Supporting replication and scale-up of evidence-based home visiting programs: Assessing the implementation knowledge base

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 104, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1624-1632

  Paulsell, Diane ^a   Del Grosso, Patricia ^a   Supplee, Lauren ^b  

^a MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MASS COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL WORK;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; SOCIAL WORK;

EID: 84906096858     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301962     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Haskins R, Baron J. Building the Connection Between Policy and Evidence: The Obama Evidence-Based Initiatives. London, England: Nesta; 2011.
2. Clancy CM, Cronin K. Evidence-based decision making: global evidence, local decisions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(1):151-162.
3. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
4. Saul J, Wandersman A, Flaspohler P, Duffy J, Lubell K, Noonan R. Research and action for bridging the gap between prevention research and practice. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3-4):165-170.
5. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3-4): 171-181.
6. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3-4):327-350.
7. Berkel C, Mauricio AM, Schoenfelder E, Sandler IN. Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation. Prev Sci. 2010;12(1):23-33.
8. Gearing RE, El-Bassel N, Ghesquiere A, Baldwin S, Gillies J, Ngeow E. Major ingredients of fidelity: a review and scientific guide to improving quality of intervention research implementation. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(1): 79-88.
9. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274- 1281.
10. Avellar S, Paulsell D. Lessons Learned From the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 2011.
11. Paulsell D, Avellar S. Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness: Executive Summary. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 2011.
12. Metz A, Bartley L. Active implementation frameworks for program success: how to use implementation science to improve outcomes for children. Zero Three. 2012;32(4):11-18.
13. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute; 2005.
14. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2005.
15. Stith S, Pruitt I, Dees J, et al. Implementing community-based prevention programming: a review of the literature. J Prim Prev. 2006;27(6):599-617.
16. Aarons GA, Palinkas LA. Implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare: service provider perspectives. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007;34(4): 411-419.
17. Aarons GA, Sawitzky AC. Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychol Serv. 2006;3(1):61-72.
18. Duggan AK. Service is everything: how home visiting service delivery impacts family outcomes. Available at: http://www.hfrp.org/publications- resources/ browse-our-publications/service-is-everything-howhome-visiting- service-delivery-impacts-family-outcomes. Accessed May 23, 2014.
19. Lloyd CM, Supplee LH, Mattera SK. An eye to efficient and effective fidelity measurement for both research and practice. In: Halle T, Metz AJR, Martinez-Beck I, eds. Applying Implementation Science in Early Childhood Programs and Systems. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 2013:139-155.
20. Schoenwald SK. It's a bird, it's a plane. it's fidelity measurement in the real world. Clin Psychol (New York). 2011;18(2):142-147.
21. Weber RP. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
22. Duggan A, Caldera D, Rodriguez K, Burrell L, Rohde C, Crowne SS. Impact of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2007;31(8):801-827.
23. Peterson CA, Luze GJ, Eshbaugh EM, Hyun-joo J, Kantz KR. Enhancing parent-child interactions through home visiting: promising practice or unfulfilled promise? J Early Interv. 2007;29(2):119-140.
24. Minkovitz C, Strobino D, Hughart N, Scharfstein D, Guyer B, Healthy Steps Evaluation Team. Early effects of the Healthy Steps for Young Children Program. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(4):470-479.
25. Gill S, Greenberg MT, Moon C, Margraf P. Home visitor competence, burnout, support, and client engagement. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2007;15(1):23-44.
26. Levin M, Gamse B, Swartz J, Tao F, Tarr H. National Evaluation of the Even Start Family Literacy Program: Report on Migrant Even Start Projects. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc; 1997.
27. Michalczyk L, Illback RJ. Qualitative Evaluation of the Health Access: Nurturing Development Services (HANDS) Program. Louisville, KY: REACH of Louisville; 2002.
28. Golas JC, Horm D, Caruso DA. Challenges in implementing center-based and home-based Early Head Start programs. J Res Child Educ. 2006;21(2):163-175.
29. DuMont K, Mitchell-Herzfeld S, Greene R, et al. Healthy Families New York (HFNY) randomized trial: effects on early child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Negl. 2008;32(3):295-315.
30. Feres-Lewin C. An Analysis of the Governance and Administrative Elements of a Public-Private Partnership Approach to Community-Based Education. Las Vegas, NV: University of Nevada, Las Vegas; 2000.
31. Rector EJ. Early Head Start: Home Visiting and Parenting Group Program Uptake: An Implementation Study. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 2002.
32. Caldera D, Burrell L, Rodriguez K, Crowne SS, Rohde C, Duggan A. Impact of a statewide home visiting program on parenting and on child health and development. Child Abuse Negl. 2007;31(8):829-852.
