Contrast enhanced MR venography with gadofosveset trisodium: Evaluation of the intracranial and extracranial venous system

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 630-640

  Kramer, Larry A ^a   Cohen, Alan M ^a   Hasan, Khader M ^a   Heimbigner, Jared H ^a   Barreto, Andrew D ^a   Brod, Staley A ^a   Narayana, Ponnada A ^a   Wolinsky, Jerry S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

contrast; gadofosveset trisodium; Gadolinium; MRV; multiple sclerosis

Indexed keywords

GADOFOSVESET; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRACHIOCEPHALIC VEIN; BRAIN VEIN; CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE VENOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THYROID GLAND; VEIN BLOOD FLOW; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BRAIN CIRCULATION; DIAGNOSTIC USE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VEIN;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VEINS;

EID: 84906084714     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24409     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gao JH, Gore JC,. NMR signal from flowing nuclei in fast gradient-echo pulse sequences with refocusing. Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 2305-23218.
2. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Pettigrew RI,. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 193-199.
3. Evans AJ, Blinder RA, Herfkens RJ, et al. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images. Invest Radiol 1988; 23: 512-518.
4. Ayanzen RH, Bird CR, Keller PJ, McCully FJ, Theobald MR, Heiserman JE,. Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 74-78.
5. Siegel JM Jr, Oshinski JN, Pettigrew RI, Ku DN,. Computational simulation of turbulent signal loss in 2D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiograms. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 609-614.
6. Widjaja E, Shroff M, Blaser S, Laughlin S, Raybaud C,. 2D time-of-flight MR venography in neonates: anatomy and pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1913-1918.
7. Kirchhof K, Welzel T, Jansen O, Sartor K,. More reliable noninvasive visualization of the cerebral veins and dural sinuses: comparison of three MR angiographic techniques. Radiology 2002; 224: 804-810.
8. Rollins N, Ison C, Reyes T, Chia J,. Cerebral MR venography in children: comparison of 2D time-of-flight and gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo techniques. Radiology 2005; 235: 1011-1017.
9. Bosmans H, Marchal G, Lukito G, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain: comparison of acquisition techniques in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 161-167.
10. Klingebiel R, Bauknecht HC, Bohner G, Kirsch R, Berger J, Masuhr F,. Comparative evaluation of 2D time-of-flight and 3D elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR venography in patients with presumptive cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis. Eur J Neurol 2007; 14: 139-143.
11. Blatter DD, Parker DL, Robison RO,. Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. Part I. Quantitative analysis of vessel visibility. Radiology 1991; 179: 805-811.
12. Lev MH, Romero JM, Gonzalez RG,. Flow voids in time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis? It depends on the TE! AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 2120.
13. Doepp F, Wurfel JT, Pfueller CF, et al. Venous drainage in multiple sclerosis: a combined MRI and ultrasound study. Neurology 2011; 77: 1745-1751.
14. Hadizadeh DR, Kukuk GM, Fahlenkamp UL, et al. Simultaneous MR arteriography and venography with blood pool contrast agent detects deep venous thrombosis in suspected arterial disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 1188-1195.
15. Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 392-399.
16. Farb RI, Vanek I, Scott JN, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the prevalence and morphology of sinovenous stenosis. Neurology 2003; 60: 1418-1424.
17. Jayaraman MV, Boxerman JL, Davis LM, Haas RA, Rogg JM,. Incidence of extrinsic compression of the internal jugular vein in unselected patients undergoing CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 1247-1250.
18. Barreto AD, Brod SA, Bui TT, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: case-control neurosonography results. Ann Neurol 2013; 73: 721-728.
19. Brod SA, Kramer LA, Cohen AM, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: masked multimodal imaging assessment. Mult Scler 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
20. Labropoulos N, Borge M, Pierce K, Pappas PJ,. Criteria for defining significant central vein stenosis with duplex ultrasound. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 101-107.
21. Feng W, Utriainen D, Trifan G, et al. Characteristics of flow through the internal jugular veins at cervical C2/C3 and C5/C6 levels for multiple sclerosis patients using MR phase contrast imaging. Neurol Res 2012; 34: 802-809.
22. Zivadinov R, Lopez-Soriano A, Weinstock-Guttman B, et al. Use of MR venography for characterization of the extracranial venous system in patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy control subjects. Radiology 2011; 258: 562-570.
23. Zivadinov R, Galeotti R, Hojnacki D, et al. Value of MR venography for detection of internal jugular vein anomalies in multiple sclerosis: a pilot longitudinal study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 938-946.
24. Hojnacki D, Zamboni P, Lopez-Soriano A, et al. Use of neck magnetic resonance venography, Doppler sonography and selective venography for diagnosis of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a pilot study in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls. Int Angiol 2010; 29: 127-139.
25. Glantz SA,. Primer of biostatistics. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2005.
26. Leach C,. Introduction to statistics: a nonparametric approach for the social sciences. New York: Wiley; 1979.
27. Viera AJ, Garrett JM,. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005; 37: 360-363.
28. Parmelee DJ, Walovitch RC, Ouellet HS, Lauffer RB,. Preclinical evaluation of the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and elimination of MS-325, a blood pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1997; 32: 741-747.
29. Lauffer RB, Parmelee DJ, Dunham SU, et al. MS-325: albumin-targeted contrast agent for MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 207: 529-538.
30. Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum RA, Owen RS, Carpenter JT, Cope C,. Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18: 734-741.
31. Cramer SC, Rordorf G, Maki JH, et al. Increased pelvic vein thrombi in cryptogenic stroke: results of the Paradoxical Emboli from Large Veins in Ischemic Stroke (PELVIS) study. Stroke 2004; 35: 46-50.
32. Duan X, Ling F, Shen Y, Yang J, Xu HY,. Venous spasm during contrast-guided axillary vein puncture for pacemaker or defibrillator lead implantation. Europace 2012; 14: 1008-1011.
33. Barber CJ,. Central venous catheter placement for intravenous digital subtraction angiography: an assessment of technical problems and success rate. Br J Radiol 1989; 62: 599-602.
34. Singh RN, Salvoza MI,. Laminar flow due to venous valves masquerading as vein graft spasm. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1983; 9: 569-575.
35. Helps EP, Mc DD,. Observations on laminar flow in veins. J Physiol 1954; 124: 631-639.
36. Harmon JV Jr, Edwards WD,. Venous valves in subclavian and internal jugular veins. Frequency, position, and structure in 100 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiovasc Pathol 1987; 1: 51-54.
37. Nikolaou K, Kramer H, Grosse C, et al. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR angiography with parallel imaging and blood pool contrast agent: initial experience. Radiology 2006; 241: 861-872.
38. Mayer CA, Pfeilschifter W, Lorenz MW, et al. The perfect crime? CCSVI not leaving a trace in MS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82: 436-440.
39. Lebowitz JA, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC,. Gadolinium-enhanced body MR venography with subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 755-758.
40. Cavagna FM, Maggioni F, Castelli PM, et al. Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to serum proteins. A new class of high-efficiency, general purpose contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1997; 32: 780-796.
41. Platzek J, Blaszkiewicz P, Gries H, et al. Synthesis and structure of a new macrocyclic polyhydroxylated gadolinium chelate used as a contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Inorg Chem 1997; 36: 6086-6093.