Spatial analysis of land suitability, hot-tub cabins and forest tourism in Appalachian Ohio

Applied Geography

Volumn 54, Issue , 2014, Pages 139-148

  Van Berkel, Derek B ^a   Munroe, Darla K ^a   Gallemore, Caleb ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amenity growth; Multifunctionality; Postproductivism; Rare events logistic regression; Spatial quantitative analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; COMPETITIVENESS; ECOTOURISM; FOREST COVER; FORESTRY; LAND USE; PROTECTED AREA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY; AMENITY; COMMODITY PRICE; POLICY MAKING; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; REGIONAL ECONOMY; TOURISM ECONOMICS;

HOCKING COUNTY; OHIO; UNITED STATES; APPALACHIANS;

EID: 84906512965     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. ACGIS Federal and state lands polygon shapefiles 2007, Athens Conservancy GIS Center.
2. Aguiló E., Alegre J., Sard M. The persistence of the sun and sand tourism model. Tourism Management 2005, 26:219-231.
3. Alegre J., Garau J. The factor structure of tourist satisfaction at sun and sand destinations. Journal of Travel Research 2011, 50(1):78-86.
4. Alessa L., Kliskey A., Brown G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 85:27-39.
5. Bowe S.A., Marcouiller D.W. Alternative tourism-timber dependencies and the development of forested rural regions. Forest Policy and Economics 2007, 9(6):653-670.
6. Brown G. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism Research 2006, 8:101-113. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
7. Chomitz K.M., Gray D.A. Roads, land use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize. The World Bank Economic Review 1996, 10(3):487-512.
8. Christaller W. Some considerations of tourism location in Europe: the peripheral regions-under-developed countries-recreation areas. Papers in Regional Science 1964, 12:95-105.
9. Claver-Cortés E., Molina-Azorńn J.F., Pereira-Moliner J. Competitiveness in mass tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 2007, 34:727-745.
10. Cremer-Schulte D., Dissart J.-C. Evaluating rural development in French regional nature parks. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2013, 1-21. (ahead-of-print).
11. Darling E. The city in the country: wilderness gentrification and the rent gap. Environment and Planning A 2005, 37(6):1015-1032.
12. Duesberg S., O'Connor D., Dhubháin Á.N. To plant or not to plant-Irish farmers' goals and values with regard to afforestation. Land Use Policy 2013, 32:155-164.
13. Gartner W.C. Rural tourism development in the USA. International Journal of Tourism Research 2004, 6(3):151-164.
14. Gimmi U., Schmidt S.L., Hawbaker T.J., Alcántara C., Gafvert U., Radeloff V.C. Increasing development in the surroundings of US National Park Service holdings jeopardizes park effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92(1):229-239.
15. Hair J.F.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate data analysis 1998, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey Upper Saddle River.
16. HAO Hocking Auditors database 2011, Hocking County.
17. Heinze G. Acomparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data. Statistics in Medicine 2006, 25(24):4216-4226.
18. HHTA Hocking Hills website 2014, Vol. 2012. Accessed 23.07.12. http://www.explorehockinghills.com/.
19. Hockinghills.com Hockinghills.com website 2014, Vol. 2012. http://www.hocking-hills.com/.
20. Holmes J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 2006, 22(2):142-160.
21. Howley P. Landscape aesthetics: assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecological Economics 2011, 72(0):161-169.
22. Hunt L.M., Boxall P., Englin J., Haider W. Remote tourism and forest management: a spatial hedonic analysis. Ecological Economics 2005, 53(1):101-113.
23. Hunziker M. The spontaneous reafforestation in abandoned agricultural lands: perception and aesthetic assessment by locals and tourists. Landscape and Urban Planning 1995, 31:399-410.
24. Irwin E.G. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 2002, 78(4):465-480.
25. Jongeneel R.A., Polman N.B.P., Slangen L.H.G. Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional?. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:81-94.
26. Kaidou D., Moore W., Charles-Soverall W. Neighborhood features and the rental price of villas and cottages in Barbados. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 2012, (in press).
27. Kienast F., Bolliger J., Potschin M., de Groot R., Verburg P., Heller I., et al. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environmental Management 2009, 44:1099-1120.
28. Kienast F., Degenhardt B., Weilenmann B., Wäger Y., Buchecker M. GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 105(4):385-399.
29. King G., Zeng L. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis 2001, 9(2):137-163.
30. Kliskey A.D. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 52(1):33-43.
31. Kuminoff N.V., Parmeter C.F., Pope J.C. Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2010, 60(3):145-160.
32. Law J., McSweeney K. Looking under the canopy: rural smallholders and forest recovery in Appalachian Ohio. Geoforum 2013, 44(0):182-192.
