Impact of the Farakka Dam on thresholds of the hydrologic: Flow regime in the Lower Ganges River Basin (Bangladesh)

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2501-2518

  Gain, Animesh K ^a   Giupponi, Carlo ^a  

^a CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Farakka dam; Ganges; Range of variability (RVA); River flow; Threshold

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; FLOOD CONTROL; STREAM FLOW; WATERSHEDS;

ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES; GANGES; HYDROLOGIC ALTERATIONS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; NATURAL RANGE OF VARIATION; RANGE OF VARIABILITY (RVA); RIVER FLOW; THRESHOLD;

DAMS;

DAM CONSTRUCTION; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; HYDROLOGICAL REGIME; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; POLICY MAKING; RIVER FLOW; SALINITY; THRESHOLD; WATER PLANNING;

BANGLADESH; FARAKKA BARRAGE; GANGES BASIN; INDIA; WEST BENGAL;

EID: 84906250451     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w6082501     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Gallopín, G.C. Linking between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2006, 16, 293-303.
2. Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009, 325, 419-422.
3. Gleick, P.H. Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 2003, 302, 1524-1528.
4. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and Human Wellbeing: Current State and Trends; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
5. Vörösmarty, C.J.; Mclntyre, P.B.; Gessner, M.O.; Dudgeon, D.; Prusevich, A.; Green, P.; Glidden, S.; Bunn, S.E.; Sullivan, C.A.; Liermann, C.R.; et al. Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Nature 2010, 467, 555-561.
6. Poff, N.L.; Matthews, J.H. Environmental flows in the Anthropocene: Past progress and future prospects. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5, 667-675.
7. Sanz, D.B.; García del Jalón, D.; Gutiérrez Teira, B.; Vizcaίno Martίnez, P. Basin influence on natural variability of rivers in semi-arid environments. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2005, 3, 247-259.
8. Gain, A.K.; Apel, H.; Renaud, F.G.; Giupponi, C. Thresholds of hydrologic flow regime of a river and investigation of climate change impact-The case of lower Brahmaputra river Basin. Clim. Chang. 2013, 120, 463-475.
9. Poff, N.L.; Allan, J.D.; Bain, M.B.; Karr, J.R.; Prestegaard, K.L.; Brian, D.; Sparks, R.E.; Stromberg, J.C.; Richter, B.D. The natural flow regime-A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 1997, 47, 769-784.
10. Olden, J.D.; Poff, N.L.; Bestgen, K.R. Life-history strategies predict fish invasions and extirpations in the Colorado River Basin. Ecol. Monogr. 2006, 76, 25-40.11.
11. Poff, N.L.; Richter, B.R.; Arthington, A.H.; Bunn, S.E.; Naiman, R.J.; Kendy, E.; Acreman, M.; Apse, C.; Bledsoe, B.P.; Freeman, M.C.; et al. The ecological limits of hydrological alteration (ELOHA): A new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55, 147-170.
12. Leopold, L.B.; Wolman, M.G.; Miller, J.P. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology; W.H. Freeman and Sons: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1964.
13. Tabacchi, E.; Correll, D.L.; Hauer, R.; Pinay, G.; Planty-Tabacchi, A.M. Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape. Freshw. Biol. 1998, 40, 497-516.
14. Cuny, F.C. Living with floods: Alternatives for riverine flood mitigation. Land Use Policy 1991, 8, 331-342.
15. Tockner, K.; Stanford, J.A. Riverine floodplains: Present state and future trends. Environ. Conserv. 2002, 29, 308-330.
16. Smakhtin, V.U.; Shilpakar, R.L.; Hughes, D.A. Hydrology-based assessment of environmental flows: An example from Nepal. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2006, 51, 207-222.
17. Wharton, C.H.; Lambou, V.W.; Newsome, J.; Winger, P.V.; Gaddy, L.L.; Mancke, R. The fauna of bottomland hardwoods in the southeastern United States. In Wetlands of Bottom-Land Hardwood Forests; Clark, J.R., Benforado, J., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 87-160.
18. Gain, A.K.; Giupponi, C.G.; Renaud, F.G. Climate change adaptation and vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in developing countries: A generalized framework and a feasibility study in Bangladesh. Water 2012, 4, 345-366.
19. Kundzewicz, Z.W.; Mata, L.J.; Arnell, N.W.; Döll, P.; Kabat, P.; Jiménez, B.; Miller, K.A.; Oki, T.; Sen, Z.; Shiklomanov, I.A. Freshwater resources and their management. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 173-210.
20. Bates, B.C.; Kundzewicz, Z.W.; Wu, S.; Palutikof, J.P. Climate Change and Water; Technical Paper for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC Secretariat: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
