Erratum to Hemifield asymmetries differentiate VSTM for single- and multiple-feature objects (Atten Percept Psychophys, 10.3758/s13414-014-0689-0);Hemifield asymmetries differentiate VSTM for single- and multiple-feature objects

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1609-1619

  Sheremata, Summer ^a   Shomstein, Sarah ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention: Interactions with Memory; Memory: Visual working and short term memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REFERENCE VALUE; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TIME; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906344110     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0722-3     Document Type: Erratum

References (47)

1. Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106-111.
2. Ashbridge, E., Walsh, V., & Cowey, A. (1997). Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1121-1131.
3. Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F. G., & Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-11.
4. Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321, 851-854.
5. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Attention accesses multiple reference frames: Evidence from visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 83-101.
6. Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491-498.
7. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
8. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-185.
9. Emrich, S. M., Burianová, H., & Ferber, S. (2011). Transient perceptual neglect: Visual working memory load affects conscious object processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2968-2982.
10. Esterman, M. (2000). Preattentive and attentive visual search in individuals with hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychology, 14, 599-611.
11. Ferber, S., & Danckert, J. (2006). Lost in space-The fate of memory representations for non-neglected stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 44, 320-325.
12. Gamble, C. M., & Somers, D. C. (2012). An emergent hemifield asymmetry for visual short-term memory capacity. Journal of Vision, 12, 347.
13. Gozli, D. G., Wilson, K. E., & Ferber, S. (2013). The spatially asymmetric cost of memory load on visual perception: Transient stimulus-centered neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 580-591.
14. Heilman, K. M., & van Den Abell, T. (1979). Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation. Neuropsychologia, 17, 315-321.
15. Kamke, M. R., Vieth, H. E., Cottrell, D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2012). Parietal disruption alters audiovisual binding in the sound-induced flash illusion. NeuroImage, 62, 1334-1341.
16. Kinsbourne, M. (1977). Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Advances in Neurology, 18, 41-49.
17. Koivisto, M., & Silvanto, J. (2012). Visual feature binding: The critical time windows of V1/V2 and parietal activity. NeuroImage, 59, 1608-1614.
18. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
19. Luria, R., Sessa, P., Gotler, A., Jolicœur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (2010). Visual short-term memory capacity for simple and complex objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 496-512.
20. Luria, R., & Vogel, E. K. (2011). Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1632-1639.
21. Machizawa, M., Goh, C., Driver, J., & Husain, M. (2012). Hemispheric differences in visual working memory maintenance indexed by contralateral delay activity. Journal of Vision, 12, 180.
22. Malhotra, P., Jäger, H. R., Parton, A., Greenwood, R., Playford, E. D., Brown, M. M. Husain, M. M. (2005). Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect. Brain, 128, 424-435.
23. Mesulam, M. M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309-325.
24. Muggleton, N., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2008). The role of the angular gyrus in visual conjunction search investigated using signal detection analysis and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2198-2202.
25. Muggleton, N. G., Juan, C.-H., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2003). Human frontal eye fields and visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 3340-3343. doi: 10. 1152/jn. 01086. 2002.
26. Offen, S., Gardner, J. L., Schluppeck, D., & Heeger, D. J. (2010). Differential roles for frontal eye fields (FEFs) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in visual working memory and visual attention. Journal of Vision, 10, 28.
27. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
28. Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 10. doi: 10. 3389/neuro. 11. 010. 2008.
29. Phillips, W. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283-290.
30. Pisella, L., Berberovic, N., & Mattingley, J. B. (2004). Impaired working memory for location but not for colour or shape in visual neglect: A comparison of parietal and non-parietal lesions. Cortex, 40, 379-390.
31. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Morey, C. C., & Cowan, N. (2011). How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 324-330.
32. Santangelo, V., & Macaluso, E. (2011). The contribution of working memory to divided attention. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 158-175.
33. Sheremata, S. L., Bettencourt, K. C., & Somers, D. C. (2010). Hemispheric asymmetry in visuotopic posterior parietal cortex emerges with visual short-term memory load. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 12581-12588.
34. Shomstein, S., Lee, J., & Behrmann, M. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up attentional guidance: Investigating the role of the dorsal and ventral parietal cortices. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 197-208.
35. Szczepanski, S. M., & Kastner, S. (2013). Shifting attentional priorities: Control of spatial attention through hemispheric competition. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 5411-5421.
36. Szczepanski, S. M., Pinsk, M. A., Douglas, M. M., Kastner, S., & Saalmann, Y. B. (2013). Functional and structural architecture of the human dorsal frontoparietal attention network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110, 15806-15811. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1313903110.
37. Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Dell'Acqua, F., Forkel, S. J., Simmons, A., Vergani, F., Murphy, D. G. M., & Catani, M. (2011). A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1245-1246.
38. Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751-754.
39. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
40. Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751.
41. Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500-503.
42. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1436-1451.
43. Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1120-1135.
44. Wilson, K. E., Adamo, M., Barense, M. D., & Ferber, S. (2012). To bind or not to bind: Addressing the question of object representation in visual short-term memory. Journal of Vision, 12, 14.
45. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33-39.
46. Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2008). Selective storage and maintenance of an object's features in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 223-229.
47. Xu, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature, 440, 91-95.