MUD and self efficacy;MUD et l’efŽ cacité personnelle;MUD und Selbstvertrauen

Educational Media International

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 177-183

  Lee, Kwan Min ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906129930     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980050184745     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84: 191–215.
2. Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundation of nought and Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bandura, A. 1997. Sty-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
4. Bandura, A, Barbaranelli, C, Caprara, GV, and Pastorelli, C. 1996. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67: 1206–1222.
5. Bartle, R (1990) Interactive Multi-User Computer Games, MUSE Ltd, Essex, available online http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/imucgO.htm (http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/imucgO.htm)
6. Beniger, J. 1986. The Control Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Bruckman, A (1994) Gender Swapping on the Internet, available online http://mediajnit.edu/pub/asb/papers/gender-swapping.txt (http://mediajnit.edu/pub/asb/papers/gender-swapping.txt)
8. Campbell, A, Converse, PE, Miller, SE, and Stokes, DE. 1960. The American Voter, New York: Wiley.
9. Carlstrom, E (1992). Better Living Through Language: The Communicative Implications QfA Text-Only Virtual Environment, available online http://www.oise.on.ca/jnolan/muds/about_muds/communicative
10. Cherny, L. 1995. The Modal Complexity of Speech Events in a Social MUD. Electronic Journal of Communication, 5: 4
11. Clodius, J (1994) Ethnographic fieldwork on the Internet, Anthropology Newsletter, 35, 9, available online http://dragonmud.org/people/jen/afa.html
12. Clodius, J (1995) Computer-mediated interactions: human factors, paper presented at MUDhop: Learning Spaces, San Diego, CA, September, available online http://dragonmud.org/people/jen/keynote.html (http://dragonmud.org/people/jen/keynote.html)
13. Clodius, J (1997) Creating a community of interest: self and other on DrangonMud, paper presented at the Combined Conference on MUD, Wyoming, January, available online http://dragonmud.org/people/jen/MUDhopiii.html (http://dragonmud.org/people/jen/MUDhopiii.html)
14. Curtis, P (1992) Mudding: social phenomena in text-based virtual realities, Intertrek, 3,3, 26–34. available online http://www.oise.onca/∼jnolan/muds/ ab out_muds/pavel.html (http://www.oise.onca/∼jnolan/muds/ ab out_muds/pavel.html)
15. Curtis, P and Nichols, DA (1993) MUDs Grow Up: Social Virtual Reality in the Real World, available online http://www.oise.onca/∼jnolan/muds/ ab out_muds/mudsgrowup (http://www.oise.onca/∼jnolan/muds/ ab out_muds/mudsgrowup)
16. Finholt, T, and Sproull, L. 1990. Electronic groups at work. Organizational Science, 1: 41–64.
17. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, New York: Harper and Row.
18. Harrison, A, and Rainer, K. 1992. An examination of the factor structures and concurrent validities for the computer attitude scale, the computer anxiety rating scale, the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 52: 735–745.
19. Harrison, AW, Rainer, R, Jr, KeIIy, Hochwarter, WA, and Thompson, KR. 1997. Testing the self-efficacyperformance linkage of social-cognitive theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137: 79–87.
20. Hughes, CE and MoshelL, JM (1995) Shared virtual worlds for education: the explorenet experiment, to appear in ACM Multimedia Systems, available online http://www.cs.ucf.edu/ExploreNet/paper/VA.Experimentl 195.html (http://www.cs.ucf.edu/ExploreNet/paper/VA.Experimentl 195.html)
21. Innis, H., 1950. Empire and Communication, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. Innis, H. 1951. The Bias of Communication, Tronto: University of Tronto Press.
23. Lent, R. 1997. Discriminant and predictive validity of academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy, and mathematics-specific self-efficacy. oumal of Counselling Psychology, 44: 307–315.
24. Lucas, J. 1997. Development of a career task self-efficacy scale: The Kuder Task self-efficacy scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50: 432–459.
25. Marsh, H. 1997. Item-specific efficacy judgements in mathematical problem solving: The downside of standing too close to trees in a forest. Contemporary Educational Psycholology, 22: 363–377.
26. McLuhan, M. 1964a. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McG raw Hill.
27. McLuhan, M. 1964b. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man, New York: Mentor.
28. Murphy, CA, Coover, D, and Owen, SV. 1989. Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 49: 893–899.
29. Newhagen, J. 1994. Media use and political efficacy: the suburbanization of race and class. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45: 386–394.
30. Parks, M, and Floyd, K. 1996. Making friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46: 80–97.
31. Parks M. and Roberts, L. (1997) Making MOOsic: The Development of personal Relationships On-line and Comparison to their Off-line Counterparts. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Western Speech Communication Association, Monterey, California, February, available online http://psych.curtin.edu.au/people/robertsl/moosic.htm (http://psych.curtin.edu.au/people/robertsl/moosic.htm)
32. Rheingold, H. 1993. “ The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier ”. In Addison-Westey, MA: Reading.
33. Rice, RE, and Love, G. 1987. Electronic emotion: socio-emotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14: 85–108.
34. Rosenberg, M (1992) Virtual Reality: Reflections of Life, Dreams, and Technology, available online http://ftp.lambda.moo.mud.org/pub/MOO/papers/ethography.txt
35. Schwarzer, R. 1993. Measurement of perceived self-efficacy. Psychometric scales for cross-cultural research, Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
36. Sempsey, J (1997) Psyber psychology: a literature review pertaining to the psycho/social aspects of multi-user dimensions in Cyberspace, Journal of MUD Research, 2, 1, available online http://journal.tinymush.org/jomr/v2n1/sempsey.html (http://journal.tinymush.org/jomr/v2n1/sempsey.html)
37. Sherer, M, and Adams, CH. 1983. Construct validation of the self-efficacy scale. Psychological Report, 53: 899–902.
38. Sherer, M, Maddux, J, Mercandate, B, Prentice-Dunn, S, Jacobs, B, and Rodger, R. 1982. The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51: 663–671.
39. Speier, C, and Frese, M. 1997. Generalized self-efficacy as a mediator and moderator between control and complexity at work and personal initiative: a longitudinal field study in East Germany. Human Performance, 10: 171–192.
40. Stanley, KD, and Murphy, MR. 1997. A comparison of general self-efficacy with self-esteem, Genetic, Social, & General. Psychology Monographs, 123: 81–99.
41. Tipton, RM, and Worthington, EL. 1984. The measurement of generalized self-efficacy: a study of construct validity. Journal of ‘Personal Assessment, 48: 545–548.
42. Torkzadeh, G, and Koufteros, X. 1994. Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54: 813–821.
43. Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet, New York: Simon and Schuster.
44. Young, J (1994) Textuality in Cyberspace: MUD and Written Experience, available online http://eserver.org/cyber/young2.txt (http://eserver.org/cyber/young2.txt)