21. Stocker, T.F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.-K.; Tignor, M.; Allen, S.K.; Boschung, J.; Nauels, A.; Xia, Y.; Bex, V.; Midgley, P.M. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013.
22. IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate Change 2014: Impact, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014.
23. Ghanbarpour, M.R.; Zolfaghari, S.; Geiss, C.; Darvari, Z. Investigation of river flow alterations using environmental flow assessment and hydrologic indices: Tajan River Watershed, Iran. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2013, 11, 311-321.
24. WCD (World Commission on Dams). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision Making; Earthscan: London, UK, 2000.
25. Nilsson, C.; Reidy, C.A.; Dynesius, M.; Revenga, C. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science 2005, 308, 405-408.
26. Poff, N.L.; Hart, D.D. How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. BioScience 2002, 52, 659-668.
27. Bunn, S.E.; Arthington, A.H. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ. Manag. 2002, 30, 492-507.
28. Richter, B.D.; Baumgartner, J.V.; Powell, J.; Braun, D.P. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 10, 1163-1174.
29. Richter, B.D.; Baumgartner, J.V.; Wigington, R.; Braun, D.P. How much water does a river need? Freshw. Biol. 1997, 37, 231-249.
30. Richter, B.D.; Davis, M.M.; Apse, C.; Konrad, C. A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Res. Appl. 2012, 28, 1312-1321.
31. Pegg, M.A.; Pierce, C.L.; Roy, A. Hydrological alteration along the Missouri River basin: A time series approach. Aquat. Sci. 2003, 65, 63-72.
32. Magilligan, F.J.; Nislow, K.H. Changes in hydrologic regime by dams. Geomorphology 2005, 71, 61-68.
33. Jiang, L.; Ban, X.; Wang, X.; Cai, X. Assessment of hydrologic alterations caused by the Three Gorges Dam in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, China. Water 2014, 6, 1419-1434.
34. Matthews, R.; Richter, B.D. Application of the indicators of hydrologic alternation software in environmental flow setting. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43, 1400-1413.
35. Pyron, M.; Neumann, L. Hydrologic alterations in the Wabash River Watershed, USA. River Res. Appl. 2008, 24, 1175-1184.
36. Zhang, Y.; Arthington, A.H.; Bunn, S.E.; Mackay, S.; Xia, J.; Kennard, M. Classification of flow regimes for environmental flow assessment in regulated rivers: The Huai River Basin, China. River Res. Appl. 2012, 28, 989-1005.
37. Smakhtin, V.U. Low flow hydrology: A review. J. Hydrol. 2001, 240, 147-186.
38. Gain, A.K.; Immerzeel, W.W.; Sperna Weiland, F.C.; Bierkens, M.F.P. Impact of climate change on the stream flow of the lower Brahmaputra: Trends in high and low flows based on discharge-weighted ensemble modelling. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15, 1537-1545.
39. Mirza, M.M.Q. Diversion of the Ganges Water at Farakka and its effects on salinity in Bangladesh. Environ. Manag. 1998, 22, 711-722.
40. Rouillard, J.J.; Benson, D.; Gain, A.K. Evaluating IWRM implementation success: Are water policies in Bangladesh enhancing adaptive capacity to climate impacts. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2014, 30, 515-527.
41. Chowdhury, M.R.; Ward, N. Hydro-meteorological variability in the greater Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Basins. Int. J. Climatol. 2004, 24, 1495-1508.
42. Jain, S.K.; Kumar, V. Trend analysis of rainfall and temperature data for India. Curr. Sci. India 2012, 102, 37-49.
43. Gain, A.K.; Hoque, M.M. Flood risk assessment and its application in the eastern part of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2013, 6, 219-228.
44. Gain, A.K.; Wada, Y. Assessment of future water scarcity at different spatial and temporal scales of the Brahmaputra River Basin. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 28, 999-1012.45.
45. Abbas, N.; Subramanian, V. Erosion and sediment transport in the Ganges River basin, India. J. Hydrol. 1984, 69, 173-182.
46. Abbas, B.M. The Ganges Water Dispute; University Press Limited: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1984.
47. Mirza, M.M.Q. Hydrological changes in the Ganges system in Bangladesh in the post-Farakka period. Hydrolog. Sci. J. 1997, 42, 613-631.
48. Governtment of the People's Republic of Bangladesh GoB. Ganges Water Sharing Treaty; Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Dhaka: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1996.
49. Milhous, R.T. Selected hydrological tools for in-stream flow analysis. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual American Geophysical Union (AGU) Hydrologic Days, Colorado State University, CO, USA, 24-26 March 2014; pp. 32-43.
50. Kumar, V.; Jain, S.K. Trend in rainfall amount and number of rainy days in river basins of India (1951-2004). Hydrol. Res. 2011, 42, 290-306.