33. Lovell S.T., DeSantis S.R., Nathan C.A., Olson M.B., Ernesto Mendez V., Kominami H.C., et al. Integrating agroecology and landscape multifunctionality in Vermont: an evolving framework to evaluate the design of agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems 2010, 103(5):327-341.
34. Marcouiller D.W., Clendenning G. The supply of natural amenities: moving from empirical anecdotes to a theoretical basis. Amenities and Rural Development: Theory, Methods and Public Policy 2005, 6-32.
35. Marcouiller D.W., Kim K.-K., Deller S.C. Natural amenities, tourism and income distribution. Annals of Tourism Research 2004, 31(4):1031-1050.
36. Marsden T. Rural futures: the consumption countryside and its regulation. Sociol Ruralis 1999, 39:501-526.
37. Mather A.S., Hill G., Nijnik M. Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization?. Journal of Rural Studies 2006, 22(4):441-455.
38. McGranahan D.A., Wojan T.R., Lambert D.M. The rural growth trifecta: outdoor amenities, creative class and entrepreneurial context. Journal of Economic Geography 2011, 11(3):529-557.
39. Parmeter C., Pope J. Quasi-experiments and hedonic property value methods 2009, Available at SSRN 1283705.
40. Plieninger T., Dijks S., Oteros-Rozas E., Bieling C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33(0):118-129.
41. Pontius R.G., Schneider L.C. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2001, 85(1):239-248.
42. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
43. Santana-Jiménez Y., Suárez-Vega R., Hernández J.M. Spatial and environmental characteristics of rural tourism lodging units. Anatolia 2011, 22(1):89-101.
44. Saxena G., Clark G., Oliver T., Ilbery B. Conceptualizing integrated rural tourism. Tourism Geographies 2007, 9(4):347-370.
45. Sherrouse B.C., Semmens D.J., Clement J.M. An application of social values for ecosystem services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indicators 2014, 36:68-79.
46. Smith M.D., Krannich R.S. "Culture clash" revisited: newcomer and longer-term residents' attitudes toward land use, development, and environmental issues in rural communities in the Rocky Mountain West*. Rural Sociology 2000, 65(3):396-421.
47. Soliva R., Bolliger J., Hunziker M. Differences in preferences towards potential future landscapes in the Swiss Alps. Landscape Research 2010, 35:671-696. Routledge.
48. Tomz M., King G., Zeng L. ReLogit: rare events logistic regression. Journal of Statistical Software 2003, 8(2).
49. Unbehaun W., Probstl U., Haider W. Trends in winter sport tourism: challenges for the future. Tourism Review 2008, 63:36-47.
50. Urquhart J., Courtney P., Slee B. Private woodland owners' perspectives on multifunctionality in English woodlands. Journal of Rural Studies 2012, 28(1):95-106.
51. ® shapefiles: Water 2012, United States Census Bureau.
52. USDA SSURGO database 2012, Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
53. USGS National land cover database 2011, LCI.
54. USGS National elevation dataset 2012.
55. USGS US roads shapefile 2012.
56. USGS US township shapefiles 2012.
57. Van Berkel D., Verburg P.H. Sensitising rural policy: assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe. Land Use Policy 2010, 28:447-459.
58. Van Berkel D.B., Carvalho-Ribeiro S.N., Verburg P.H., Lovett A. Identifying assets and constraints for rural development with qualitative scenarios: a case study of Castro Laboreiro, Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 102:127-141.
59. Van Berkel D.B., Verburg P.H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Indicators 2012, 27(5):641-658. 10.1007/s10980-012-9730-7.
60. Van Den Eeckhaut M., Vanwalleghem T., Poesen J., Govers G., Verstraeten G., Vandekerckhove L. Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorphology 2006, 76(3):392-410.
61. Van Huylenbroeck G., Vandermeulen V., Mettepenningen E., Verspecht A. Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 2007, 2007:1-43.
62. Walker A.C. Hocking River basin (upper portion) underground water resources. Fairfield County, ground water, Hocking County, Perry County 1958, O. W. P. I. Ohio Division of Water (Ed.).
63. Waltert F., Schläpfer F. Landscape amenities and local development: a review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies. Ecological Economics 2010, 70(2):141-152.
64. Wan R., Liu D., Munroe D.K., Cai S. Modelling potential hydrological impact of abandoned underground mines in the Monday Creek Watershed, Ohio. Hydrological Processes 2013, 27(25):3607-3616.
65. White P.J., Mulligan G.F. Hedonic estimates of lodging rates in the four corners region. The Professional Geographer 2002, 54(4):533-543.
66. Widmann R.H., Balser D., Barnett C., Butler B.J., Griffith D.M., Lister T.W., et al. Ohio forests, 2006 2009, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
67. Willemen L., Verburg P.H., Hein L., van Mensvoort M.E.F. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 88:34-43.
68. Wilson G. Multifunctional 'quality' and rural community resilience. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2010, 35:364-381.
69. Wilson G.A. The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: a human geography perspective. Geoforum 2009, 40:269-280.
70. Wilson S., Fesenmaier D.R., Fesenmaier J., van Es J.C. Factors for success in rural tourism development. Journal of Travel Research 2001, 40:132-138.