Learning to teach: A critical approach to field experiences: Second edition

Learning to Teach: A Critical Approach to Field Experiences: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-162

  Adams, Natalie G ^a   Shea, Christine Mary ^b   Liston, Delores D ^c   Deever, Bryan ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906116192     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410617323     Document Type: Book

References (33)

1. Britzman, D. (1986). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 454.
2. Equal Access Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 4071-74 (1984).
3. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
4. Zelman v. Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002).
5. Berlak, A. (1999). Teaching and testimony: Witnessing and bearing witness to racisms in culturally diverse classrooms. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 99-127.
6. Estola, E. (2003). Hope as work-Student teachers constructing their narrative identities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 181-203.
7. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Independent School, 49(2), 31-36.
9. Romo, H., &Falbo, T. (1996). Latino high school graduation:Defying the odds. Austin: TheUniversity of Texas Press.
10. Atkins, M., McKay, M., Frazier, S., Jakoboson, L., Arvanitis, P., Cunningham, T., Brown, C., & Lambrecht, L. (2002). Suspensions and detentions in an urban, low-income school: Punishment or reward?. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 361-371.
11. Jackson, G. (1994). Promoting civility on the academic network: Crime and punishment, or the Golden Rule?. Educational Record, 75, 29-39.
12. McCarthy, J. D., & Hoge, D. S. (1987). The social construction of school punishment: Racial disadvantage out of universalistic process. Social Forces, 65, 1101-1120.
13. Rothsein, S. (1984). The power to punish: A social inquiry into coercion and control in urban schools. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
14. Campbell, W. (2000). Techniques for dealing with student harassment at the high school level. American Secondary Education, 29(1), 34-37.
15. American Association of UniversityWomen. (1993). Hostile hallways: The AAUW survey on sexual harassment in America's schools. Washington, DC:American Association of University Women and National Education Association.
16. Grube, B., & Lens, V. (2003). Student-to-student harassment:The impact of Davis v. Monroe. Children & Schools, 25, 173-185.
17. American Association of University Women (AAUW) Education Foundation-Commission on Technology, Gender, and Teacher Education. (1998). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: Author.
18. American Association of University Women (AAUW) Education Foundation-Commission on Technology, Gender, and Teacher Education. (1998). Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: Author.
19. The Children's Partnership. (2000). Online content for low income and underserved Americans: The digital divide's new frontier. Washington, DC:Author.
20. Heaviside, S., Rowland, C., Hurst, C., & McArthur, E. (2000, Spring). What are the barriers to the use of advanced telecommunications for students with disabilities in public schools? Educational Statistics Quarterly, 2(1), 1-2.
21. National Public Radio, the Kaiser Family Foundation, & the JFK School of Government at Harvard University. (February 2000). National Survey of American Adults and Children on Technology/National Survey of American Kids on Technology. Retrieved July 10, 2005, from http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/poll/technology/technology.kids.html
22. National Broadcast System. (1999, 2000). Digital divide (2-part PBS film series Web site). Retrieved July 10, 2005, from http://www.pbs.org/digitaldivide/index.html
23. Revenaugh, M. (2000). Beyond the digital divide:Pathways to equity. Technology and Learning, 20(10), 38-40, 44-49.
24. Silverman, S. (1998). Guidance, gender equity, and technology education. Hartford,CT:Vocational Equity Research, Technology, and Evaluation.
25. Warren-Sams, B. (1997). Closing the equity gap in technology access and use. Portland, OR: Center for Origin, Race, and Sex Equity (CNORSE), Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory and the Northwest Educational Technology Consortium.
26. Williams, C. (2000). Statistics in brief: Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms, 1994-1999. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
27. Black, S. (2000). Nutrition and learning. American School Board Journal, 187(2), 49-51.
28. Ethnic/Cultural and Special Audience Food Guide Pyramid. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/etext/000023.html
29. Hampton, H. (1992). One of the small details that got overlooked: School meals as response to cultural diversity. Research Papers in Education, 7, 173-194.
30. Tynes, S. R. (2001). Bringing social class home: The social class genealogy and poverty lunch projects. Teaching Sociology, 29, 286-298.
31. Cone, S. (2004). Pay me now or pay me later: 10 years and have we seen any change? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 271-280.
32. Evans, J., Rich, E., & Davies, B. (2004). The emperor's new clothes: Fat, thin, and overweight. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 372-391.
33. Healthy School Food Policies: A Checklist. http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/schoolfoodschecklist.htm.