Visual analysis design to support research into movement and use of space in Tallinn: A case study

Information Visualization

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 213-231

  Zhang, Qiuju ^a   Slingsby, Aidan ^b   Dykes, Jason ^b   Wood, Jo ^b   Kraak, Menno Jan ^a   Blok, Connie A ^a   Ahas, Rein ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Geo context; Interactive visual analysis; Movement; Multiple coordinated views; User questions; User tasks

Indexed keywords

VISUALIZATION;

GEO CONTEXTS; INTERACTIVE VISUAL ANALYSIS; MOVEMENT; MULTIPLE COORDINATED VIEWS; USER QUESTIONS; USER TASKS;

LAND USE;

EID: 84906536951     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473871613480062     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Kährik A and Tammaru T. Population composition in new suburban settlements of the Tallinn Metropolitan Area. Urban Stud 2008; 45(5-6): 1055-1078.
2. Tammaru T, Leetmaa K, Silm S, et al. Temporal and spatial dynamics of the new residential areas around Tallinn. Eur Plan Stud 2009; 17(3): 423-439.
3. Mäe R, Antov D and Antso I. Urban sprawl: mobility potentials in suburban areas of Tallinn. In: Pacetti M, Passerini G, Brebbia CA, et al. (eds) The sustainable city VII: urban regeneration and sustainability. Southampton: WIT Press, 2012, pp. 967-977.
4. Ahas R, Aasa A, Silm S, et al. Mobile positioning in space-time behaviour studies: social positioning method experiments in Estonia. Cartogr Geogr Inform 2007; 34(4): 259-273.
5. Andrienko G, Andrienko N and Heurich M. An eventbased conceptual model for context-aware movement analysis. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 2011; 25(9): 1347-1370.
6. Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Dykes J, et al. Geovisualization of dynamics, movement and change: key issues and developing approaches in visualization research. Inform Vis 2008; 7(3-4): 173-180.
7. Keim D, Kohlhammer J, Ellis G, et al. Mastering the information age: solving problems with visual analytics. Goslar: Eurographics Association, 2010, p. 168.
8. Tory M and Moller T. Human factors in visualization research. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2004; 10(1): 72-84.
9. Ahas R, Aasa A, Silm S, et al. Daily rhythms of suburban commuters' movements in the Tallinn Metropolitan Area: case study with mobile positioning data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 2010; 18(1): 45-54.
10. Tammaru T. Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn Metropolitan Area. Environ Plann A 2005; 37(9): 1669-1687.
11. Ahas R, Laineste J, Aasa A, et al. The spatial accuracy of mobile positioning: some experiences with geographical studies in Estonia. In: Gartner G, Cartwright W and Peterson MP (eds) Location based services and telecartography. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, pp. 445-460.
12. Kang C, Gao S, Lin X, et al. Analyzing and geovisualizing individual human mobility patterns using mobile call records. In: 18th international conference on geoinformatics, Beijing, China, 18-20 June 2010, pp. 1-7. New York: IEEE.
13. Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Bak P, et al. A framework for using self-organising maps to analyse spatio-temporal patterns, exemplified by analysis of mobile phone usage. J Locat Based Serv 2010; 4(3): 200-221.
14. Slingsby A, Beecham R and Wood J. Visual analysis of social networks in space and time. In: The Nokia data challenge workshop (Pervasive 2012), Newcastle, 18-19 June 2012.
15. Eagle N and Pentland A. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Pers Ubiquit Comput 2006; 10(4): 255-268.
16. Dal Fiore F, Beinat E, Rietveld P, et al. Exploring the relationship between land use and mobile phone usage: analysis of a dataset for the Amsterdam metropolitan region. In: Workshop on pervasive urban applications (PURBA), San Francisco, CA, 12-15 June 2011.
17. Skupin A and Miller HJ. Nokia MDC atlas: an exploration of mobile phone users, land cover, time, and space. In: Nokia data challenge workshop (Pervasive 2012), Newcastle, 18-19 June 2012.
18. Di Lorenzo G and Calabrese F. Identifying human spatio-temporal activity patterns from mobile-phone traces. In: 14th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), The George Washington Univeristy, Washington, DC, USA, 5-7 October 2011, pp. 1069-1074. Washington: Omnipress.
19. MacEachren AM. How maps work: representation, visualization and design. New York: The Guilford Press, 1995, p. 513.
20. Wehrend S and Lewis C. A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. In: Proceedings of the 1st conference on visualization '90, San Francisco, CA, 23-26 October 1990, pp. 139-143. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
21. Knapp L. A task analysis approach to the visualization of geographic data. In: Nyerges TL, Mark DM, Laurini R et al. (eds) Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction for geographic information systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1995, pp. 355-371.
