Blood loss during posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 1479-1487

  Koerner, John D ^a   Patel, Anuradha ^b   Zhao, Caixia ^b   Schoenberg, Catherine ^b   Mishra, Avantika ^c   Vives, Michael J ^b   Sabharwal, Sanjeev ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; blood loss; instrumentation; osteotomy; Ponte; scoliosis; transfusion

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CASE STUDY; CHILD; COBB ANGLE; FEMALE; HEMATOCRIT; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSTEOTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL PATIENT; ALLOTRANSPLANTATION; BONE SCREW; DEVICES; METABOLISM; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCEDURES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCOLIOSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBINS; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906307658     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000439     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Fox HJ, Thomas CH, Thompson AG. Spinal instrumentation for Duchenne's muscular dystrophy: Experience of hypotensive anaesthesia to minimise blood loss. J Pediatr Orthop 1997; 17: 750-3.
2. Florentino-Pineda I, Blakemore LC, Thompson GH, et al. The effect of epsilon-aminocaproic acid on perioperative blood loss in patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion: a preliminary prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 1147-51.
3. McLeod LM, French B, Flynn JM, et al. Antifibrinolytic use and blood transfusions in pediatric scoliosis surgeries performed at US children's hospitals [published online ahead of print October 30, 2013]. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a22a54.
4. Verma K, Errico TJ, Vaz KM, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded single-site control study comparing blood loss prevention of tranexamic acid (TXA) to epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) for corrective spinal surgery. BMC Surg 2010; 10: 13.
5. Du Toit G, Relton JE, Gillespie R. Acute haemodilutional autotransfusion in the surgical management of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978; 60-B: 178-80.
6. Copley LA, Richards BS, Safavi FZ, et al. Hemodilution as a method to reduce transfusion requirements in adolescent spine fusion surgery . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 219-22; discussion 223-14.
7. Gordon ZL, Son-Hing JP, Poe-Kochert C, et al. Bipolar sealer device reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2013; 33: 700-6.
8. Hassan N, Halanski M, Wincek J, et al. Blood management in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: Review of a 2-year experience. Transfusion 2011; 51: 2133-41.
9. Carling MS, Jeppsson A, Wessberg P, et al. Preoperative fibrinogen plasma concentration is associated with perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements in scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 549-55.
10. Shander A, Hofmann A, Gombotz H, et al. Estimating the cost of blood: past, present, and future directions. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007; 21: 271-89.
11. Sullivan MT, Cotten R, Read EJ, et al. Blood collection and transfusion in the United States in 2001. Transfusion 2007; 47: 385-94.
12. Frere MC, Rapaille A, Bouillenne C, et al. Analysis of 516 reports of reactions after the transfusion of labile blood products. Transfus Clin Biol 2001; 8: 333-42.
13. Schwarzkopf R, Chung C, Park JJ, et al. Effects of perioperative blood product use on surgical site infection following thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 340-6.
14. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Lenke LG, et al. Non-neurologic complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 2427-32.
15. Edler A, Murray DJ, Forbes RB. Blood loss during posterior spinal fusion surgery in patients with neuromuscular disease: is there an increased risk? Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13: 818-22.
16. Halanski MA, Cassidy JA. Do multilevel Ponte osteotomies in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis surgery improve curve correction and restore thoracic kyphosis? J Spinal Disord Tech 2011.
17. Jain A, Njoku DB, Sponseller PD. Does patient diagnosis predict blood loss during posterior spinal fusion in children? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 1683-7.
18. Kannan S, Meert KL, Mooney JF, et al. Bleeding and coagulation changes during spinal fusion surgery: a comparison of neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2002; 3: 364-9.
19. Meert KL, Kannan S, Mooney JF. Predictors of red cell transfusion in children and adolescents undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 2137-42.
20. Ialenti MN, Lonner BS, Verma K, et al. Predicting operative blood loss during spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2013; 33: 372-6.
21. Yilmaz G, Borkhuu B, Dhawale AA, et al. Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid, and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2012; 32: 490-9.
22. Tsirikos AI, Subramanian AS. Posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does a bilateral or unilateral screw technique affect surgical outcome? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 1670-7.
23. Karatoprak O, Unay K, Tezer M, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Int Orthop 2008; 32: 523-8; discussion 529.
24. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 2040-8.
25. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 291-8.
26. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 2400-4.
27. Cheng I, Kim Y, Gupta MC, et al. Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws-which provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 2104-12.
28. Storer SK, Vitale MG, Hyman JE, et al. Correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using thoracic pedicle screw fixation versus hook constructs. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25: 415-9.
29. Liljenqvist U, Lepsien U, Hackenberg L, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 336-43.
30. Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB. Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks. Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22: 1369-79.
31. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A: 1169-81.
32. Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, et al. Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2147-50.
33. Sabharwal S, Apazidis A, Zhao C, et al. Comparison of intraoperative supine and postoperative standing radiographs after posterior instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 2011; 20: 389-96.
34. Geck MJ, Macagno A, Ponte A, et al. The Ponte procedure: posterior- only treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis using segmental posterior shortening and pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20: 586-93.
35. Johar RS, Smith RP. Assessing gravimetric estimation of intraoperative blood loss. J Gynecol Surg 1993; 9: 151-4.
36. Hopf CG, Eysel P. One-stage versus two-stage spinal fusion in neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 2000; 9: 234-43.
37. Yu X, Xiao H, Wang R, et al. Prediction of massive blood loss in scoliosis surgery from preoperative variables. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012.
38. Thompson ME, Kohring JM, et al. Predicting excessive hemorrhage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Spine J 2013.
39. Shapiro F, Sethna N. Blood loss in pediatric spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2004; 13 ( suppl 1 ): S6-17.
40. Zhang G, Zhang Y, Zhang X, et al. [Restoration of thoracic kyphosis with multilevel Ponte osteotomies in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis surgery]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2012; 26: 1197-201.
41. Sangiorgio SN, Borkowski SL, Bowen RE, et al. Quantification of increase in three-dimensional spine flexibility following sequential Ponte osteotomies in a cadaveric model. Spine Deformity 2013; 1: 171-8.
42. Shah SA, Dhawale AA, Oda JE, et al. Ponte osteotomies with pedicle screw instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deformity 2013; 1: 196-204.
43. Pizones J, Izquierdo E, Sanchez-Mariscal F, et al. Does wide posterior multiple level release improve the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves? J Spinal Disord Tech 2010; 23: e24-30.