The tail shouldn't wag the dog: Why modeling dog-human interaction is not ideal for socially assistive robotics

Interaction Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 195-200

  Feil Seifer, David ^a  

^a Reno   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906352420     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.15.2.06fei     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Chapman, W.H., Iii., Albrecht, R.J., Kim, V.B., Young, J.A., & Chitwood, W.R., J.r. (2002). Computer-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy with the da vinci surgical robot. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 12(3), 155-159. DOI: 10.1089/10926420260188038 (Pubitemid 34747768)
2. Farago, T., Miklosi, A., Korcsok, B., Szaraz, J., & Gacsi, M. (2014). Social behaviours in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model for designing social robots. Interaction Studies, 15(2).
3. Feil-Seifer, D., & Matarić, M. (2005, July). Defining socially assistive robotics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (pp. 465-468). Chicago, Il. (Pubitemid 44017851)
4. Feil-Seifer, D.J., & Mataric, M.J. (2011, August). People-aware navigation for goal-oriented behavior involving a human partner. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Development and Learning. Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
5. Kiesler, S., & Goetz, J. (2002, April). Mental models and cooperation with robotic assistants. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 576-577). Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: ACM Press.
6. Libin, A., & Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2004). Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: Preliminary inquiry. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and other Dementias, 19(2), 111-116. DOI: 10.1177/153331750401900209 (Pubitemid 38495955)
7. Mutlu, B., & Forlizzi, J. (2008, March). Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 287-294). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ACM New York, NY, USA.
8. Mutlu, B., Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009, March). Footing in human-robot conversations: How robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. In Proceedings of Human-Robot Interaction. San Diego, CA. DOI: 10.1145/1349822.1349860
9. Stanton, C., Kahn, P., Severson, R., Ruckert, J., & Gill, B. (2008, March). Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 271-278). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. DOI: 10.1145/1349822. 1349858
10. Sung, J., Grinter, R.E., & Christensen, H.I. (2010). Domestic robot ecology. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 417-429. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-010-0065-8
11. Tapus, A., & Matarić, M.J. (2006, July). User personality matching with hands-off robot for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. In Proceedings, International Symposium on Experimental Robotics. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
12. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., & Tanie, K. (2002, October). Analysis of factors that bring mental effects to elderly people in robot assisted activity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (Vol. 2, pp. 1152-1157). Lausanne, Switzerland. (Pubitemid 35437964)