Reply: Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: A systematic review

Human Reproduction Update

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 802-803

  Kaser, Daniel J ^a   Racowsky, Catherine ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

CELL TRACKING; EMBRYO; HUMAN; LETTER; MONITORING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXYGEN TENSION; PATIENT SELECTION; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TIME; TIME LAPSE MONITORING;

EMBRYO SELECTION; IMPLANTATION; MORPHOKINETICS; NOMENCLATURE; TIME-LAPSE MONITORING;

BLASTOCYST; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING;

EID: 84906057896     PISSN: 13554786     EISSN: 14602369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu045     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Conaghan J, Chen AA, Willman SP, Ivani K, Chenette PE, Boostanfar R, Baker VL, Adamson GD, Abusief ME, Gvakharia M et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertil Steril 2013;100:412-419.
2. Kaser DJ, RacowskyC. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20:617-631.
3. Kirkegaard K, Kesmodel US, Hindkjær JJ, Ingerslev HJ. Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:2643-2651.
4. Sundvall L, Ingerslev HJ, Breth Knudsen U, Kirkegaard K. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations. Hum Reprod 2013;28:3215-3221.