Large-scale inverse modeling with an application in hydraulic tomography

Water Resources Research

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Liu, X ^a   Kitanidis, P K ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN METHODS; DIRECT MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; INDIRECT MEASUREMENTS; INVERSE METHODS; INVERSE MODELING; REMEDIATION PROJECTS; SUBSURFACE MEDIA;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULICS; TOMOGRAPHY;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INVERSE ANALYSIS; LABORATORY METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; SAND; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 79551664076     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010WR009144     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ammar, G., and W. Gragg (1987), The generalized Schur algorithm for the superfast solution of Toeplitz systems, in Rational Approximation and Its Applications in Mathematics and Physics, Lect. Notes Math., vol. 1237, pp. 315- 330, doi:10.1007/BFb0072474, Springer, New York.
2. Cardiff, M., W. Barrash, P. K. Kitanidis, B. Malama, A. Revil, S. Straface, and E. Rizzo (2009), A potential-based inversion of unconfined steadystate hydraulic tomography, Ground Water, 47(2), 259-270.
3. Carrera, J., A. Alcolea, A. Medina, J. Hidalgo, and L. J. Slooten (2005), Inverse problem in hydrogeology, Hydrogeol. J., 13(1), 206-222.
4. Constable, S. C., R. L. Parker, and C. G. Constable (1987), Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics, 52(3), 289-300.
5. Dagan, G. (1985), Stochastic modeling of groundwater-flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: The inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 21(1), 65-72.
6. de Hoog, F. (1987), A new algorithm for solving Toeplitz systems of equations, Linear Algebra Its Appl., 88-89, 123-138, doi:10.1016/0024-3795(87) 90107-8.
7. Ezzedine, S., and Y. Rubin (1997), Analysis of the Cape Cod tracer data, Water Resour. Res., 33(1), 1-11.
8. Gill, P. E., and W. Murray (1981), Practical Optimization, pp. 113-113, Academic, New York.
9. Golub, G., and W. Kahan (1965), Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2, 205-224.
10. Gomez-Hernandez, J. J., A. Sahuquillo, and J. E. Capilla (1997), Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data- I. Theory, J. Hydrol., 203(1-4), 162-174.
11. Gouveia, W. P., and J. A. Scales (1997), Resolution of seismic waveform inversion: Bayes versus Occam, Inverse Probl., 13, 323-349, doi:10.1088/ 0266-5611/13/2/009.
12. Hoeksema, R. J., and P. K. Kitanidis (1984), An application of the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in two-dimensional groundwater modeling, Water Resour. Res., 20(7), 1003-1020.
13. Illman, W. A., X. Y. Liu, and A. Craig (2007), Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms, J. Hydrol., 341, 222-234.
14. Illman, W. A., A. J. Craig, and X. Liu (2008), Practical issues in imaging hydraulic conductivity through hydraulic tomography, Ground Water, 46, 120-132.
15. Illman, W. A., X. Y. Liu, S. Takeuchi, T. C. J. Yeh, K. Ando, and H. Saegusa (2009), Hydraulic tomography in fractured granite: Mizunami underground research site, Japan, Water Resour. Res., 45, W01406, doi:10.1029/2007WR006715.
16. Kitanidis, P. K. (1995), Quasi-linear geostatistical theory for inversing, Water Resour. Res., 31(10), 2411-2419.
17. Kitanidis, P. K. (1997), Introduction to Geostatistics: Applications in Hydrogeology, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
18. Kitanidis, P. K. (1999), Generalized covariance functions associated with the Laplace equation and their use in interpolation and inverse problems, Water Resour. Res., 35(5), 1361-1367.
19. Kitanidis, P. K., and E. G. Vomvoris (1983), A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady-state) and onedimensional simulations, Water Resour. Res., 19(3), 677-690.
20. Li, W., W. Nowak, and O. A. Cirpka (2005), Geostatistical inverse modeling of transient pumping tests using temporal moments of drawdown, Water Resour. Res., 41, W08403, doi:10.1029/2004WR003874. (Pubitemid 41393333)
21. Liu, X., W. A. Illman, A. J. Craig, J. Zhu, and T. C. J. Yeh (2007), Laboratory sandbox validation of transient hydraulic tomography, Water Resour. Res., 43, W05404, doi:10.1029/2006WR005144. (Pubitemid 46998209)
22. McLaughlin, D., and L. R. Townley (1997), Reply, Water Resour. Res., 33(9), 2203-2204.
23. Michalak, A. M., and P. K. Kitanidis (2004), Estimation of historical groundwater contaminant distribution using the adjoint state method applied to geostatistical inverse modeling, Water Resour. Res., 40, W08302, doi:10.1029/2004WR003214. (Pubitemid 39250910)
24. Nocedal, J., and S. J. Wright (1999), Numerical Optimization, p. 43, Springer, New York.
25. Nowak, W., and O. A. Cirpka (2006), Geostatistical inference of hydraulic conductivity and dispersivities from hydraulic heads and tracer data, Water Resour. Res., 42, W08416, doi:10.1029/2005WR004832. (Pubitemid 44506738)
26. Nowak, W., S. Tenkleve, and O. A. Cirpka (2003), Efficient computation of linearized cross-covariance and auto-covariance matrices of interdependent quantities, Math. Geol., 35(1), 53-66.
27. Naevdal, G., L. Johnsen, S. Aanonsen, and E. Vefring (2005), Reservoir monitoring and continuous model updating using ensemble Kalman filter, SPE J., 10(1), 66-74, doi:10.2118/84372-PA. (Pubitemid 40573690)
28. Paige, C. C. (1974), Bidiagonalization of matrices and solution of linear equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 11(1), 197-209.
29. Paige, C. C., and M. A. Saunders (1982), LSQR-An algorithm for sparse linear-equations and sparse least-squares, Trans. Math. Software, 8(1), 43-71.
30. Rubin, Y. (1991), Prediction of tracer plume migration in disordered porous- media by the method of conditional probabilities, Water Resour. Res., 27(6), 1291-1308.
31. Snodgrass, M. F., and P. K. Kitanidis (1997), A geostatistical approach to contaminant source identification, Water Resour. Res., 33(4), 537-546.
32. Tikhonov, A. N., and V. Y. Arsenin (1977), Solution of Ill-Posed Problems, Winston, Washington, D. C.
33. Xiang, J., T.-C. J. Yeh, C.-H. Lee, K.-C. Hsu, and J.-C. Wen (2009), A simultaneous successive linear estimator and a guide for hydraulic tomography analysis, Water Resour. Res., 45, W02432, doi:10.1029/ 2008WR007180.
34. Yeh, T. C. J., M. H. Jin, and S. Hanna (1996), An iterative stochastic inverse method: Conditional effective transmissivity and hydraulic head fields, Water Resour. Res., 32(1), 85-92.
35. Yeh, W. W.-G. (1986), Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology: The inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 95-108.
36. Zanini, A., and P. K. Kitanidis (2009), Geostatistical inversing for largecontrast transmissivity fields, Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 23(5), 565-577, doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0241-7.
37. Zimmerman, D. A., et al. (1998), A comparison of seven geostatistically based inverse approaches to estimate transmissivities for modeling advective transport by groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res., 34(6), 1373-1413.