, Bailey, J. S., (1974). Reward versus cost token systems: An analysis of the effects on students and teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 567-576. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-567
7. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., &, Thaler, R. H., (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206. doi: 10.1257/jep.5.1.193
8. Kahneman, D., &, Tversky, A., (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. doi: 10.2307/1914185
9. Kaufman, K. F., &, O'Leary, K. D., (1972). Reward, cost, and self-evaluation procedures for disruptive adolescents in a psychiatric hospital school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 293-309. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-293
10. Kazdin, A. E., (1982). The token economy: A decade later. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 431-445. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-431
11. Magoon, M. A., &, Critchfield, T. S., (2008). Concurrent schedules of positive and negative reinforcement: Differential-impact and differential-outcomes hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 1-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-1
12. Rasmussen, E. B., &, Newland, M. C., (2008). Asymmetry of reinforcement and punishment in human choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 157-167. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-157
13. Ruddle, H. V., Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., &, Foster, T. M., (1982). Performance of humans in concurrent avoidance/positive-reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 51-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-51
14. Tanol, G., Johnson, L., McComas, J., &, Cote, E., (2010). Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions of the Good Behavior Game with kindergarten students. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 337-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2010.06.001
15. Wright, R. A., &, McCurdy, B. L., (2012). Class-wide positive behavior support and group contingencies: Examining a positive variation of the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 173-180. doi: 10.1177/1098300711421008 Development Development