22. Bertin J. Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1983, p. 415.
23. Andrienko N and Andrienko G. Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data: a systematic approach. Berlin: Springer, 2006, p. 703.
24. Friendly M and Kwan E. Effect ordering for data displays. Comput Stat Data An 2003; 43(4): 509-539.
25. Slingsby A, Dykes J and Wood J. Configuring hierarchical layouts to address research questions. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2009; 15(6): 977-984.
26. Fabrikant SI. Building task-ontologies for geovisualization. In: ICA commission on visualization and virtual environments pre-conference workshop on geovisualization on the web. Beijing, China, 3-4 August 2001.
27. Tallinn Department of Planning. Tallinn city masterplan (Tallinna linna üldplaneering), http://www.tallinn. ee/est/ehitus/Tallinna-linna- uldplaneering (accessed 29 December 2012).
28. Brewer CA. Chapter 7: color use guidelines for mapping and visualization. In: MacEachren AM and Taylor MAP (eds) Visualization in modern cartography. Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier Science, 1994, pp. 123-147.
29. Koh LC, Slingsby A, Dykes J, et al. Developing and applying a user-centered model for the design and implementation of information visualization tools. In: 15th international conference on information visualisation (IV), London, United Kingdom, 13-15 July 2011, pp. 90-95. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
30. Slingsby A and Dykes J. Experiences in involving analysts in visualisation design. Beyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for visualization (BELIV). In: Visweek 2012, Seattle, WA, 14-15 October 2012.
31. Aigner W, Miksch S, Schumann H, et al. Visualization of time-oriented data. London, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 2011.
32. Lloyd D and Dykes J. Human-centered approaches in geovisualization design: investigating multiple methods through a long-term case study. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2011; 17(12): 2498-2507.
33. Roberts JC. State of the art: coordinated & multiple views in exploratory visualization. In: Fifth international conference on coordinated and multiple views in exploratory visualization (CMV '07), Washington, DC, 2 July 2007, pp. 61-71. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
34. Robertson G, Fernandez R, Fisher D, et al. Effectiveness of animation in trend visualization. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2008; 14(6): 1325-1332.
35. Morrison JL. A theoretical framework for cartographic generalization with the emphasis on the process of symbolization. Int Yearb Cartogr 1974; 1974(14): 115-127.
36. Ware C. Information visualization: perception for design. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: ElsevierMorgan Kaufmann, 2004, p. 486.
37. Slingsby A, Dykes J and Wood J. Exploring uncertainty in geodemographics with interactive graphics. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2011; 17(12): 2545-2554.
38. Becker RA and Cleveland WS. Brushing scatterplots. Technometrics 1987; 29(2): 127-142.
39. Yi JS, Ya Kang, Stasko JT, et al. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2007; 13(6): 1224-1231.
40. Shneiderman B. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualization. In: Proceedings of IEEE symposium on visual languages. Boulder, CO, 3-6 September 1996, pp. 336-343. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
41. Shneiderman B. Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2D space-filling approach. ACM T Graphics 1992; 11(1): 92-99.
42. Becker RA, Cleveland WS and Shyu M-J. The visual design and control of trellis display. J Comput Graph Stat 1996; 5(2): 123-155.
43. Friendly M. Mosaic displays for multi-way contingency tables. J Am Stat Assoc 1994; 89(425): 190-200.
44. Gleicher M, Albers D, Walker R, et al. Visual comparison for information visualization. Infor Vis 2011; 10(4): 289-309.
45. Dykes J, Wood J and Slingsby A. Rethinking map legends with visualization. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2010; 16(6): 890-899.
46. Fry B. Processing, http://processing.org/(accessed 29 August 2012).
47. Wood J, Slingsby A and Dykes J. giCentreUtils, http://gicentre.org/utils/ (accessed 29 August 2012).
48. Harvey AS. From activities to activity settings: behaviour in context. In: Ettema D and Timmermans H (eds) Activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier Science, 1997, pp. 209-228.
49. Hugo G. Population geography. Prog Hum Geog 2007; 31(1): 77-88.
50. Kwan M-P. Gender differences in space-time constraints. Area 2000; 32(2): 145-156.
51. Bromley RDF, Tallon AR and Thomas CJ. Disaggregating the space-time layers of city-centre activities and their users. Environ Plann A 2003; 35(10): 1831-1851.
52. Ahas R and Mark Ü. Location based services-new challenges for planning and public administration? Futures 2005; 37(6): 547-561.