33. Healthy Families Arizona Evaluation Report 2003. Tucson, AZ: LeCroy &Milligan Associates Inc; 2003.
34. Koniak-Griffin D, Anderson NL, Brecht ML, Verzemnieks I, Lesser J, Kim S. Public health nursing care for adolescent mothers: impact on infant health and selected maternal outcomes at 1 year postbirth. J Adolesc Health. 2002;30(1):44-54.
35. Sandler L, Heffernon R, Sheety A. On Track With Phoenix Early Head Start: Evaluation Report, 1997-98. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, Morrison Institute for Public Policy; 1999.
36. Chambliss JW. An Experimental Trial of a Home Visiting Program to Prevent Child Maltreatment. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University; 1998.
37. Duggan AK, McFarlane EC, Windham AM, et al. Evaluation of Hawaii's Healthy Start Program. Future Child. 1999;9(1):66-90.
38. Paulsell D, Kisker EE, Love JM, et al. Leading the Way: Characteristics and Early Experiences of Selected Early Head Start Programs. Program Implementation: Early Head Start Research.Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Commissioner's Office of Research and Evaluation, Head Start Bureau; 2000.
39. Arthur MM. Qualitative Evaluation of Kentucky's Health Access: Nurturing Development Services Program. Louisville, KY: Spalding University; 2001.
40. Newman LJ. Inside the "Black Box": The Use of Parenting Education Curriculum in Home Visiting. Albany, NY: State University of New York at Albany; 2008.
41. Graham Rawlings CA. Family Support Within a Cultural Context: An Ethnographic Study of Consonance and Dissonance in the Parenting and Help-Seeking Ethnotheories of Home Visitors and Their Clients. Medford, MA: Tufts University; 2003.
42. Jacobs F, Easterbrooks MA, Brady AE, Jayanthi M. Healthy Families Massachusetts: Final Evaluation Report. Medford, MA: Tufts University; 2005.
43. Healthy Families Arizona Evaluation Report 2007. Tucson, AZ: LeCroy &Milligan Associates Inc; 2007.
44. Brand A,Walker DK, Hargreaves M, Rosenbach ML. Intermediate outcomes, strategies, and challenges of eight Healthy Start projects. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 14(5):654-665.
45. Tandon SD, Parillo KM, Jenkins C, Duggan AK. Formative evaluation of home visitors' role in addressing poor mental health, domestic violence, and substance abuse among low-income pregnant and parenting women. Matern Child Health J. 2005;9(3):273-283.
46. Healthy Families Arizona Evaluation Report 2008. Tucson, AZ: LeCroy &Milligan Associates Inc; 2008.
47. Hicks D, Larson C, Nelson C, Olds DL, Johnston E. The influence of collaboration on program outcomes: the Colorado nurse-family partnership. Eval Rev. 2008; 32(5):453-477.
48. Evaluation of the Healthy Families Alaska Program. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2005.
49. Farquhar S. An Evaluation of Parents as First Teachers Programme. Wellington, New Zealand: Early Childhood Development Unit; 2002.
50. Heffernon R, Sandler L. Phoenix Early Head Start: Twelve Family Stories. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, Morrison Institute for Public Policy; 2000.
51. Korfmacher J, Kitzman H, Olds D. Intervention processes as predictors of outcomes in a preventive home-visitation program. J Community Psychol. 1998; 26(1):49-64.
52. Daro DA, Harding KA. Healthy Families America: using research to enhance practice. Future Child. 1999; 9(1):152-176.
53. Olds DL, Hill PL, O'Brien RA, Racine D, Moritz P. Taking preventive intervention to scale: the nurse-family partnership. Cogn Behav Pract. 2003;10(4):278-290.
54. Wagner M, Spiker D. Experiences and Outcomes of Children and Families: Multisite Parents as Teachers Evaluation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International; 2001.
55. Wagner M, Clayton S, Gerlach-Downie S, McElroy M. An Evaluation of the Northern California Parents as Teachers Demonstration. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International; 1999.
56. Jones Harden B, Chazan-Cohen R, Raikes H, Vogel C. Early Head Start home visitation: the role of implementation in bolstering program benefits. J Community Psychol. 2012;40(4):438-455.
57. Kitzman HJA, Cole RA, Yoos HLA, Olds DA. Challenges experienced by home visitors: a qualitative study of program implementation. J Community Psychol. 1997;25(1):95-109.
58. Kisker EE, Love JM, Raikes H. Leading the Way: Characteristics and Early Experiences of Selected Early Head Start Programs. Cross-Site Perspectives: Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Head Start Bureau; 1999.
59. Brookes SJ, Summers JA, Thornburg KR, Ispa JM, Lane VJ. Building successful home visitor-mother relationships and reaching program goals in two Early Head Start programs: a qualitative look at contributing factors. Early Child Res Q. 2006;21(1):25-45.
60. Oakley A, Rajan L, Turner H. Evaluating parent support initiatives: lessons from two case studies. Health Soc Care Community. 1998;6(5):318-330.
61. Wagner M, Spiker D, Gerlach-Downie S, Hernandez F. Parental Engagement in Home Visiting Programs: Findings From the Parents as Teachers Multisite Evaluation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International; 2000.
62. Glisson C, Schoenwald SJ, Kelleher K, et al. Therapist turnover and new program sustainability in mental health clinics as a function of organizational culture, climate, and service structure. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008;35(1-2):124-133.
63. Century J, Cassata A, Rudnick M, Freeman C. Measuring enactment of innovations and the factors that affect implementation sustainability: moving toward common language and shared conceptual understanding. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012;39(4):343-361.