The PROMIS® smoking assessment toolkit-background and Introduction to supplement

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL.3, 2014, Pages

  Edelen, Maria Orlando ^a  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; EXPECTANCY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SMOKING; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; FACTUAL DATABASE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; SMOKING; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 84906068878     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu086     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ader, D. N. (2007). Developing the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S1-S2. Retrieved from http://uwcorr.washington.edu/ publications/developing_ader.pdf
2. Cai, L. (2010). A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications. Psychometrika, 75, 581-612 doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9178-0
3. Cai, L., Du Toit, S. H. C., & Thissen, D. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International
4. Cai, L., Yang, J. S., & Hansen, M. (2011). Generalized fullinformation item bifactor analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 221-248. doi:10.1037/a0023350
5. Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., ... PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45, S3-S11. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443116
6. Chen, W. H. & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indices for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265-289 Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1165285
7. DeWalt, D., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. (2007) Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45, S12-S21. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2
8. Dorans, N. J. (2007). Linking scores from multiple health outcome instruments. Quality of Life Research, 16, 85-94. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17286198
9. Edelen, M., Tucker, J., Shadel, W. G., & Stuckey, B (2012). Toward a more systematic assessment of smoking: Development of a smoking module for PROMIS®Addictive Behaviors, 37, 1278-1284. doi:10.1097/01mlr.0000245251.83359.8c
10. Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5-18 doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0
11. Edelen, M. O., Thissen, D., Teresi, J. A., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2006). Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach: Application to the Mini-Mental Status Examination. Medical Care, 44, S134-S142. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17060820
12. Embretson, S. E. (1996). The new rules of measurement. Psychol Assessment, 8, 341-349. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341
13. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
14. Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: Using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23, S53-S57. Retrieved from http://wwwncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16273785
15. Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423-436 doi:10.1007/BF02295430
16. Hahn, E. A., Cella, D., Bode, R. K., Gershon, R., & Lai, J.-S (2006). Item banks and their potential applications to health status assessment in diverse populations. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl. 3), S189-S197. Retrieved from http://www.scholarsnorthwestern.edu/pubDetail.asp?t=&id=33750351039&
17. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff
18. Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential item functioning Hillsdale, NJ: LEA
19. Jones, L. V., and Thissen, D. (2007). A history and overview of psychometrics. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics 26: Psychometrics (pp. 1-27). New York, NY: Elsevier
20. Linn, R. L. (1992). Linking results of distinct assessments Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 6/11/92, 2nd Draft
21. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum
22. Mislevy, R. J. (1992). Linking educational assessments: Concepts, issues, methods, and prospects. Educational Testing Services, Princeton, NJ. December 1992, Policy Issue/Perspective
23. Panter, A. T., & Reeve, B. B. (2002). Assessing tobacco beliefs among youth using item response theory models. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68 (Suppl. 1) S21-S39. Retrieved from http://www.drugandalcoholdependence.com/article/S0376-8716(02)00213-2/fulltext
24. Shadel, W. G., Edelen, M., & Tucker, J. S. (2011). A unified framework for smoking assessment: The PROMIS Smoking Initiative. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 13, 399-400 doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq253
25. Shiffman, S. (2009). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in studies of substance use. Psychological Assessment, 21, 486. doi:10.1037/a0017074
26. Teresi, J. A. (2006). Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Medical Care, 44(Suppl. 3), S39-S49. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245452.48613.45
27. Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer Mahwah, NJ: LEA
28. Wainer, H., & Mislevy, R. J. (2000). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 61-100) Mahwah, NJ: LEA