Why is a dog-behaviour-inspired social robot not a doggy-robot?

Interaction Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 224-232

  Faragó, Tamás ^a   Gácsi, Márta ^a   Korcsok, Beáta ^b   Miklósi, Ádám ^a,b  

^a MTA ELTE COMPARATIVE ETHOLOGY RESEARCH GROUP   (Hungary)

^b EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906351605     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.15.2.11far     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006). Biomimetics: Biologically inspired technologies. CRC Press.
2. Botvinick, M.M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 201-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008. 02.009
3. Bradshaw, J.W. S., Blackwell, E.J., & Casey, R.A. (2009). Dominance in domestic dogs-useful construct or bad habit? Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 4(3), 135-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2008.08. 004
4. Canas, J.M., & Matellan, V. (2007). From bio-inspired vs. psycho-inspired to etho-inspired robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 55(12), 841-850. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2007.07.010 (Pubitemid 350030399)
5. Dahl, T.S. (2014). Problems with using a human-dog interaction model for human-robot interaction? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issuse.
6. Faragó, T., Andics, A., Devecseri, V., Kis, A., Gácsi, M., & Miklósi, Á. (2014). Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations. Biology Letters, 10(1), 20130926. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0926
7. Faragó, T., Miklósi, Á., Korcsok, B., Száraz, J., & Gácsi, M. (2014). Social behaviours in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model of companion robot behaviour. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issuse.
8. Feil-Seifer, D.J. (2014). The tail shouldn't wag the dog: Why modeling dog-human interaction is not ideal for socially assistive Robotics. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.
9. Fischer, K. (2011). How people talk with robots?: Reduce user uncertainty. AI Magazine, 32(4), 31-38. DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v32i4.2377
10. Fischer, K. (2014). People do not interact with robots like with dogs. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.
11. Gácsi, M., Szakadát, S., & Miklósi, Á. (2013). Assistance dogs provide a useful behavioral model to enrich communicative skills of assistance robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(December), 1-11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00971
12. Grollman, D.H. (2014). Robots: Pets or people? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.
13. Hecht, J., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2012). Behavioral assessment and owner perceptions of behaviors associated with guilt in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 139(1-2), 134-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.015
14. Horowitz, C.A. (2009). Disambiguating the "guilty look": Salient prompts to a familiar dog behaviour. Behavioural Processes, 81(3), 447-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.014
15. Ishiguro, H., & Nishio, S. (2007). Building artificial humans to understand humans. Journal of Artificial Organs : The Official Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 10(3), 133-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10047-007- 0381-4 (Pubitemid 47389646)
16. Kerepesi, A., Jonsson, G.K., Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., Csányi, V., & Magnusson, M.S. (2005). Detection of temporal patterns in dog-human interaction. Behavioural Processes, 70(1), 69-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.04.006 (Pubitemid 40828305)
17. Koay, K.L., Lakatos, G., Syrdal, D.S., Gacsi, M., Bereczky, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Walters, M.L. (2013). Hey! There is someone at your door. A hearing robot using visual communication signals of hearing dogs to communicate intent. 2013 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALife) (pp. 90-97). Singapore: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ALIFE.2013.6602436
18. Lakatos, G., Gácsi, M., Tajti, F., Koay, K.L., Janiak, M., Faragó, T., & Miklósi, Á. (2013). Dog-inspired social behaviour in robots with different embodiments. 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).
19. Marshall-Pescini, S., Colombo, E., Passalacqua, C., Merola, I., & Prato-Previde, E. (2013). Gaze alternation in dogs and toddlers in an unsolvable task: Evidence of an audience effect. Animal Cognition. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0627-x
20. Marti, P. (2014). The temptation of mimicry. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.
21. Matellán, V., & Fernández, C. (2014). What downgrades a robot from pet to appliance? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.
22. Melson, G.F. (2014). Building better robots: Lessons from observing relationships between living beings. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.
23. Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2012). On the utilization of social animals as a model for social Robotics. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(March), 1-10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00075
24. Naderi, S., Miklósi, Á., Dóka, A., & Csányi, V. (2001). Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 74(1), 59-80. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00152-6 (Pubitemid 32722416)
25. Nicolescu, M.N. (2014). Commentary to "Social behaviors in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model for designing social robots." Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.
26. Novikova, J., Watts, L., & Bryson, J.J. (2014). The role of emotions in inter-action selection. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.
27. Partan, S.R. (1999). Communication goes multimodal. Science (New York, N.Y.), 283(5406), 1272-1273. DOI: 10.1126/science.283.5406.1272 (Pubitemid 29108983)
28. Pongrácz, P., Molnár, C., Miklósi, Á., & Csányi, V. (2005). Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119(2), 136-144. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.136 (Pubitemid 40977186)
29. Rose, R., Scheutz, M., & Schermerhorn, P. (2010). Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability. Interaction Studies, 11(2), 314-335. DOI: 10.1075/is.11.2.21ros
30. Wan, M., Bolger, N., & Champagne, F. a. (2012). Human perception of fear in dogs varies according to experience with dogs. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51775. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0051775