The return of panopticism: Supervision, subjection and the new surveillance

Surveillance and Society

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-20

  Simon, Bart ^a  

^a Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893144720     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, Polity Press.
2. Bogard, W. (1991) ‘Discipline and Deterrence: Rethinking Foucault on the Question of Power in Contemporary Society.’ The Social Science Journal 28(3): 325-346.
3. Bogard, W. (1996) The Simulation of Surveillance: Hypercontrol in Telematic Societies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
4. Boyne, R. (2000) ‘Post-Panopticism.’ Economy and Society 29(2): 285-307.
5. Butler, J. (1997) The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
6. Clarke, R. (1993) ‘The Digital Persona and its Application to Dataveillance.’ The Information Society 10(2).
7. Cohen, S. (1985) Visions of Social Control. Cambridge, Polity Press.
8. Deleuze, G. (1992) ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control.’ October 59: 3-7.
9. Elden, S. (2003) ‘Plague, Panopticon, Police,’ Surveillance and Society 1(3): 240-253. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(3)/ppp.pdf
10. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, Pantheon.
11. Foucault, M. (1977b) ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.’ Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. D. Bouchard (ed.). Ithica, NY, Cornell University Press.
12. Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York, Random House Inc.
13. Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The Subject and Power’ in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. P. Rabinow and H. Dreyfus (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Foucault, M. (1988) ‘Technologies of the Self.’ Technologies of the Self. L. Martin, H. Gutman and P. Hutton (eds.). Amh erst, MA, UMass. Press: 16-49.
15. Foucault, M. (1993) ‘About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self: Two Lectures at Dartmouth.’ Political Theory 21(2): 198-227.
16. Gandy, O. (1993). The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information. Boulder, CO, Westview Press.
17. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, Polity Press.
18. Gilliom, J. (2001) Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance and the Limits of Privacy. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
19. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, Doubleday.
20. Gooday, G. (1991) ‘Nature in the Laboratory: Domestication and Discipline With the Microscope in Victorian Life Science.’ British Journal for the History of Science 24(82): 307-341.
21. Goodlad, L. (2003) ‘Beyond the Panopticon: Victorian Britain and the Critical Imagination.’ PMLA 118(3): 539-56.
22. Green, S. (1999) ‘A Plague on the Panopticon: Surveillance and Power in the Global Information Economy.’ Information, Communication and Society 2(1): 26-44.
23. Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
24. Haggerty, K. and R. Ericson (2000) ‘The Surveillant Assemblage.’ British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605-622.
25. Hier, S. (2003) ‘Probing the Surveillant Assemblage: on the dialectics of surveillance practices as processes of social control,’ Surveillance and Society 1 (3): 399-411. http://www.surveillance-andsociety.org/articles1(3)/probing.pdf
26. Jay, M. (1986) ‘In the Empire of the Gaze: Foucault and the Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought.’ Foucault: A Critical Reader. D. C. Hoy (ed.) Oxford, Blackwell: 175-204.
27. Kammerer, D. (2005) ‘Video Surveillance in Hollywood Movies’ Surveillance and Society 2 (2/3): 464-473. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/cctv.htm.
28. Koskela, H. (2003) ‘“Cam era”: The Contemporary Urban Panopticon.’ Surveillance and Society 1 (3): 292-313. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(3)/camera.pdf
29. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
30. Latour, B. (1990) Drawing Things Together. Representation in Scientific Practice. M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press: 19-68.
31. Lyon, D. (1992) ‘The New Surveillance: Electronic technologies and the Maximum Security Society.’ Crime, Law and Social Change 18: 159-175.
32. Lyon, D. (1994) The Electronic Eye: The Rise of the Surveillance Society. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
33. Lyon, D. and E. Zureik (eds.) (1996) Computers, Surveillance, and Privacy. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
34. Lyon, D. (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham, Open University Press.
35. Lyon, D. (ed.) (2003) Surveillance as Social Sorting. London, Routledge.
36. Lyon, D. (2003) ‘Surveillance as Social Sorting: Computer Codes and Mobile Bodies.’ Surveillance as Social Sorting. D. Lyon (ed.). London, Routledge.
37. Marx, G. (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley, University of California Press.
38. Mathieson, T. (1997) ‘The Viewer Society.’ Theoretical Criminology 1(2).
39. Myrick, A (2004) ‘Escape from the Carceral: Writing by American Prisoners, 1895-1916,’ Surveillance and Society 2 (1): 93-109. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles2(1)/carceral.pdf
40. Norris, C. and G. Armstrong (1999) The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV. Oxford, Berg.
41. Norris, C. (2003) ‘From Personal to Digital: CCTV, the Panopticon and the Technological Mediation of Suspicion and Social Control.’ Surveillance as Social Sorting. D. Lyon (ed.). London, Routledge.
42. Poster, M. (1984) Foucault, Marxism and History. Cambridge, Polity Press.
43. Poster, M. (1996) ‘Databases as Discourse, or, Electronic Interpellations.’ Computers, Surveillance, and Privacy. D. Lyon and E. Zureik (eds.). Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press: 175-192.
44. Robbins, K. and F. Webster (1999) Times of the Technoculture: From the Information Society to the Virtual Life. London, Routledge.
45. Sclove, D. (2000) ‘Privacy and Power: Computer Databases and Metaphors of Information Privacy.’ Unpublished Manuscript.
46. Vaz, P., and Bruno, F. (2003) ‘Types of Self-Surveillance: from abnormality to individuals ‘at risk’,’ Surveillance and Society 1(3): 272-291. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(3)/self.pdf
47. Werret, S. (1999) ‘Potemkin and the Panopticon: Samuel Bentham and the Architecture of Absolutism in Eighteenth Century Russia.’ Journal of Bentham Studies, 2. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/journal/nlwerret.htm
48. Wieder, D. L. (1974) Language and Social Reality: The Case of Telling the Convict Code. The Hague, Mouton.
49. Yar, M. (2003) ‘Panoptic Power and the Pathologisation of Vision: Critical Reflections on the Foucaudian Thesis.’ Surveillance and Society 1(3): 254-271. http://www.surveillance-andsociety.org/articles1(3)/pathologisation.pdf
50. Zureik, E. (2003) ‘Theorizing Surveillance: The Case of the Workplace.’ Surveillance as Social Sorting. D. Lyon (ed.). London, Routledge.