51. Gain, A.K.; Uddin, M.N.; Sana, P. Impact of river salinity on fish diversity in the south-west coastal region of Bangladesh. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2008, 34, 49-54.
52. Poff, N.L.; Ward, J.V. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: A regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can. J. Aquat. Sci. 1989, 46, 1805-1818.
53. Walker, K.F.; Sheldon, F.; Puckridge, J.T. A perspective on dryland river ecosystem. Regul. River 1995, 11, 85-104.
54. Olden, J.D.; Poff, N.L. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Res. Appl. 2003, 19, 101-121.
55. Monk, W.A.; Wood, P.J.; Hannah, D.M.; Wilson, D.A. Selection of river flow indices for the assessment of hydroecological change. River Res. Appl. 2007, 23, 113-122.
56. Poff, N.L.; Zimmerman, J.K.H. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: A literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55, 194-205.
57. Swain, A. Displacing the conflict: Environmental destruction in Bangladesh and ethnic conflict in India. J. Peace Res. 1996, 33, 189-204.
58. Mallick, B.; Vogt, J. Population displacement after cyclone and its consequences: Empirical evidence from coastal Bangladesh. Nat. Hazards 2014, 73, 191-212.
59. Akter, S.; Mallick, B. The poverty-vulnerability-resilience nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 96, 114-124.
60. Adel, M.M. Effect on water resources from upstream water diversion in the Ganges basin. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30, 356-68.
61. Hossain, M.A.; Haque, M.A. Fish species composition in the river Padma near Rajshahi. J. Life Earth Sci. 2005, 1, 35-42.
62. Gain, A.K.; Aryal, K.P.; Sana, P.; Uddin, M.N. Effect of river salinity on crop diversity: A case study of south west coastal region of Bangladesh. Nepal Agric. Res. J. 2007, 8, 35-43.
63. Mirza, M.M.Q. The Ganges Water Diversion: Environmental Effects and Implications; Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004.
64. Meijer, K.S.; van Beek, E. A framework for the quantification of the importance of environmental flows for human well-being. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2011, 24, 1252-1269.65.
65. Hossain, M.S.; Hein, L.; Rip, F.I.; Dearing, J.A. Integrating ecosystem services and climate change responses in coastal wetlands development plans for Bangladesh. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2013, doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9489-4.
66. Sultana, F. Engendering a catastrophe: A gendered analysis of India's river linking project. In Regional Cooperation on Transboundary Rivers: Impact of the Indian River-linking Project; Ahmed, M.F., Ahmad, Q.K., Khalequzzaman, M., Eds.; BAPA Press: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2004; pp. 288-305.
67. Opstal, E.V. O Mother, O Ganges! Water Reduction and Social Changes in Rural Southwest Bangladesh; Working Paper No. 3; Conflict Research Group, Ghent University: Ghent, Belgium, 2006.
68. Mallick, B.; Rahaman, K.R.; Vogt, J. Social vulnerability analysis for sustainable disaster mitigation planning in coastal Bangladesh. Disaster Prev. Manag. 2011, 20, 220-237.
69. Zaman, M. Economic opportunities from Polders in Bangladesh. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 1983, 1, 197-204.
70. Kamruzzaman, M.; Beecham, S.; Zuppi, G.M. A model for water sharing in the Ganges River Basin. Water Environ. J. 2012, 26, 308-318.
71. Rahaman, M.M. Integrated Ganges Basin management: Conflicts and hope for regional development. Water Policy 2009, 11, 168-190.
72. Rahaman, M.M. Principles of transboundary water resources management and Ganges Treaties: An analysis. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2009, 25, 159-173.
73. Gain, A.K.; Rouillard, J.J.; Benson, D. Can integrated water resources management increase adaptive capacity to climate change adaptation? A critical review. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2013, 5, 11-20.
74. Huq, N.; Hugé, J. "Greening" integrated water resources management policies for tackling climate change impacts: A call for sustainable development. In Climate Change and the Sustainable Use of Water Resources; Filho, W.L., Ed.;Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012; pp. 173-183.
75. Giupponi, C.; Sgobbi, A. Decision support systems for water resources management in developing countries: Learning from experiences in Africa. Water 2013, 5, 798-818.
76. Gain, A.K.; Schwab, M. An assessment of water governance trends: The case of Bangladesh. Water Policy 2012, 14, 821-840.
77. Sen, H.S. The drying up of River Ganga: An issue of common concern to both India and Bangladesh. Curr. Sci. India 2010, 99, 725-727.
78. Gain, A.K.; Giupponi, C. A dynamic assessment of water scarcity risk in the Lower Brahmaputra River Basin: An integrated approach. Ecol. Indic. 2014, in press.